| From | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
What is the advantage for Black in playing the KGA?It is commonly accepted that Black should not try to hold the pawn. So Black, in accepting the c4 pawn, moves his own d pawn away from the center to grab a pawn he can not keep. Yet a lot of Masters accept it. I would think it is more expedient to decline the gambit or postpone d5 altogether with an Indian Defense. What is the benefit to Black in accepting this pawn? |
||
|
in correspondence chess it will be hard. ( Database ) But in a OTB game this is about the oldest classic in the book (17th century). And with all the variations you just have a great game going and if you know a bit of theory you can create good chances to win. And i will accept this gambit always |
||
|
i never except.2.....Bc5. The reason being i don't like such wild play. |
||
|
rookie879 05-Aug-11, 14:58 |
|
||
|
hityerclock 05-Aug-11, 18:58 |
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 (3.Bc4 Be7 4.Nf4 transposes) 3...Be7 4.Bc4 (4.d4 Bh4+) 4...Nf6 5.e5 (5.Nc3 Nxe4 6.Nxe4 d5) 5...Ng4 6.O-O Nc6 7.d4 d5 8.dxe6 (8.Bd3 Ne3 9.Bxe3 fxe3 10.Qe1 O-O 11.Qxe3 f6) 8...Bxe6 9.Re1+ (9.Qe1+ Kf8 intending ...g5 and ...Kg7) 9...Ne7. Black is at least equal, if not clearly better, in all variations. This is not the "best" theoretical continuation, but the moves are common sense developing moves that are easy to remember for OTB play, and avoid the various knife fights that white wants to initiate. |
||
|
But what are specific advantages?BC I agree with you. But Easy, what are specific advantages for Black? |
||
|
l-d-j 06-Aug-11, 02:53 |
KGA or QGA? |
||
|
Ooops! I meant QGA! Thanks for the correction. Please respond according to QGA. Thank you and God Bless! Scott |
||
|
hityerclock 06-Aug-11, 10:57 |
This is really a matter of personal preference. The types of middle-games arising from playing 2...dxc4 (QGA) are different from those that arise from delaying this capture (QGD), so players will prefer QGA or QGD based on how comfortable the are with the resulting middle-game positions in each system. |
||
|
QGA |
||
|
Thanks! |
||
|
QGAresults. The reason i like it is because its a lot simpler(not better) then those being discussed. When i first played this line i looked up the QGA on 'wikipedia' and found the following; {3.e4 3. e4 is a newer line — actually a resurrected classical line — aggressively establishing a pawn center and making a bid for central control which Black will try to undermine. It is called the Central Variation by Rizzitano, who notes its increase in popularity and strategic and tactical complexity.[2] Raetsky and Chetverik consider the line straightforward and critical, and remark that anyone playing the Queen's Gambit Accepted with Black must be prepared to meet it.[1] Trying to protect the pawn with the greedy 3...b5 is fairly risky and rarely seen.[1] The main reply against the Central Variation is opposing the pawn center with 3...e5, which is a highly theoretical system. Other replies aimed at challenging the center are 3...Nc6 with ideas akin to the Chigorin Defense, 3...Nf6, provoking 4.e5, and 3...c5 undermining the center at d4.} |
||
|
What is the advantage Black in playing the QGA?Scott |
||
|
mchess8484 23-Aug-11, 06:30 |
can make it very tough for white to get any advantage. Although some of my best games have come from this opening I rarely play the King's Gambit because with correspondence chess it is very easy for black to choose the best lines from the databases. |