|
|
|
24... fxe3
|
So here i think i have a nice advantage but i do need to keep that passed pawn in check. |
 
|
| |
|
|
25. fxe3 Ra4
|
? I think better would have just been to recapture the pawn with the rook. My goal here was to protect my a pawn as well as keep multiple threats. |
1 comment
|
| |
|
|
26. Rd7
|
adding an attacker to my a pawn. |
|
| |
|
|
26... a6
|
? i really believe i was far too passive here and just gave up my advantage. I am too focused on his threats and not enough on my plan. In retrospect i would of taken at e3. |
|
| |
|
|
27. Ne7+
|
! Now his c pawn is looking pretty intimidating right now. The price of passive play... |
|
| |
|
|
27... Kf8 28. c6 Rxe7
|
Wins his Knight but that is short lived as that pawn is about to promote. |
|
| |
|
|
29. c7 Rxd7 30. c8=Q+ Rd8
|
So a Knight, Rook, and Pawn in exchange for a new queen. At this point i offered a draw which my opponent accepted. Looking back i think that i still had a slight advantage, but at the time i was intimidated by His newly acquired queen on an open board. If i had a bishop pair rather than the Knight i would of been far more comfortable. Ultimately i think i played too passive and i think i shouldn't have been as intimidated at this position props to my opponent for staying in the game. Any thoughts are greatly appreciated. |
2 comments
|
| |
|
(1593)
Log in 