Annotated chess game: This guy should NOT be 1927.

ANNOTATED GAME

This guy should NOT be 1927.
leolen11 vs. oops_you_lose
Annotated by: oops_you_lose (1200)
Chess opening: Scotch (C45), Schmidt variation

Interactive

•

Show all comments

•

All annotated games

•

View chessboard as:


1. e4	White begins with 1. e4, the only viable first move for White.
	6 comments theancientbeast (1382) on 14-Apr-12: Not by ANY stretch of the imagination is this the only viable move for White! There is a plethora of other first moves! the_hitch_hiker (1200) on 15-Apr-12: You're an idiot. blitzkov (1200) on 15-Apr-12: the hitch_hiker is right! binblaster (1200) on 16-Apr-12: In this case I agree with the_hitch_hiker. dmaestro (1512) on 16-Apr-12: Another ignorant "annotation". It turns out this was a blitz game and thus meaningless, not a serious game. Oops you lose has misrepresented this game. 31415 (1200) on 31-May-12: Very STUPID anotation, ha ha ha ! how do you feel ? Intelligent ?


1... e5	Black responds symmetrically.



2. Nf3	White is playing well so far, too bad his noobness soon begins to shine.



2... Nc6	Standard response by Black.



3. d4 exd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Nxc6	The first move that's a little strange for White. Why spend two moves developing the knight, only to give it away? As bad as this move was, this guy plays far worse later on.
	3 comments blake78613 (1200) on 14-Apr-12: So far this is the main line of the Scotch Four Knights. White is more or less forced to play Nxc6 in order to defend his e4 pawn with Bd3. dmaestro (1512) on 14-Apr-12: Nothing wrong so far. liam1260 (1830) on 16-Apr-12: White has forked Queen and Bishop. The capture can be considered after 5..Bc5 6.Be3 also.


6... bxc6 7. Bd3 d5 8. e5	Weak move, exposing White's kingside - with disastrous results.
	3 comments blake78613 (1200) on 14-Apr-12: 8.Nothing wrong with 8.e5 and certainly not weak. schakertje (1200) on 15-Apr-12: e5 is weak because it weakens the e-pawn. Its hard to defend that pawn, if black keeps up the pressure on the pawn, unless white wants to destroy his kingside with f4 or something like that. dmaestro (1512) on 15-Apr-12: Here e5 is ok if white rapidly plays h3.


8... Bxc3+ 9. bxc3 Ng4 10. O-O O-O 11. f4 Qe7	Threatening Qc5.



12. h3	White doesn't see the threat. Very surprising for a supposed 1927 player.
	2 comments dmaestro (1512) on 15-Apr-12: It happens. blitzkov (1200) on 15-Apr-12: yeah!


12... Qc5+ 13. Kh1 Nf2+	Bye bye, rook!



14. Rxf2 Qxf2 15. Qh5	Does this guy really think he's gonna get a mate on someone who's outplayed him so far?



15... g6 16. Qd1	Aww, poor queen! Anyway, White resigned at this point. Why carry on the massacre, right? Hopefully this kid went to go improve his game. Or maybe he just needed to get his chess program out to help him - after all, we know he didn't get 1927 through his own skill.
	9 comments schakertje (1200) on 14-Apr-12: White played really bad in this game. But it's possible to make mistakes, why do you think he is not rated this high with his own skill? You decide it with only 1 game? Both players obviously play with the chess game database. If I would play against you, oops_you_lose, I will play a4 as the opening. Just to kill the chess game database stuff. theancientbeast (1382) on 14-Apr-12: I concur with this comment. One game does not make the player. ANYONE can have a crappy game. :/ blake78613 (1200) on 14-Apr-12: It is certainly outrageous to accuse him of cheating without any evidence. The only weak move I see is the blunder on move 12 when he over looked ...Qc5+. That could happen to anyone. dmaestro (1512) on 16-Apr-12: Looking at leolen11 short game history I find NO recoed of this game on GK. And oops us lose is a terrible annotator and one who makes outrageous charges of cheating without any evidence, leolen11 (1200) on 16-Apr-12: haha! "Bye bye, rook!" - you are comedian))) for all other: it was blitz chess. I do not take it seriously and I did not think to long moves. I amused. oops_you_lose, Why do you think of this so seriously??? It's all fake, This is not real life!!! It is virtually... oops_you_lose, you need to grow up! binblaster (1200) on 16-Apr-12: Anything can happen in blitz. Anyone can play badly with short time controls. This annotator makes many unfounded claims about how well respected openings are bad (try looking at these annotated games by him: gameknot.com gameknot.com) and now has taken to accusing people of cheating over a blitz game. His annotations can only be described as a waste of time. blitzkov (1200) on 16-Apr-12: he is new! he could be rated 1200 or 2200 USCF or something, DID YOU MAKE THIS GAME UP YOUR SELF?? rookie879 (1200) on 17-Apr-12: Guys, how many times do we have to feed the trolls... reubencpiplupyay (1600) on 05-May-15: Anything happens in blitz. I've given away a queen, rook, knight and 5 pawns in blitz. Compared to me, this guy played OK!