|
| ||||||||||||||||||

| From | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
Enjoyed that one, |
||
|
fezzik 14-Feb-13, 06:22 » Report abuse |
Agreed!3 Stars Difficulty 4 Stars Aesthetics |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
great puzzle!!!!!! |
||
|
phonybenoni 14-Feb-13, 09:59 » Report abuse |
![]() When looking at the position, the first thing that came to mind was the Arabian Mate. You know, the one that goes like this: Any time I see a position when a White knight can reach f6 and the rook is on the h-file, this is the first idea I investigate. So I saw the key move quidkly, and that the Black pieces couldn't help out and that Black had no realistic counterattack. In a game, I would have made the move at this point and started to make plans for lunch. But in a puzzle, the goal is not just to checkmate Black, but to do it in a specified number of moves. Often in puzzles, a quiet first move by White will not be correct because Black has some ridiculous checks that string out the game just enough to spoil the solution. So when I saw that Black had a check, I assumed White had to check all the way. That's what usually happens in easy puzzles, anyway. So I started down the wrong paths instead of trusting my instincts, as I would have done in a game. What puzzles can teach well is a disciplined approach to thinking instead of a scattergun one that makes assumptions instead of analyzing carefully. That's always been my weakness, and a reason I'm much lower-rated here than I was in over-the-board play. The systematic approach really pays off in correspondence games, even if it's not as enjoyable as Insta-Solving. |
||
|
yadasampati 14-Feb-13, 12:23 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
|
puzzler77 14-Feb-13, 13:41 » Report abuse |
phonybenoni puzzle #92166.
|
||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
Please log in |