|
|
22... Bxg4 23. Qxg4 Qf6
|
attacking White's backward pawn. |
1 comment
|
|
|
24. Rad1 a5 25. b5 Rg6
|
GN has the advantage at -0.49 (for Black) while Fritz has the game equal. |

|
|
|
26. Qe2 Qxf4
|
White wins a pawn. |
2 comments
|
|
|
27. f3 cxb5 28. axb5
|
27...cxb5 28. axb5 Black now has a passed pawn to contend with. |
1 comment
|
|
|
28... a4
|
28...a4 The saying "passed pawns must be pushed" comes to mind. However, according to GN, Black went from -0.68 to -0.10 with that move. I'm not quite sure why--should Black perhaps have moved 28...exf3 I'm not sure. I do know that the next few moves wins a pawn back for White. |
3 comments
|
|
|
29. fxe4 Qxe4+
|
expected. |

|
|
|
30. Qxe4 dxe4 31. Rf4
|
There's really no way to save e4 at this point. |

|
|
|
31... Rg5 32. Rxe4 Kf7
|
We've moved into a double rook endgame. GN now gives White the slight advantage +0.14 |

|
|
|
33. h4 Rd5
|
I mulled this move over for quite awhile |

|
|
|
34. b6
|
34. b6 All of these moves took a fair amount of time for me. I did not want Black to move b6 as my analysis showed that would lose a pawn for White. |
1 comment
|
|
|
34... e5 35. Rxe5 Rxe5 36. dxe5 a3
|
It was right about here that my opponent complimented my play thus far in the game. It always nice when someone 300+ points better than you tells you that you are playing a good game. She also told me that I had a draw on my hands if I played correctly. I've never drawn against a 2000+ opponent, so, of course, I felt the pressure. I deliberated several days over the next sequence of moves. I don't know if I would have worked so hard at it if my opponent had not told me that a draw was possible. At any rate, I worked out the correct moves but move 41 will undo it all. |

|
|
|
37. c6 bxc6 38. Rd7+ Ke6 39. Ra7
|
I hoped Black might exchange Rs but she's too strong a player to do so. |

|
|
|
39... Rb8 40. Rxa3 Rxb6
|
Again, my opponent complimented me. GN has the score of the game as -0.01 and fritz has it equal. While I don't know how equal the game is at this point while we're playing it, I know that it's going well. I guess I need to protect e5 [cue ominous music] |

|
|
|
41. Re3
|
And this essentially loses the game for me. Not my typical blunder where I give away a piece--just inexact play against a superior opponent and bad things happen. My opponent let me know that Ra7! was the move I should have made.
GN offered 41. Ra7 g6 42. Rxh7 Kxe5 43. Re7+ Kd5 44. Rd7+ Ke4 45. Re7+ Kd5
Fritz offered "41. Ra7!? should be examined more closely" [sarcasm]You think so, fritz?[end sarcasm]
I focused so much on keeping material even that I missed the threat caused by Ra7. Ra7...Ra7...Ra7 Is see Ra7 in my nightmares. |
2 comments
|
|
|
41... c5
|
GN now scores the game -1.05 and this number will now just increase. |

|
|
|
42. Kf3 c4 43. Re2 Kd5 44. Rd2+
|
This got a ? mark from fritz and GN didn't like it too much either. I had a plan to attack, belatedly, g7 and h7, but it didn't work. |
1 comment
|
|
|
44... Kxe5 45. Rd7 Rf6+ 46. Ke3 Rg6 47. Kf3 c3
|
passed pawns must be pushed. |

|
|
|
48. Rc7 Kd4 49. Rd7+ Kc5 50. Ke2 Rxg3
|
I figured I had to get to c3 and then worry about the other pawns. |

|
|
|
51. Kd1 Rg4 52. Kc2 Rxh4 53. Rxg7
|
I didn't want to allow connected passed pawns so I thought I'd just take out g7 first |

|
|
|
53... Rh3
|
For those keeping score at home, GN has it at -3.02 |

|
|
|