|
|
1. d4
|
This is a fun game, where we both queen a pawn, and end up with 4 queens on the board. It is also a bit of a mystery. I lose, but the post-game computer analysis (PMCA) doesn't highlight any mistakes by me. So where did a go wrong? Read through with me dear reader, and see if you can help me find out where I went wrong! |
3 comments
|
|
|
1... Nf6
|
So it starts conventionally. |

|
|
|
2. c4
|
I continue with the most popular move. |
1 comment
|
|
|
2... e6
|
This is very sound, indicating perhaps a Nimzo-Indian Defence or a Queen's Indian Defence. |

|
|
|
3. Nc3
|
I elect for a Nimzo-Indian. |
1 comment
|
|
|
3... Bb4
|
Which she obliges with, rather than transpose back to the Queens Gambit declined with d7-d5. |

|
|
|
4. e3
|
This is the main line. |
2 comments
|
|
|
4... b6
|
This is the more modern move, previously 0-0 was usually played here. |
2 comments
|
|
|
5. Nge2
|
So one knight supports the other. I stop her doubling my pawns. This is the Fischer variation, named after the only American World Chess Champion. |
2 comments
|
|
|
5... c5
|
She hits my centre. |
3 comments
|
|
|
6. a3
|
This is the obvious follow up to Nge2, now that she can't double my pawns. |

|
|
|
6... Ba5
|
So the Bishop retreats. |
2 comments
|
|
|
7. g3
|
As my bishop can't go to e2 or d3, I plan to develop it on g2. |
3 comments
|
|
|
7... Bb7
|
But this stops my plan! |
2 comments
|
|
|
8. d5
|
This is virtually the only move. If she now takes on d5 I don't take back immediately, as she can just take on d5 as my Nc3 is not really protecting d5 as it is pinned against my king. Instead I would have played Bg2 first, before taking back on d5. |

|
|
|
8... b5
|
So she doesn't take, but further undermines my centre. |
2 comments
|
|
|
9. Bg2
|
I need to develop and protect d5. |
2 comments
|
|
|
9... bxc4
|
And now my talented young opponent is a pawn up, but it is debatable whether or not she can hang on to it. |
3 comments
|
|
|
10. O-O
|
So I just castle. |

|
|
|
10... O-O
|
And so does she. |

|
|
|