| From | Message |
| yanm 4/02/2007 23:45:22 [ report this post ] |
Subject: Consutation Team: yanm & raskerino #2Message: |
| raskerino 4/03/2007 19:06:37 [ report this post ] | Message: |
| yanm 4/05/2007 02:01:25 [ report this post ] | vacationsMessage: Have a nice Easter, --Yannick |
| raskerino 4/10/2007 18:49:49 [ report this post ] | Message: just thought I'd put up a link to the game so I can find it more easily. |
| yanm 4/11/2007 01:22:34 [ report this post ] | 12...Nc4Message: |
| raskerino 4/11/2007 13:09:22 [ report this post ] | Message: |
| yanm 4/12/2007 02:58:04 [ report this post ] | So lets go for 13.Qd3Message: |
| raskerino 4/12/2007 06:12:12 [ report this post ] | Message: |
| yanm 4/16/2007 23:32:39 [ report this post ] | duh they played 13...Qc7Message: My quick analysis: this impedes Nc6 and starts an counter-attack on the c-file. Now, I think that we have two options. 1) keep the bishops' pair and an play 14.Bf2 and 2) continue our pawns' storm with 14.g5. |
| raskerino 4/17/2007 14:16:41 [ report this post ] | Message: a) 14.Bh3 does prepare g5 and it places pressure on the weak e6 square (with g5-g6 and Nf4 we weaken it even more). However, it does seem like it brings it away from being a potential defender of our king. Another nice feature though is it does connect rooks. Another possible drawback is that it may give them a target on the h file. b) 14.Rg1 also prepares the g5 advance. While I'd tend to prefer Bh3, this move seems less commital, though it creats less threats too. c) Finally 14.Bf2 seems fine and I always like bishops... but it's SLOW. It also cuts down on control of g5 (though we'll still have enough). I think (unless you spot a problem) my vote would be with 14.Bh3 but I'd be reasonable comfortable with any of the above moves. One thing I should mention: I think the c file's a big danger- and I feel we may have to act quickly so that our attack comes first. |
| yanm 4/25/2007 23:51:50 [ report this post ] | 14.Bh3Message: |
| raskerino 4/26/2007 15:20:01 [ report this post ] | Message: |
| yanm 4/27/2007 06:49:56 [ report this post ] | questionMessage: In my opinion, we can safely play 15.g5 since opening the d file will benefit us more than them (their king hasn't yet castled)... but I may be wrong :/ |
| raskerino 4/27/2007 13:09:53 [ report this post ] | Message: something like 14... d5 15.g5! hxg5 16.hxg5 Nd7 17.g6 looks very promising. |
| yanm 4/29/2007 01:00:53 [ report this post ] | What about 14...e5Message: |
| raskerino 4/29/2007 08:34:27 [ report this post ] | Message: a) 15.Nb3 leaves the knight on the queenside but it might give them free tempo with a5-a4. For example 15.Nb3 a5 16.Bf2 Ba6! seems very, very bad for us. b) 15.Nf5 g6 16.Ng3 definitely looks problematic too. So what I think we should go with is 15.Nf5 where somthing like 15... g6 16.Nfg3 a5 17.g5 hxg5 18.Bxg5 Be7 19.f4 might follow, and we're not too bad. I'm probably being overly optimistic (again), but I'd hate to see that a pawn marching down our throats with tempo. It's lucky that they can't play 17... Ba6 18.Qb3 Rc8 'cause our bishop covers that square, though 18...Nb6 threatens to trap our queen (with both ... Bc4 and ... a4), luckily we can rip it with our bishop, so that's not a huge problem. They've got a lot of scary tactics, but I think with a timely g5 and f4 push we'll be fine. |
| yanm 4/30/2007 23:02:03 [ report this post ] | They played 14...Bd7Message: So my candidate moves are: 15.g5 aggressive (maybe overly optimistic) 15.Bf3 freeing some little space for the queen and defending the f pawn (maybe too slow) 15.Qb3 avoiding possible complications (maybe also too slow) |
| raskerino 5/01/2007 14:11:30 [ report this post ] | Message: 15.Bf2 seems playable and kind of useful as it defends the f3 square, but my fave of those choice is definitely: 15.g5 displacing their knight, and opening up the kingside, if something like 15... hxg6 16.hxg5 Ng8? 17.Bxe6 is possible. While that's not likely, I'm trying to show some of the sting of 15.g5. Also, as it gains tempo and I don't see too good a square for their knight I don't see a problem. One worry is that we can't play g6 very effectively as Ne5! forks queen and pawn on g6. So I guess I support 15.g5 but I think 15.b3 is worth a look, it's weakening, problematic but if it gives us an extra turn or two it could be worthwhile. |
| yanm 5/17/2007 22:51:08 [ report this post ] | So lets go for 15.g5Message: |
| yanm 6/13/2007 22:50:20 [ report abuse ] | So, they played 15....Nh5Message: |
| raskerino 6/15/2007 10:38:15 [ report abuse ] | Message: |
| yanm 7/09/2007 23:11:31 [ report abuse ] | Link to new gameMessage: |
| yanm 7/26/2007 10:25:26 [ report abuse ] | 16....Ne5Message: I was thinking about 17.bxf7+ followed by 18.Qb3. What do you think? Best, yanm |
| raskerino 7/26/2007 11:36:39 [ report abuse ] | Message: your plan seems great, the queen looks good on b3, and a5-a4 seems slow compared to out pressure on e6. |
| yanm 8/06/2007 08:44:02 [ report abuse ] | 18... Qc4Message: |
| yanm 8/06/2007 10:49:02 [ report abuse ] | Queen exchangeMessage: |
| raskerino 8/06/2007 11:52:59 [ report abuse ] | Message: |
| yanm 8/12/2007 06:19:42 [ report abuse ] | Message: On the second line: our Bishop on f4 doesn't seem right. He is in the path of our f pawn. And we exchange our more or less good Knight on e2 for their rim Knight. I vote for 19.f4 and propose to enter the subsequent replies as conditionals. Any additional thoughts? |
| raskerino 8/14/2007 16:43:58 [ report abuse ] | Message: I'm on vacation, so I can't get on too much, it'd be great to get more PMs notifying me that there's an update. |
| raskerino 8/15/2007 16:48:33 [ report abuse ] | Message: maybe 21.f5 exploiting the fact that 21...e5 is not an option. 21... exf5 22.Nxf5 with a threat on d6 (though e4 is weak). d6 seems weaker than e4 and I wouldn't envy their king. Alternatively 21.Rdf1 preparing a breakthrough seems alright, if 21... Nxh4 we have 22.Bxe6. |
| yanm 8/25/2007 08:06:49 [ report abuse ] | So they played as expectedMessage: Lets wait and see... |
| raskerino 9/06/2007 14:17:50 [ report abuse ] | Message: So my candidate moves are f5 and e5. I'll give some analysis later. |
| raskerino 9/07/2007 15:04:29 [ report abuse ] | Message: e5 has two continuations: 22... dxe5 23.dxe5 where we get the f file and if the king goes to e7 we might have an eventual Bc5+ to great effect, I definitely like the look of that position, as e6 is much more pressure than e5. 22... d5 23.f5 looks attractive, the only thing to watch out for is Ng3. I like a passed e pawn a lot when their rooks are unconnected. 22.f5 is looking a little less interesting to me as I don't see a ton after 22... e5. Something like 22.f5 e5 23.Ne2 Bc6 makes our position look clumsier. So I'm thinking e5. |
| yanm 9/11/2007 12:42:00 [ report abuse ] | sorryMessage: |
| yanm 9/22/2007 00:13:34 [ report abuse ] | 23...d5Message: 24.f5 seems good to me. Then if they play 23...Ng3 24. fxe6+ Bxe6 25. Bxe6+ ... 26. Rg3? |
| raskerino 9/22/2007 09:27:13 [ report abuse ] | Message: a) 24.Rg1 leaves there knight without a square, the idea would be Bg4 forcing g6 and leaving their pawns in shambles. But 24... g6 seems a strong responst, so scratch that idea. b) 24.Rhe1 seems a nice square for the rook preparing an f5 push, but again g6 seems adequate. c) so that brings me to 24.f5, it seems like we need to make the break now or ...g6 will stop it. 24... exf5 seems forced and we have a choice, probably 25.Bxf5 Bxf5 26.Nxf5 Ke6 27.Rhf1 and it seems like they can probably grab on e5. So what about 24.f5 exf5 25.Rhe1? Nope seems like that loses a pawn too after 25... Re8 26.Bf2 g6. d) so I have a different idea, I think it gives a slight edge, but nothing so aggressive as 24.f5 which I can't bring myself to see working. 24.Bg4 Ng3 (24...g6 25.Bxh5 gxh5 26.Rf1 with the idea of creating a past e pawn with an f5 advance and weakening d5) 25.Rg1 Ne4 (25... Nf5 26.Nxf5 exf5 27.Bh5+ is probably winning as d5 is bad and our e5 pawn is great) now we have 26.f5 against trying to make the break 26...exf5 27.Nxf5 seems pretty good. We're threatening Nxh6+ and Rxd5 so they've got two move: d1) 27... Bxf5 28.Bxf5 seems excellent for us. d2) 27... Be6 28.Bh5+ Kg8 29.Nxh6+ when delightfully enough 29... Kh7 30.Bg6 is mate. So yeah, I think 24.Bg4 is strongest. |
| yanm 9/23/2007 05:39:56 [ report abuse ] | Again not much timeMessage: |
| yanm 10/03/2007 06:47:29 [ report abuse ] | They played Ng3Message: |
| raskerino 10/03/2007 15:49:31 [ report abuse ] | Message: a) 25... Nxh1 26.fxe6+ Ke7 27.exd7 Ng3 28.Nc6+ 1-0 b1) 25... Nxf5 26.Bxf5 exf5 27.Rhe1 (there might be better) Re8 and I don't see white having enough, so maybe: b2) 26.Rhf1 g6 (though actually they don't really need the defense as they're up a pawn and if we win f5 they'll have the useful ...Ke6 move) 27.h5 Kg7 and again, black seems to be just good enough. c) 25... exf5 26.Bf3 seems at first quite strong (26... Be6? 27.Nxe6 Kxe6 28.Bxd5+ 1-0) but they have the safe move 26... Ne4 and again I'm not sure what to do for us. So unless you have some clever ideas I favor the simple Rhg1. |
| yanm 10/04/2007 01:42:36 [ report abuse ] | Go for itMessage: |
| yanm 10/20/2007 02:31:20 | They played 25... Ne4Message: a) 26.f5 b) 26.Bf3 I would favour the second solution. Their knight is now in a too nice spot and I feel we have to dislodge it. |
| raskerino 10/21/2007 08:43:33 | Message: 26.Bf3 is strong, they must leave the knight where it is and we will have a permanent target on e4 to attack. My issue with the move is it allows them to connect rooks. 26.Bf3 Bc5 (26... Nc5 27.f5) 27.Bxe4 dxe4 28.Rge1 Rh(a?)d8 and they've gotten a bit more co-ordinated. 26.f5 is definitely more forcing, so it's easier to analyze far ahead 26... exf5 (forced) 27.Nxf5 Bxf5 (basically forced as d5 is attacked and if they try to defend d5 with Be6 we have moves I've given above, I guess 27... Bc6 is an alternative but we have the simple 28.Nd4 winning the c8-h3 diagonal, we're ready to start pushing the e pawn and they still have not connected rooks, oh, yeah, their king is bad too) 28.Bxf5 and now they do have difficulty finding the right way to connect rooks 28... Rd8 to defend d5 and now the tricky 29.Bb6 and 29.Rg6 are probably the two main moves. Rg6 wins the a pawn for sure, and 29.Bb6 leads to a short chase which also seems to favor us 29... Rb8 30.Bc7 Rb7 31.Bd8! Rb8 32.e6+ Ke8 33.Bc7 Rb7 34.Be5 where d5 is still hanging. I guess I see more promise in this line though I think both yield advantage, this is probably a juncture where we should argue over which is better if you see more promise in Bf3. |
| raskerino 11/21/2007 13:46:52 | Message: |
| yanm 1/20/2008 05:02:43 | We are finally thereMessage: As you have foresaw, the position is a bit awkward for both sides... |
| yanm 1/30/2008 11:59:30 | 17th moveMessage: or, alternatively, we can give a in-between check with 17. Rf1+. |
| raskerino 2/12/2008 13:17:11 | Message: |
Post a reply to this message: |
| [ Log out | Contact us | Site map | Rules and Policies ] |
| © 2000-2007 GameKnot online chess. All rights reserved. |