| From | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Chess TacticsThen this evening found myself with some spare time so I've been playing through a few of them. All I've discovered so far is that I'm weird I have 100% so far, having completed 17 puzzles. What makes me weird is looking at the average time to complete each puzzle and comparing them to mine. For the most part, I take about 40-70 seconds to complete any puzzle, regardless of how easy or difficult it is. The one anomaly is the first puzzle I did, which took 120 seconds mainly because I was still reading the instructions. Just wondering if anyone else has similar stats. Or if anyone started off like that and found that as the puzzles got more difficult they started to conform to the "norm". |
||
|
The average time for them was 2min36, 1min11 and 32seconds. |
||
|
pennsylvaniadan 09-Sep-10, 16:44 |
Solved problems: 332 (68%) Total training time: 4:27:47----Ha, I don't take much time but as your rating goes up, the puzzles get harder---also unless you do it their exact way---you fail----For players that think outside the box; like me, it can be a little frustrating----I did suggest that my team members use tactics as a warm-up before making team match moves especially if they haven't been on line for a while----it does get you in a "Chess state of mind" especially for us club players---lol |
||
|
Solved problems: 35 (97%) Total training time: 0:34:59 Literally just got one wrong, bit annoyed with myself to be honest since it wasn't complicated. I was just more interested in material gain than checkmate. But, as you can see, my time is averaging at 58 seconds per puzzle and I am almost inside the top 100 now. If anything, I've been getting slightly faster! |
||
|
but now i just dropped to the 11th place My rating: 1972 Total attempts: 185 Solved problems: 175 (94%) Total training time: 11:46:59 and i take a lot longer for those puzzles. wen i see/found the solution i first investigate if it really is the solution.. the big catch is that i select only puzzles that -50 to +500 points difference with my rating and the puzzles you get then are very tricky. example you get 2 extremely good moves that both lead to a mate in 4 and you have to pick the best one and i find that some gamble.. i even took for some of those about 2 hours to think it true and then pick the wrong move.. ( i think most of those are now removed from the database so everyone is sprinting up the rankings..) |
||
|
My rating: 1972 Total attempts: 185 Solved problems: 175 (94%) Total training time: 11:46:59 because i solved over 250 puzzles and my training time was about 20 hours and solving percentage about 90% |
||
|
I just started Total attempts: 25 Solved problems: 25 (100%) Total training time: 0:28:38 Mine is set at 400 points above & 400 points below my rating. You can also select limit to classic problems only. |
||
|
Chess Tactics |
||
|
|
||
|
Chess Tactics |
||
|
Ranked: 386 My rating: 1866 Total attempts: 53 Solved problems: 52 (98%) Total training time: 0:56:12 So average was about 64 seconds per puzzle. Might have to have another look when I have more time, it was fun. I guess the biggest problem is that I generally solve chess puzzles in my break at work, and my current job doesn't allow websites like gameknot so I'm stuck doing them from books and newspapers instead. |
||
|
I have lost interest short after my last post..My rating: 2206 Total attempts: 191 Solved problems: 182 (95%) Total training time: 13:34:00 so about 2 more hours.. |
||
|
I use this trainer a lotMy regular GK rating has improved at about the same rate as my tactical rating, but my tactical rating seems to be on average 100 - 150 points higher. Would my GK rating have improved at the same rate without the tactical trainer? Who knows? I probably should split my "study" time better with books videos and tactics trainer... |
||
|
|