|
| ||||||||||||||||||

| From | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
|
chessikins 19-Jul-12, 01:45 » Report abuse |
Too much drivel.. |
||
|
rawbee 19-Jul-12, 12:15 » Report abuse |
I think its quite good |
||
|
mcmlxxxi 19-Jul-12, 15:01 » Report abuse |
Alright |
||
|
phonybenoni 19-Jul-12, 18:54 » Report abuse |
![]() This boils down to being a drill in visualization, seeing why moves are mates in one variation but not in another. It's not much fun, but when mastering any skill you have to practice the basics until they become second nature. This problem won't teach you a specific mate, but it will help you to recognize mating patterns in the future. That being said, I must admit that I didn't enjoy it. I admired the composer's ingenuity, but I didn't enjoy the experience. But then, enjoyment is not the purpose of a drill. |
||
|
hcajg77 19-Jul-12, 19:55 » Report abuse |
Why the first move? |
||
|
o_gee 19-Jul-12, 20:13 » Report abuse |
the solution isn't a checkmateg6 (say bxc4) nxg4# doesn't make sense because the king can kxc5. |
||
|
phonybenoni 19-Jul-12, 20:21 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
|
o_gee 19-Jul-12, 20:26 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
|
hcajg77 20-Jul-12, 08:48 » Report abuse |
phonybenoni |
Please log in |