chess online

First to solve!

For example, each date and month (regardless of what year you were born) has an astrological connection to the star constellations.
I'm a Sagittarius (Dec 17, 1957) and all of us fall into the chart depending upon our day and month of birth (not our year).
I'm married to a Scorpio who was born Nov 11.
All of us have a sign depending upon the day and month of our birth date.
I am saying to you that since you were born one day out of 365 days of the year you have a sign in the Zodiac that may or may not represent what you think you are!
So, if you are Gemini you have two minds, or if you are Taurus you behave like a Bull, etc.
So, William, what is your birth date and let us here decide if you fit the astrological sign of your birth date (no matter what you think!)
John

And William is a Lion!
What fun!
You don't have to believe any of this. But my first daughter (Tessa) was born August 5, 1994--and what a Leo the Lion she is!

John

Let's take a vote!
All willing to feel that blitzkov is a Leo say yes!
All willing to disagree that blitzkov is a Leo say no!
All willing to say I am a Sagittarius say yes!
All willing to disagree with my birth sign (that I had no control of) say no!

And, if you don't know your sign or want to know your sign just list your birthday (month and year) and I bet if you look into your mannerisms and actions you'll find you match the astrological sign of your birthday!

John

Well, now I want to know kingdawar's birth date to match his personality here. He is very technical and reserved. I'd guess (just guessing) he is Capricorn (21 DEC through 19 January).

However, a Capricorn (I suspect kindawar is a Capricorn) always acts logically and precisely to a "tee" without emotions emitted.

True.
But when I know when someone is born by day and month I find that person to have the qualities and faults of that astrological sign.

I am not a person to flaunt this as a rule but so far I find it to be true.

I believe in the Fourth Gospel (John) and I memorized it verse by verse chapter by chapter in the King James Version of 1611 in 1978.

Later, when I had to translate the original classical (dead language) Greek from the Novum Testamentum by Graeke I found my own memorization mostly true to the latest translations like New American Standard, NIV, Revised Version, and other versions put out to the public since then to be accurate. King James was accurate to a 'tee' except for some phrases where they took English poetic license to make the intended statement.

To date I revere the King James 1611 over all the rest. To really understand King James' 1611 one has to know the time and culture and effort to be true to every word written.

To date the 1611 version of King James is absolutely the finest translation of the original Greek. I don't know about the Old Testament because I went Greek instead of Hebrew when I passed my Ordination Boards for the Presbyterian Church of the USA back in 1987.

However, I can read the ancient manuscripts in ancient Greek for the New Testament. I am unwavering in my faith in the one who gave his life as a ransom for many. It allows me to follow him.

Pilate did not really want to give him up to the crowds outside the "Pavement" in the Roman occupation there. His own wife felt he was innocent but Pilate had to "wash his hands" of him and let Barabbas take the place for him to be freed.

The avatar I show is an interpretation of that event.
I think it portrays it quite well. It moves me enough to make it my avatar.

After all my studies in seminary I think the best film to watch about this event is The Passion:

www.imdb.com

In this film you are closest to the Sacred History of Jesus from the Gospel of John.