|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| From | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
topofstack 31-Aug-11, 08:13 » Report abuse |
 |
||
|
dan1407 31-Aug-11, 12:48 » Report abuse |
VEry elegant |
||
» Report abuse |
|
||
» Report abuse |
... genius ? ... magic ? ... NO ! Sorry , dual in the mainline ! kindly regards Lutz |
||
» Report abuse |
(3) Studies are unsound if there is a method of fulfilling the stipulation which is different from the author's solution, and may also be rendered unsound by serious [16A] duals in the main line, but even in the main line many kinds of duals are normally tolerated. ([16A] The seriousness of a dual is a matter for the judge.) |
||
» Report abuse |
... do we need judges with all their different interpretations ? ... So you need many judges with different opinions and many problems by their different interpretations about the seriousness of duals in the mainlines . Much easier and absolutely clear would be my rule : Only duals in the shorter lines , but no duals in the mainlines . But reforms need always time and so we will see what happens in the future . kindly regards Lutz |
||
» Report abuse |
freundliche Grüße Fred |
||
|
Comment deleted on 08-May-20, 11:48
|
||
» Report abuse |
... there excists different "norms" for chesscompositions ... I don't compose chessproblems under the rules of the WFCC like Kasparow didn't play under the rules of the FIDE since 1993 . kindly regards Lutz |
||
|
camelcluch 08-May-20, 12:28 » Report abuse |
Mister Notorious Plagiarist Then how do you rate puzzles that have no duals in the main lines (not cooked)? like so many that I posted? Always one star?? Is that you have a grudge towards the composer or me or both?? Chesscode+chessmotor+z5321=> break rulers by sharing the same computer freely |
||
» Report abuse |
|
||
» Report abuse |
..."embroiled in the same sort of controversies" ? NO ... any "grudge" ? NO The WFCC was NOT embroiled in the same sort of controversies as FIDE , I said only that "I don't compose chessproblems UNDER THE RULES of the WFCC like Kasparow didn't play UNDER THE RULES of the FIDE since 1993" , because "there excists different norms for chesscompositions". to camelcluch : I haven't any grudge towards you , I only think that it isn't necessary to give an answer to EVERY of your unproven statements . kindly regards Lutz |
||
|
camelcluch 08-May-20, 14:06 » Report abuse |
If you admit that you have nothing against .me , please tell us why you always rate one star , regardless the quality of the problem? Don't you think that shows a lack of respect towards your peers , Sir..? |
||
» Report abuse |
... ratings ... I don't want to be part of endless discussions about ratings , but that I would give always one star is simply wrong . kindly regards Lutz |
||
|
camelcluch 09-May-20, 08:39 » Report abuse |
To don't wanna be part of a logic discussion about your rating system and tjr way you contradict yourself because you have no logic. You say duals in shoryer OK but at tha same time many many of my puzzles with or even without duals are rated by you or your family one star because you are not even consistent with yourself Chesscode+chessmotor+z5321=>>illegal accounts sharing the same computer. Where are the GK authorities to check this?? |
||
» Report abuse |
|
 Account required
Please log in to post comments.
|
My discussions
All discussions
White to move, mate in 4
