Flame Wars forum
(archived)   << - < - > - >>
FromMessage
komei (#)

2/14/2003
12:25:55

[ report this post ]
Subject: Blix...

Message:
...is impressed by Iraqi progress so far. He just needs more time, so BACK OFF WW3 BUSH! This BUSH induced 'crisis' can be resolved peacefully.

The Bush and minions can concentrate on REAL issues of danger such as ISRAEL (which is in breach of 68 UN SANCTIONS - send in the troops THERE Mr BUSH), N. Korea, Pakistan, India etc. etc...


astinkyfart (#)

2/14/2003
12:51:19

[ report this post ]
we have fought

Message:
a war with iraq already. they had nato resolutions to meet they have not. americans died fighting for the liberation of kuwait against saddam , why can we not enforce now what he has not done for the last 10 years. this is hardly a rush. as far as israel, pakistan, and india are concerned these countries arent hard line like saddam. north korea will be dealt with by china which is good , but i bet no one will bad mouth the chinese for this. but then again if they dont. we will deal with north korea.

komei (#)

2/14/2003
16:33:13

[ report this post ]
ISRAEL...

Message:
Is FAR MORE HARDLINE than Saddam!

North Korea is a SERIOUS THREAT ot west coast USA states!

Wake up!


baseballman3000 (#)

2/14/2003
18:26:14

[ report this post ]
xomei

Message:
without this US pressure Blix would not be seeing any positive progress with the Iraqi government.

astinkyfart (#)

2/14/2003
18:26:25

[ report this post ]
you wake up

Message:
i agree about n. korea. read the post. israel is not hard line they just dont take suicide bombers and terrorist threats laying down.

komei (#)

2/14/2003
22:08:02

[ report this post ]
Israel...

Message:
www.markfiore.com/animation/revo.html


baseballman3000 (#)

2/14/2003
23:12:53

[ report this post ]


Message:
that was pretty good ^^^^^

that guy comes up with some funny stuff


hamlet (#)

2/15/2003
00:35:04

[ report this post ]


Message:
that was very funny. thank you for sharing komei

af16stang66 (#)

2/16/2003
08:28:59

[ report this post ]


Message:
komie, North Korea is very aware of the
consequences of taking some sort of action against
out west coast, and I don't think that the military
leaders of North Korea are willing to turn their
country in to a parkinglot five times over, because
that is what would happen. They are primarly using
these weapons as a deturant from attack and as
political leverage... which isn't working that well (the
political leverage that is) In that region you have
the presence or 4 stable nuclear powers (one of
which boarders them) and 2 other nation with a
powerful conventional force. It is in the best intrest
of North Korea to not launch.


peppe_l (#)

2/16/2003
08:40:03

[ report this post ]
Yep, I agree

Message:
But if nuclear weapons of North Korea arent a real threat to USA, how can Iraq be a threat? Especially considering Iraq had WMDs/chemical weapons (and much stronger army) during the Gulf War but they werent used against USA, not even for defensive purposes...

Saddam knows the "unwritten rules" of wars against USA - he may use Iraqi army to defend but he cant attack or use WMDs/chemical weapons (even IF he has them). He knows the consequences of 1) striking back on US soil 2) using powerful weapons to defend his country : Iraq -> parking lot.


knightwolf (#)

2/16/2003
10:00:43

[ report this post ]
komei?

Message:
For what reason do you think India's name should come in that list alongside those countries....
Please explain more on your perception.


a_professional_idiot (#)

2/16/2003
12:42:47

[ report this post ]
knightwolf

Message:
Pakistan and India border each other.
Pakistan and India are both Nuclear capable countries.
Pakistan and India are very angry at each other and have been on the verge of an armed conflict for quite some time.
You do the math.


komei (#)

2/16/2003
15:47:48

[ report this post ]
knightwolf...

Message:
...see a_professional_idiot's post :-)


zoobrenok (#)

2/16/2003
16:11:26

[ report this post ]
a_professional_idiot

Message:
I think Pakistan and India are smart enough not to use those nukes.

skeeterss0 (#)

2/16/2003
17:18:11

[ report this post ]
I agree zoo

Message:
because the fallout from the nukes would travel over china and their multi billion person population would be rather po'ed

knightwolf (#)

2/18/2003
06:31:11

[ report this post ]
to whomever...

Message:
It is really surprising that people take India's name in the same breath as that of those irresponsible nuclear loose cannons like Pakistan and Korea...
India has always had a stable democratic government.The others are totalitarian/states or under dictatorship.
Pakistan could not forget the humiliation suffered in the 1972 Indo -Pak war and still seeks revenge.China supplied nuke tech to Pak so that it could neutralize India's emerging potential as an Asian economic power.Pak traded some of those weapons with Korea in exchange for Korea's superior missile technology. The funding for Pak in its acquisition of nukes was by Saudi Arabia so that the Islamic bomb could be made..
DOES ANYBODY EVEN KNOW THAT ALMOST 12-15 TOP NUCLEAR SCIENTISTS IN PAKISTAN ARE MISSING SINCE THE RAIDS ON AFGHANISTAN.CAN ANYBODY GUESS WHAT THEY MIGHT BE ASSEMBLING AND FOR WHOM?
Contrary to public perception, public support isfor the Taliban in Pakistan...and there is only hatred for the US.US is sleeping with the enemy!
India on the other hand has not gone about selling and exchangin nukes with everybody.Dont you see that once Pak has acquired nukes, they'll find their way into the hands of every Arab country!Then , there will no longer be a problem between Ind and pak , but between pak and the west!!
On the other hand what can you possibly accuse India of?That is why I said that its not Ind but pak that people shud pay attention to!
Now you do the advanced math, a_professionalidiot!




Post a reply to this message:

Please adjust your bookmarks to point to the new forums!