chess online

chess online

ANNOTATED GAME

R4: is it enough?
White Player (1451) vs. l-d-j (1387)
Annotated by: l-d-j (1737)
Chess opening: Petrov three knights game (C42)
Interactive Show all comments All annotated games View as color:
Pages: 123
18. Qa3
The computer proposes 18.Rxe8 Rxe8 (perhaps to reduce the activity of Black's major pieces) followed by 19.c4.
2 comments
 
18... Re7
?! Preparing to double on the e-file. Fritz prefers 18...Ra8 to threaten the queen, but that moves the rook off the open e-file which I found a bit strange (I didn't play it because I thought it wouldn't accomplish anything).
3 comments
 
19. Rad1
?! Again Fritz prefers 19.c4 to close off the center and gives that position as equal (White has the passed pawn, Black the more activity).
1 comment
 
19... Rfe8
Natural, but Fritz wants me to play 19...Rxe1+ 20.Rxe1 c4 now, to chase the bishop to a passive square.

 
20. Qc1
The last chance for 20.Rxe7 Qxe7 21.c4. Now Black does it.
1 comment
 
20... c4 21. Bf1 Re7e5
Black has more center control and more space, but is it enough to win? A club member with a rating of 1800 who was playing in a higher section of the tournament suggested after the game that I should have played 21...Bf5 here, which I had considered, but I thought White could just hold and the computer agrees. I noted during the game that 22.Bxc4?? is not possible, because I can simply take with 22...dxc4! and the queen on d6 is immune due to the back rank mating threat.
2 comments
 
22. Rxe5 Qxe5 23. Qd2
Forced to defend c3. Attacks d5 at the same time.

 
23... c6
Freeing my pieces from the defence of d5. Here 24.Bxc4 still does not work.
2 comments
 
24. f3
Maybe to tempt me into playing my next move, but it seems more natural to play 24.a4, to try and get the passed pawn to the 8th rank.
2 comments
 
24... Qe3+
?! Forcing a queen exchange, thinking I could win the c-pawn afterwards, but forgetting about the Bxc4 threat.
3 comments
 
25. Qxe3 Rxe3 26. Bxc4
! of course. Now 26...dxc4 leads almost immediately to a draw after 27.Rxd7 Rxc3 and the rook ending must be an easy draw, so I decided to keep the bishops on the board.
3 comments
 
26... Rxc3 27. Bb3
Everything just holds for White.

 
27... Bf5
?! An inaccuracy by me. Better was 27...Kf8.
2 comments
 
28. Rd2
?! White returns the favour. 28.g4! was possible because 28...Bxc2?? fails to 29.Rc1 and the bishop is lost, or an exchange after 29...Bxb3 30.Rxc3.
2 comments
 
28... Kf8 29. Re2
Probably to block my king, but it seems better to get his own king involved.
3 comments
 
29... d4 30. g4 d3
?! This leads almost immediately to a draw and probably even a slight advantage for'White. My club mate proposed 30...Bd7, to continue with ...c5 (attacking the a4 pawn) when ...c4 trapping the bishop becomes a real threat.
1 comment
 
31. cxd3
Of course not 31.gxf5?? dxe2. A rook move is no good either because then 31...dxc2 with the threat of promotion wins material.
2 comments
 
31... Bxd3 32. Re3
?! 32.Re6 even wins a pawn for White, but probably Black has enough activity to hold the draw. But at least White could have tried it. But maybe White, having defended the whole game, was content with a draw. Now Black can reach the draw quite easily.

 
32... Rc1+ 33. Kf2 Bc4
The exchange of bishops leaves us with a single rook ending with four pawns each.
2 comments
 
34. a4 Bxb3 35. Rxb3 Ra1 36. Rc3
If White wanted to try something, he should have played 36.Rb4 when he has the passed pawn that is the hardest to reach for the kings because it's far from where the kings are and which is also one step closer to promotion, but the rook would be forced to stay on the fourth rank to defend it and the pawn would not be able to advance any further so that would be a draw as well, I guess.
2 comments
 

Pages: 123