|
1. e4
|
A fairly short game that quickly became a violent series of sacs. |

|
|
|
1... c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. f4
|
Sicilian Grandprix. |

|
|
|
3... g6 4. Nf3 Bg7 5. Bb5
|
I prefer this to 5.Bc4, because ...e6 severely limits my bishop's effectiveness. Trading the bishop for his knight is usually not detrimental to white's position. |

|
|
|
5... Nd4
|
Black's main try. |

|
|
|
6. O-O Nxb5
|
Simplifying the position. In most opening positions I prefer my bishops to my knights and so try to avoid exchanging them, but in this particular opening it's not only acceptable, it's preferable to exchange it. |

|
|
|
7. Nxb5 d6 8. d3 Nf6 9. Qe1
|
Preparing to aggressively attack the kingside. White's potential, whether his kingside attack succeeds or not, is more than enough to make up for the exchanged bishop. |

|
|
|
9... O-O 10. Qh4 Bd7 11. Nc3 b5
|
His counterattack looks dangerous, and will come faster than mine, but while his will net a long term advantage, he needs to survive to use it! |

|
|
|
12. f5
|
The beginning of a series of sacs (mostly little pawn ones). It also opens the bishop's c1-h6 diagonal, which is essential to the attack. |

|
|
|
12... b4 13. Ne2 gxf5
|
Perhaps not best. His position is tenuous, and how much can he gain from this? A few pawns? |

|
|
|
14. Bh6 fxe4 15. Ng5
|
Intensifying the pressure. |

|
|
|
15... exd3
|
A mistake, perhaps even a blunder! Here I should ignore the threat to knight and simply play Bxg7 and continue my planned attack. I was feeling a bit more cautious, though, so... |

|
|
|
16. Ng3 dxc2
|
A truly fatal blunder. His best chance is to play Bh8, when I still come out with a limited advantage. Here, though, when allowed to exchange the bishops, my attack becomes lethal. |
1 comment
|
|
|
17. Bxg7 Kxg7 18. Rxf6
|
The point of the entire combination. My opponent resigned here, in light of his three options: A) 18...exf6 19.Qxh7#, B) 18...Kxf6 19.Rf1+ Ke5 20.Qe4#, and C) 18...Kxf6 19.Rf1+ Kg6 20.Qxh7+ Kxg5 21.Qh5#. |
2 comments
|
|