Annotated chess game

Nothing aggressive about it. Better to have preserved the bishop and made your opponent defend the weakened King position.

YOu could have activated it at 21 with what seems like a material win or tying up the pieces

yes, it looks like you may have a way to attack if you get another piece onto the kingside, as 3 pieces attacking a king will usually succeed if you have an advantage on that side already eg: 1.opponent's pawns don't adequately cover their king 2.You have more pieces there 3.your opponent has a shortage of pieces there.

that's funny. white should ask himself: What is there to attack on the Qside: a few pawns, while his king is under pressure

White can probably hold this game by defensive play, there is nothing to be gained by a Q side attack.

you seem to have good compensation, with active pieces.

It wasn't necessary to sac the pawn.

you should add some pawns into the attack if you cannot win with pieces alone.

This is a blunder. Why open lines for Black?

I think so too, 4 stars.