GameKnot: play online chess

Flame Wars forum
(archived) << - < - > - >>

From

Message

wolfstrike

2/09/2003
22:15:52
[ report this post ]

Subject: komei

Message:
if you spent half as much time defending regular good people as you do defending saddam hussien,you would be a great person.

astinkyfart

2/09/2003
22:49:16
[ report this post ]

i must say

Message:
this is true.

pawntificator

2/10/2003
02:25:41
[ report this post ]

It takes more

Message:
than being a defender of the people to be a great person. If he defended regular good people then I would say he is alright, but not great.

boscoe

2/10/2003
02:26:09
[ report this post ]

wolfstrike

Message:
Is Komei not defending the regular good people of Iraq?

wolfstrike

2/10/2003
03:19:18
[ report this post ]

Message:
in my opinion ,no

komei has no middle ground,he supports any dictator that hates the USA,no matter how bad they are.(except hitler of course)

it is true that the USA is mainly motivated by money,but komei is always 100% against us.

he hates the usa mostly because of exaggerations and prejudices.

i am willing to bet that if komei lost some kind of investment in iraq because of saddam,he would be the first one to tell us why we need to get him out.

deathray

2/10/2003
05:51:34
[ report this post ]

Simon and Garfunkel said

Message:
All lies and jests, still a man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest.

komei

2/10/2003
12:02:11
[ report this post ]

I haven't been 'defending' Saddam...

Message:
...just displaying the massive majority view of the world on what should happen.

Sor ONCE in its history, France is doing the right thing!

I fully support the Franco-German-Russian stance against the Bully-Bush boys saying "do this do that" - both the UN and NATAO are JOINT alliances - USA doesn't own or rule them. The USA can stick its own weapons in Turkey (if Turkey lets 'em) since if there is a war, only the USA will be doing it (And maybe weak Blair, but UK people certainly don't want it).

Saddam is co-operating thanks to Hans Blick's persistance; non-violent discussions are working well - Hans just needs a few months to check out all the latest USA 'allegations' - the USA doesn't want to disclose intelligence relating to the biological weapons it sold to Iraq (and Iran) in the 80's under Reagan, but they MUST DISCLOSE this information to the inspectors or face consequences! The UN and NATO will throw the USA out if they do NOT comply.

Well done, Chirac and Putin. Blair may not be strong enough to stand up to the Bully Boy Bush Dictatorship, but you guys are.

Once again, as in WW2, Russia is playing the CRUCIAL role. Keep it up, peaceful heroes.

fortune

2/10/2003
13:56:26
[ report this post ]

Komei

Message:
Do you hate the USA? If you do, I don't think it's really fair that you hate the whole country. There are some people here who believe there should be peace.

komei

2/10/2003
15:28:23
[ report this post ]

No, I don't hate the majority of the USA...

Message:
...who say that there should be NO action without the UN saying so.

I hate warmongering greedy barbarians who want war for economical and political reasons though, like Bush and the DieHARD Xtian fanatics in southern states who kiss his butt all the way to the oilfields.

hamlet

2/10/2003
16:01:40
[ report this post ]

komei

Message:
you forgot Chancellor Schroder :(

drcorbett

2/10/2003
16:28:36
[ report this post ]

Komei

Message:
Wow, you sure "Know" lots about the States for a European...

deltaforce

2/10/2003
22:59:18
[ report this post ]

Message:
Actually, the U.S. is not mainly motivvated by money. Some of the motivations are:

1. 3,000.00 dead people om 9-11

2. The proliferation of weapons in dictator states all over the world. Now Iran is mining nuclear materials. Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. North Korea is one of the worst but the reason rhe U.S. is staying out of North Korea is not oil but China. Other small countries are now gaining the power to unleash nuclear weapons which is the greatest fear and ultimate disaster.

4. Out of control spreading terrorism.

5. Protection of markets and free trade and oil supplies meaning in simple terms, money.

6. A belief that democracy worldwide will promote stability and human rights ultimately. Democracies never go to war with each other!

hamster (#)

2/11/2003
11:55:52
[ report this post ]

Message:
errmm i think that it hasn't been proven that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. As i hear it iraq and Bin laden don't like each other that much. Do you think that maybe this is the government propaganda clouding your reasoning? This is a serious question how are you people making your minds up about this war - purely through watching tv or trying to do some research yourselves that might not be so biased. i realise it is nigh on impossible to read something that hasn't been written without bias but come on people have a mind of your own.

baseballman3000 (#)

2/11/2003
13:49:28
[ report this post ]

ahh Iraq

Message:
you know France, Germany, Russia, ect... are right! I mean why shouldnt we trust someone who just lied to the UN a couple weeks ago in its "all-inclusive" weapons report? They said they didnt have any WMDs and now that the US called their bluff they are willing to admit, ok maybe we have a couple... Wouldnt you trust Iraq? I mean Sadam is such an honest person!! I mean it is a good thing not to support your allies right? Horay for the spineless France!!! Hip-hip horayy!

mormel12 (#)

2/11/2003
23:52:27
[ report this post ]

baseballman3000

Message:
i see a very big difference between being against war and saying sadam is a reliable person.
i hope you can see that difference too.
greetings.

baseballman3000 (#)

2/12/2003
13:47:46
[ report this post ]

mormel

Message:
how can I see the difference when that is the issue at hand? The "peaceful triumverate" took Sadam's weapons report at face value and said, "See he has no WMDs there is no need for war." Guess what Sadam has now admitted that he does have WMDs, just a "couple" though. He cannot be trusted and would have nothing to hide if it were for defensive purposes. Would you want someone to know you bought a gun for a bankrobber since he didnt have eneough money to do it himself?

komei (#)

2/12/2003
15:04:25
[ report this post ]

Bush writes his motives for USA to invade Iraq...

Message:
1) Kontrowl ov oyl 2 stabi... st... saiv my fayling eekonomi.

2) Pee pill wil vowt 4 mee inn the neckt eelekshon.

3) It wil bee a grate stepp inn mi glowbull Con qwest.

Signed WW3 Busch

Post a reply to this message: