| From | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Interesting Ladder DynamicsMy won game did not count for anything because it was won before algol won his. algol is now number 1...all hail algol! |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
King for a few minutes |
||
|
baronderkilt 11-Jul-09, 19:52 |
I think What's the winning strategy guys? (If you are giving away any secrets, I won't tell ! |
||
|
StrategyI would think: It you are in the process of climbing, pick fast moving opponents (the players characteristic "Average time per move" in the hovering tool-tip comes in handy here) as far above you as allowed and win. Watch the game positions and try to be ready for the challenge when a suitable opponent comes below 5 games. But do not pick too many games, these may pull you down later when you have gone up above that position. The trick is of course that you need to win... Have a look at the ladder history of some of the quick risers. On the top of the slow ladder nothing much was happening when I last checked, we are just trying to keep our balance I suppose... |
||
|
baronderkilt 11-Jul-09, 22:36 |
Ah Great~!Thx for the input. Congrats to you and lighttotheright also, on reaching King of the mountain. |
||
|
I'm absolutely positive that I will be dethroned eventually But I guess I should not be so negative. I can always get it back unless I lose to someone far beneath me. Oh the royal pain of it all! It's best enjoy it while it lasts. |
||
|
lighttotheright 14-Jul-09, 21:22 |
Deleted by lighttotheright on 14-Jul-09, 21:23.
|
||
|
Maybe you rise by one anyway. But if they were much higher than you before they left, did you get short changed? or what. Maybe the same thing that has been happening to me @ the #1 spot will occur. The win doesn't count. Boo hoo!! Now I don't feel so bad. |
||
|
Another interesting dynamicon the ladder. Some with higher ratings, some with lower. If I had thought about it more carefully, all of my challenges would have been against players with much higher ratings. Because though I may win the games against the lower rated players, and move up temporarily; I doubt very much that in the long term I will climb the ladder above 30. But in the long term, I think things will work out in a good way. There are many players below me with significantly higher ratings than me. I am hoping that they will challenge me as I finish each game; this should mean that I have some excellent opportunities to play against very highly rated players. I would expect these will be players who joined the ladder later and are looking for an easy win to make a big jump. I may not win any of those games, but I will do my best to play a good solid game, and the experience should be instructive for me. |
||
|
baronderkilt 15-Jul-09, 10:32 |
The really interesing dynamic for me .... Oh well, whatever I got into it now. And hope to keep climbing losses to under a hundred Elo loss. What will be will be. |
||
|
Another interesting dynamic"3. If the winning player has the higher position, they [sic] are moved one position up and the losing player is moved one position down." Currently cheeky_knight is playing 16 ladder games against mostly 1400 rated players. Since she's at the #5 ladder position, all she needs to do is win two-thirds of her games to reach #1. |
||
|
baronderkilt 16-Jul-09, 05:30 |
Or ... All the tension, the drama ~ ! |
||
|
But once you get to number one, all those extra won games don't count. So no single person will be able to maintain #1 position for long. So once you are within the top 2 or 3, there no sense in challenging the status on the guy in the #1 spot -- so says the 'King of the mountain'!! It's almost an exercise in futility. I won't let you keep number one for long, unless I drop significantly. |
||
|
fwiwThomas |
||
|
You weren't supposed to tell them that. It is easy to stay near the top by playing lower rated people. Being much higher rated than you, I don't have to worry as much about losing a game to one of them. But as the higher rated people rise toward the top, it will be increasingly difficult to find the easy mark. Me, I'm not delaying any game. I'm just winning when I can. By playing the lower rated, they get experience; I get an abnormally long winning streak with no additional points. However, I do get the opportunity to find some really interesting mating combinations. One was in the middle of the board without the help from my Queen or rook - bishops and knights only. I'm contributing to the process by helping the higher rated people rise by not playing them. By playing them instead, I can delay their rise if I delay my moves --unless they play the weaker players as well. I'm not devious enough to deliberately delay my games. That would be boring. So I just play. Don't delay, just play. |
||
|
New queen of the ladder |
||
|
tag1153 16-Jul-09, 21:29 |
Deleted by tag1153 on 16-Jul-09, 21:31.
|
||
|
tag1153 16-Jul-09, 21:39 |
Deleted by tag1153 on 16-Jul-09, 21:39.
|
||
|
baronderkilt 16-Jul-09, 23:08 |
On the Fast Ladder . . . Now that is what you can really call dynamic MOVING UP the ladder ~!! |
||
|
|
||
|
............... |
||
|
shema_yisrael 19-Jul-09, 16:52 |
You are all doomed...to play these games and not finish any, simply letting my momentum carry me to the top. Bwah, hah, hah! |
||
|
I'm back to #3 |
||
|
Sitting duck |
||
|
... |
||
|
baronderkilt 29-Jul-09, 22:35 |
Aha~! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * BUT ... It has not escaped me that You Can still type and breathe~! So Why No Move !? * * * * * * * Oh wait, you are not here. Okay then; despite knowing my position is free of weakness and bursting with potential; just out of kindness [ and because you are not here, so I can bother you until you send a move ], I will go ahead & offer a Draw . . . "You're Welcome" ... }8-D |