|
| ||||||||||||||||

| From | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
hcajg77 29-Aug-12, 08:14 » Report abuse |
Challenging |
||
|
fezzik 29-Aug-12, 08:35 » Report abuse |
Start the puzzle at move 5...Four star difficulty because of move 5, BUT as a puzzle it fails due to having multiple solutions. |
||
|
anarchessism 29-Aug-12, 10:53 » Report abuse |
That is only a failure if... |
||
|
roushanranjan 29-Aug-12, 12:59 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
|
switch0 29-Aug-12, 16:11 |
Comment deleted on 29-Aug-12, 16:12
|
||
|
switch0 29-Aug-12, 16:13 » Report abuse |
had decided on a 4... |
||
» Report abuse |
Nice sequence.. |
||
|
ssgohanf8 29-Aug-12, 17:03 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
|
matthewetaft 29-Aug-12, 20:00 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
|
dan1407 29-Aug-12, 23:12 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
|
hcajg77 30-Aug-12, 12:36 » Report abuse |
dan1407 |
||
|
fezzik 01-Sep-12, 10:02 » Report abuse |
"reality""...you think *reality* should throw up perfectly composed chess problems. Note the description and please stop making specious objections." I have no problem whatsoever with beautiful chess games that have several different winning moves. But these aren't called "great chess positions", these are called "chess puzzles." So, regardless whether it was composed or found, the criteria of only one line forcing mate in the required number of moves is the same. It's not specious at all. |
Account required
Please log in to post comments.
|