Chess related: sacrificing bishop to take knight early in game.
« Back to forum
FromMessage
scrname
27-Feb-12, 20:03

sacrificing bishop to take knight early in game.
Have a question about a move that I see a lot that does not really make sence to me. When I am playing as
white and I move Nf3 and black moves Bg4 pinning my knight to my queen, assuming the kings pawn was
moved to e4. They then will take my knight with the bishop with Bxf3. This seems like a waste because I don't
see anything being gained because I will just take there bishop with Qxf3. Am I right or is there an advantage to
sacrificing blacks bishop?
blake78613
28-Feb-12, 05:12

It is not a sacrifice it is an exchange. It would depend on the position to see if anything was gained.
rockall
28-Feb-12, 08:05

@scrname
Some beginners exchange bishops for knights automatically and as soon as possible because they fear the
"tricky" moves of knights. They would be much better off to study the knight and become comfortable with it,
because as Blake points out, and as you seem to understand already, the wisdom of this exchange depends on
the position.

Making an early exchange of bishop for knight is sometimes disadvantageous because having a pair of bishops
is often better than having a bishop and a knight; especially in an open position where well positioned bishops
can work together. You may want to take a look at this analysis by Grandmaster Larry Kaufman -
home.comcast.net

One minor tip to help beginners become more comfortable with knights:
Notice that a knight on a white square always moves to a black square,
and a knight on a black square always moves to a white square. I know it is simple, and obvious as soon as
you think about it, but it seems to be a useful piece of information to explicitly recognize.

sixofspades
28-Feb-12, 10:57

my two cents worth
There are some circumstances that may make B-g5 a good move.

- when your opponent has already castled and chasing your bishop away with h6 and g5 would create a weaknesses in the pawn structure protecting the king.
- when you plan to meet h6 by retreating the bishop on the c1-g5 diagonal, the pawn on h6 becomes a potential target later.
- when you have a rook on h1, enabling h6 to be met by h4, if you sacrificed the piece. it would leave the king vulnerable to a mating attack down the newly opened h-file.

info from BETTER CHESS by William Hartston (a cheap but good book on chess)

Concerning the knight, one good rule of thumb is to leave potential pieces that could be forked by the knight, on different coloured squares. Knight forks are then impossible.

hope this helps
blake78613
28-Feb-12, 12:04

Moving the Black bishop to g5 puts pressure on e4 and is done in the main line closed Spanish.
baronderkilt
11-Mar-12, 07:37

I found a good practice exercise ...
for seeing knight moves, and avoiding forks, is to play the weak side of the endgame having
K+R vs K+R+N . You really learn something after 8 hours of this~!

(preferably not in the next to last round of a tournament again, with no adjournment possible   )