|
| ||||||||||||||||||

| From | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
phonybenoni 29-Dec-12, 00:24 » Report abuse |
|||
|
iron_flower 29-Dec-12, 04:17 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
Spelling |
||
|
iron_flower 29-Dec-12, 14:28 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
|
fezzik 29-Dec-12, 19:11 » Report abuse |
Scoring2 Stars Difficulty. It took just a few seconds to see the mate, which is enough time to find it in a blitz game. However, it's not as obvious as other "easy" puzzles and there are other moves to consider. 2.5 Stars (average) Aesthetics I like real games, and this obviously comes from one. We can tell that even without the game reference (Thanks, Kingdawar). White has several ways to win, but even so, the finale involves a nice example of an uncovering (clearance) sac. In this case, it was clearing a line (b1-h7). The position is the sort that might find its way into a large anthology such as "The Encyclopedia of Chess Combinations". Btw, it would be wonderful if the sources of these positions were provided. For me, that would be far more useful than the patronymics of the players involved. I've found several positions in "Anthology of Chess Combinations" and other similar collections published by Informant or "Izdatelctvo Astrel". |
Please log in |
To my mind, in a one-star puzzle I see the solution instantly, almost without conscious thought. Just the position of the pieces is enough to reveal the answer. If I have to think at all, even for a few seconds, it's two stars.
Here, the mate is not instantly obvious. The actual mating move is not the first thing that pops into your head. It wasn't until I started looking at all the checks that it became obvious.
It is simple enough to give 1.5 stars, but since I can't do that it's a two in my book.