chess online

chess online
GameKnot related: people taking the full amount of time per move to delay lost games
« Back to forum
Pages: 12
Go to the last post
FromMessage
shlam16
15-Jul-11, 01:46

people taking the full amount of time per move to delay lost games
this is a pet peeve of mine, i cant stand it when people timeout in lost positions, but even worse is when they use their entire time for each move, simply to make the game go on as long as humanly possible.. ive even got one gronk who has used vacation days to make it go even longer (mwenyasoft), and i know it wasnt a real vacation because i frequently saw him online and was able to cancel the postponement because he was moving in his other games..

i am STILL playing said game against mwenyasoft, he is 3 moves away from a forced checkmate, which my conditional moves will take care of, but i thought i would bring it up incase anyone who has any power on this site is looking.. perhaps there should be a feature on this site whereby situations such as the one i have outlined can be declared wins, much like the masters of old would announce "mate in .. moves" .. this site has powerful chess engines, whats to stop there being a function (the same as that for creating chess puzzles) whereby you can show the system that there is nothing for the opponent to do to avoid mate, therefore have the game declared as won..

i know this will likely be unnoticed, and even if it is, nothing will be done about it, but it still helped to have a rant..
lighttotheright
15-Jul-11, 02:42

People make mistakes. Just because it seems to be a win or loss, doesn't mean it actually is. You have to prove it.

I've seen some players do similar thing to me. It's not really a problem unless the game parameters are set for too long. Conditional moves do help manage these situations.

Be patient. Usually somebody that abuses time parameters like that are very close to timing out in some of their games. Regardless, everyone is allowed by the rules to use up as much time available on the clock. If they want to wait until the last hour to make their moves, then they are allowed to do it.

If it really bother you that much, then become a paying member so that you can play more games. More games should keep you busy.
shlam16
15-Jul-11, 03:21

i am a paying member... however i feel like taking a break from this site and i am waiting for my games to end, this one being my last one left.. and if you care to look at it you will see that it doesnt 'seem to be a win or a loss' it is however an 'unavoidable mate in 3' with forced moves, yet the gronk i am playing makes one move every 3 days (to which a conditional move greets him) and then he pisses off again for 3 more days (all the while moving in his other games).. if it werent for the fact that i am planning a hiatus from this website it would be a minor annoyance, but since i want to get away from being obliged to check here every day, it is quite inconvenient
b123
15-Jul-11, 04:06

Since you set up conditional moves with a force mate in 3, there's no need to check every day...
You know you won that game! Take your break and check back in 2 weeks or so.

It's indeed annoying and not polite to stretch lost games forever but it happens all of us. The
only thing you can do is setting up conditional moves and put him on your ignore list.

A reason for such misbehavior can be that he is in a winning streak, or almost at 6 month high,
or all time high, ...

shlam16
15-Jul-11, 04:24

you make valid points b123, and i know what you are saying is true, but the reason for my posting here was in the hope that someone who has anything to do with the running of this site could consider the function that i mentioned above, ie, if there is a forced mate, run it through an engine like that of the chess puzzles and if it is truly unavoidable (and the winning player can prove this) then allow games to be declared won, it is just my opinion how to deal with the gronks who do that kind of thing..
tactical_abyss
15-Jul-11, 05:47

Wisdom,patience and some humor on this subject:
Hi shlam16,
I agree with you on your gripe and hear you!But take it from a well seasoned corresp player,there are different ways to look at things.First of all,its not wise to mention your opponents name in the forums,just say,"one of my current opponents".I've seen things happen in various forums on many chess sites,that even if your correct,arguments can initiate,strings can be dissolved and even both players can have their message or forum privileges suspended.

Just have what the seasoned corresp players have:Extreme patience!

Your opponent for example,may also disagree with you stating that he his simply following the rule guidelines,likes to take his time analyzing even a lost position and dosen't like his name being spread around in the forums.Plus,does your opponent truly know it IS a lost position?Does he have in front of him those 3 conditional moves?Those conditional moves are not shown to him are they?Players taking vacations/T.O.'s and other things like you mention,happen all the time,even to me.I had a player beg me to play the white stating that it was only fair that he play the white since I beat him playing the white months ago.I said "ok",as long as he decides to move fast since I am squeezing him in on my game limit and want to finish my present games fairly quickly like the other players are.Well,he made his first 3 moves very fast(opening moves)then suddenly decided to take a big vacation/T.O. right after the 3 moves where I cannot cancel the game!Thats his given right to do so,but you get the point!

But putting that aside for the time being,if the game is "over" through conditional moves then great!Don't even bother looking at it again.Here's how to think about your situation:
"Well,I have that game in the bag and my opponent will lose.Let him take ALL the time he wants!"He can run,but he can't hide!!Just laugh at him!Its pie on his face,not yours,right?
And simply do not play him again,if possible!

Not long ago,I had a player in a conditional move mating net of 12!!!!!!I checked it several times to make sure.I even messaged him and brashly told him...."mate in 12!"He really slowed down then!I said,take all the time you want!Take 2 months if you like,use up all your vacation and TO's!But it is still mate in 12 max!Then,I never did check back with the game until I observed my message light blinking a few weeks later.I knew what that message was even before I opened it."Game over,checkmate".My opponent did not resign,but wanted to play the mate through for a "learning"experience.Well,good!See?So have patience,shalam!

GK will never have a declared win,even on a conditional move string in a definite mate simply due to the fact that it is a players right to examine the mate in his own way(if he even really knows its a mate,not because someone told him)or because he wants to play other games and put yours on the back burner.Your point win will come either way,shalam!
And always remember,you can cancel a players T.O. when that option appears above the gameboard.

Well,enough of my ramblings!

Good chess to all and please have patience against the "stallers"!!

Look at it in a humorous way!Envision a turkey running from you in an open field with no where for the turkey to hide.Your sitting there comfortably with your long powered 460 weatherby rifle with a long range laser site on it.Let the turkey run for as long as it wants away from you,let him run in circles,let him eat some grain,let him sleep,let him mate with other turkeys.Then you say to yourself or shout to the turkey....."are you done yet"?Then raise your rifle and shoot!Game over....mate!!!

TA
amacivn
16-Jul-11, 03:03

Shalm16
I agree on the whole with your rant, it is annoying when people postpone or delay games, I'm currently in a tournament were its happening, we just have to learn patience and never play that person again,
I do however have an annoying habit of playing games to the end ! win ;lose or draw does not matter to me , it all depends on what my opponent plays like and i do tend to learn from my defeats
yanm
16-Jul-11, 04:42

Well it's psychological warfare
They're within their rights to play at the last moment though I agree it's kind of un-gentleman-ish.

And for time to time it works out well for them. I indeed recently hanged a queen against such opponent in an
otherwise totally won solution. I was so disgusted that I resigned directly even if there was some drawing
chances.

In the end, we should learn patience and do with it...
tactical_abyss
16-Jul-11, 10:32

I personally stay out of tournaments for a couple of reasons.One of the reasons is that I tend to mainly pick and choose who I want to play.In tourneys,you can be stuck with just about anyone,right?I even decline alot of incoming challenges or even some players that accept my game posts!Why?Because if I see or get reports on stalling,T.O's and other things like too perfect a record,even bad messaging ect,I won't play them!Most of my games are with 2 day time controls,so this in itself,will atleast minimize some of the so called stalls.There are other main reasons,however.I do a minimum of 10 game research on any perspective future opponent before I play them...looking for weakness and strength's in past games of theirs.
Many players do not do this,which is a mistake!That is if you want to possibly gain an edge on a player.If he was beaten in 10 Sicilian games and won 2 Ruy Lopez games playing the same color in his most recent game history,guess what i'm going to play?It certainly would not be a Ruy!Dosen't take a rocket scientist to figure out that one!But in themematic tourneys and more,sometimes you don't have freedom of choice!I do however!

Best,
TA
amacivn
16-Jul-11, 15:49

TA,
Believe it or not even @ my level i have a study of my opponent's , doesn't always work because i don't do it to win but for the type of game ,and in the past tend to make a stupid mistake - which i'm just ironing out,
I have played in two tournaments here and done so so , @ the time it was to play higher rated players than myself to test my rating. But i had pc problems and timed out !?!!?
But you are right all my problems seem to happen in tournaments , i.e postponements , wonder how bad it would be if we were playing for prizes,some players wont lose graciously

regards Neil
tactical_abyss
16-Jul-11, 15:59

yes,prizes....i suggested that in another post....and got shot down!

TA
kingdawar
16-Jul-11, 18:07

FAQ 25, 26

gameknot.com
brigadecommander
18-Jul-11, 13:54

Fear
it could be fear! or a inability to come to a decision. Or they have very little time to play so they
selfishly make people wait long periods of time. But of course when they have the better game
there blue light is blazing!!!....odd
ionadowman
18-Jul-11, 16:49

Tactical_abyss...
While I don't know the full story of what the opponent did in the 12 move mate, I rather think I would have played it out myself - as a courtesy to my opponent! Of course, possibly he did spend the maximum time allowed to study it, which I probably would not have done.

There are times in which I will have had the appearance of stalling this or that game, but that's just the way the cookie crumbles, if I happen to have a game with a few hours left to play when I take a much-needed break from GK. I try to avoid these situations, but now and then....

But I never make a move during a vacation, even if I do log on from time to time. That is usually just to find out what moves have been played on other games, check out messages and/orlook at forums. In such cases I might be online for less than a minute or two. We all have our codes of conduct.

In the case of shlam16: the conditionals will take care of it. If the opponent is like me, he may play it out 'for the record', but he might just resign. If the game has only 3 moves to play and its a 3-day time control, then within a week you'll have your result.

Give or take a vacation...
tactical_abyss
18-Jul-11, 17:25

Ion,
If you reread my 12 move conditional sentence above and the sentence that follows,it states that "my opponent did not resign,but wanted to play the mate through for a learning experience"."well good!" "have patience Shalam!"Unquote.

So I am actually telling Shalam that is a "good" and fine thing that my opponent took as long as he wanted in those 12 moves and by analogy he should think the same way with patience and understanding!But prealerting the opponent of a mate in 12,a mate in 6 or what have you,is also a good thing.It may just possibly speed up the game,or slow it down...it depends upon the opponent.My experience has shown however,that they will slow down a bit in the beginning to check the mate string out,and then many,many times resign a move or two before actual mate.Its a psychological thing!Why?bBcause it looks better and makes them feel better on the GK past game record that they resigned early and lost and was not mated!So many opponents hate to be mated in corresp.Infact I think I had only one opponent actually let themselves get mated in all the games I have played here since I joined GK....and that was an unrated game!

So basically my overall message to Shalam was to have patience,plug in alot of conditional moves when possible ect ect.Yes,there are many reasons for a player slowing down and they are not all stalling reasons...some are legit but then some are actually intentional stalls.But whatever they are,it dosen't really matter,as long as the rules are being followed,and really how could the rules not be followed when you think about it?

TA
baronderkilt
18-Jul-11, 17:26

IMO, non-professional as it is; There could be ...
players who Cannot, within their own psychology, Resign a game ... if they subconciously equate loss of a Chess game with either: 'death' (and maybe it is a death of sorts for many of us, to tip that King) or a severe blow to the self-esteem, if they are building (in-part) Identity/Ego upon Chess success.

Personally I feel it is incorrect to place too much Identity into any type of Game. But that is me. If/when it is ones' main passion & perhaps enjoyable distraction as well, I can see some value in a heavier Ego stake.

I think it is probably an indirect path: 'I Win/Don't Lose Chess games, therefore I am "A Winner" (in general); "Intelligent" (perhaps toss in Hard Working, for some), therefore, I am a successful & worthwhile (or Superior) person". And "It makes me feel GOOD too, to:"

'Crush their Ego!' (Fischer) or "Kaaarrrrrrrrrussshhhh" them! (A Polgar sister, and I've probably spelled it wrong!? LOL)

'Win a Prize/Cash~!' (Me~! You !?)
'Reap the fruits of time and preparation'
'be a Winner'
'Beat him like GHOTI, my arch-rival~! ... my Boss!! ... that 10 year old, whew! ( close call? Been there, done That. Also made several happy, ego bolstered pre-teen/barely-teen s. But it is good to spread some Joy, especially to the young !   )

I read Krogius on the Psychology of Chess, but it deals largely with why mistakes are made on the board. So Where does this all come from ??! Is it "OK" to be basely opinionated ?! Am i cruising for an Ego hit ?  

Posted for your reading pleasure, in good humour & semi-sincerity . . .

Baron (I like to be called Baron, it is a positive-stroke based upon self perception of the imaginary possibility of an association with royalty, a demographic generally, tho probably falsely, associated with superiority. But hey, I'll take that 'imaginary-little-win' and run with it today! Gather Joy where we find it . . . }8-D LOL

PS// Remember; "Keep laughing, and the World will laugh with you, or at least wonder what you're up to" ... & "Kaaarrrrrrussshhh" someone today; politely, wearing a smile.
tactical_abyss
18-Jul-11, 17:52

There is an underlying logic behind not resigning a lost game in corresp play that I see happen from time to time.Many opponents do not fully realize the amount of mistakes and blunders that opponents make,even on the master and senior master levels.Now the 2 games listed below are NOT examples of my opponent playing on in a lost position,but an example of very early game blunders,almost unbelievable mistakes and actually EARLY resignations.So if these blunders can happen on my level,then some players may play on in a lost position in the "hopes"that a similar blunder like mine can occur,even in a lost position.

Now on the lower rating levels,it would be very possible for an opponent to have kept on playing where my master opponents blundered,but on the higher level,it is an unwritten understanding that it would basically be a hopeless situation to play on,so they resign.

Take a look!

game

game

17 moves in the first game and a major blunder and only 22 moves and a major blunder in the second game.All of these blunders by masters!So sometimes playing on in lost positions can reverse and your winning opponent just "might"blunder like my opponents,and lose anyway!
tactical_abyss
18-Jul-11, 18:04

In my comment above,I am of course,excluding definite losses(mate) with a conditional move string plugged in.They may be down 2 Rooks or a Queen and a Rook and still play on because they are not in a mating net and are hopeful that the opponent will blunder like my above games.In blitz blunders are as common as breathing.How many stalemates have i forced when my opponent had 3 Queens on the board and I had my lone king a Knight and perhaps a pawn or two?Sometimes.....never resign!ha ha!
brigadecommander
18-Jul-11, 18:10

still......
why do many players take so long in 'difficult' positions and then they can't wait for you to
move in positions where they are a little better(the blazing blue light).There is much hesitation.
stretching into many days. It takes me the same amount of time to make a offensive move as it
does a defensive one. Its almost as if they take the 'not so good position' and put it in a closet
for as long as possible. The argument that there busy is is proven false by there undivided
attention and (apparently) vast amounts of time) when they stand better. I have no problem
with playing the game out to the bitter end. I just would rather finnish the game in a few months
not YEARS.
tactical_abyss
18-Jul-11, 18:21

Who knows brigade?
Consider all of us lucky that chess is not like billiards,where the game must be played on to the end for the winner.....like 8 ball.In 8 ball you can have all your balls off the table and your opponent may not have sunk one ball,but does he quit?H.no!You still have to sink that 8 ball without scratching and usually without missing it(contacting it)with the cue ball or you lose.
By analogy,chess "could"and is similar in certain ways.but be lucky the rules of chess do not make all of us play on to mate,just like that 8 ball game!
brigadecommander
18-Jul-11, 18:29

i guess so...
i guess your right Joe, I wish GK had a way to play games with tournament time controls,say 40
moves in two hrs. Its so much more fun!!!...Janet
baronderkilt
18-Jul-11, 18:43

BG, There are those also ...
who just do not like to face unpleasant or stressful things. Such as a Chess game can become.

While I may be in this general category of procrastination, my own use of more time in bad Chess positions is more a factor of wanting to consider every possible resource. Think abaout the game in odd moments available. Even "sleep on it" since many good ideas have come at waking time.

Once in a dream, I was shouting NOT Qd3! repeatedly, telling me of danger from that move. The subconscious speaks if we listen; such as the move your "hand" hesitates to make, or "likes". Many times my "hand" has warned me of danger or blundering in a tournament or club game. Some times I have disbelieved and regretted that decision! Of Course this can only mean; I have played Way Too Much CHESS in My Life~!! lol

Another part of my own use of more time when pressed by the opponent is simply that I find it nearly impossible to make myself post a move that I know loses, or is insufficient, is Bad ... and will use all my time looking for better. On the bright side, regarding game length, it is quite possible that I would Resign at that point. Or soon after if my best reply left a bit of chance for a saving error by the opponent. I "RESIGN" rather EASILY, but may devote a lot of effort into not reaching such positions.

}8-)
tactical_abyss
19-Jul-11, 00:16

Janet,
I've already played a few 2 hour games on this site!All it takes is a courtesy agreement between 2 players to simply finish in 2 hours starting at an exact hour to the minute.It can and does work.But if one player goes over the 2 hour limit,they must also agree to resign the game,even if they are up a Queen and two Rooks and/or even if they are about to mate the other player in 1 move but they go over by 1 or two seconds!What you must do a few times during the game and near the endgame is simply ask your opponent exactly what time they have on their watch and at what time the "seconds"are at,just like the military does when they have synchronization of the watches with several soldiers.No,it will not be absolutely "perfect"timing like a chess clock...i'm sure there are delays with the net,ect,but it is close enough to play the game fairly accurately,plus it would rarely get down to 3 or 4 seconds of being that close to a flag drop in a corresp game.Try it sometime with someone,even unrated....what do you have to lose,no points right?

In my case,the last one I played was rated however and we both agreed to a draw.I did lose,I think 3 points since the player was less rated than me,but it was fun either way!
brigadecommander
19-Jul-11, 00:26

thats a good idea!!
I never thought of that!! i will try it soon. But can it be set up by GK to play such timed games
or is it unfeasible?(in tourneys only) such a arrangement would make Tournaments a lot more
fun.
tactical_abyss
19-Jul-11, 00:39

No,GK will never set those things up in a tourney or any other type of game between 2 players.There is simply no way the clocks can or will be set up accurately enough to play corresp wise....atleast not that I am aware of.Yes,its done in blitz on the blitz sites and here but those games are a few short minutes.Either way,even if it theoretically feasible,i'm pretty sure GK would never do that.But even though its not a precise clock science with net delays and other things,its close enough to do with a willing opponent if you can trust them.Again try it unrated and see how it goes as an experiment.I did it,so anyone else can as well.
brigadecommander
19-Jul-11, 01:01

ok
i understand. I will try it with some friends of mine on GK. Thanks Joe,you have been a great
help!! see ya one day in Washington Sq park!!...j
nathanman22
19-Jul-11, 20:11

Busy schedules are a logical reason
I work 2 full time jobs and run a successful ebay business. I have a girlfriend who will soon be my fiance. For this reason, i have been ring shopping recently which takes any free time I have left. This summer I also volunteered at Bible Memory Camps and have made 2 trips to visit my girlfriend down south. I also have had to supervise and babysit my little sister due to medical conditions. So don't for a second tell me that the argument of busyness has been proven false! Its a very logical reason for slow moving games! Furthermore, it logically follows that when you are in a losing position, you take more time to study every possible move trying to make the best one. When you are ahead...its easier...and you may get careless by moving too fast. I honestly move most of my games slow because I don't have much time. However, the end factor is always this...we have an allotted amount of time to move and it's perfectly legal to use the full time if you need it.
nathanman22
19-Jul-11, 20:18

Ungentlemanlike
It's just as ungentleman-like to rush a player who can't move due to scheduling as it is to take longer to move. I let people know why I'm taking extra time as much as possible. You know how annoying it is to read over and over again the gripes that someone won't move and the automatic accusation that he must be stalling! Now thats ungentlemanlike! I defend all those who take their time, who may need vacation, and who may wish to focus on a few games to improve results. The time frames are there to be used if needed.
brigadecommander
19-Jul-11, 20:29

well bully for you!!!!
i too am very very busy.4-Math courses,Two biology and about a dozen other scientific courses.
As well as wildlife photography. And Astrophotography at night But it STILL takes me only about
1-hour to make a move (bad position or not). Yes you have the right to take the full amount of
time.That's why i now check my opponents 'time per move'. If its to slow i don't play them,or
allow a challenge. I guess you and i will not be playing anytime soon!!
nathanman22
19-Jul-11, 21:21

Intention was not to brag about how busy I was.
Ok, I wasn't trying to brag. I'm sorry if it sounded that way. I just get tired of the constant griping from all these people who don't respect out decision to take our time. I respect your decision to move quickly and if you want to do that, this is fine. However, when I chose to take my time to move or have to take my time due to outside circumstances, it's the subject of tons of forum threads where people are "stalling"...when that's usually not the case all. All I ask is that you respect me like I respect you. It's all about respect. When you enter into a game or into a tournament, you take a risk that a player may move a little slower than you like. If you don't like it, don't sign up for the tournaments. The biggest problem I have is that you can easily start other games and play those. Why is it so important that 1 opponent you are playing takes longer to move? Honestly, you may be playing 50 games, 49 are moving quickly and one is slow. So you take time to come on the forums and complain about that one person rather than waiting that game out and playing the other 49? That's classless, my friend. Show some class.

-Nathan
Pages: 12
Go to the last post