|
|
|
11. Ne4
|
This is another excellent move, better than the obvious Nxc4, when e5 or retreating my bishop leaves me an extra pawn up. |
 
|
| |
|
|
11... Qe7
|
I had to retreat to e7 or d8. I considered this move better, as if I play d8, in some variations the queens get exchanged on the d file and my under-development is exposed. |
|
| |
|
|
12. Nxd4
|
and now he is threatening to exchange on c6 and then take on d6, so I move my bishop to the most active square |
|
| |
|
|
12... Be5 13. Nxc6
|
White exchanges and weakens my pawn formation |
|
| |
|
|
13... bxc6
|
after dropping the pawn, white has fought back well, and even has an edge now |
|
| |
|
|
14. Nf6+
|
I was expecting this! |
|
| |
|
|
14... Kf8
|
I could have taken the knight. After Bxf6 15. Bxc6+ Bd7 16. Bxa8 O-O bishop moves and then I take on b2. With pawn and bishop for rook, black is doing ok, but I thought the game continuation was ok. I probably was, and my mistake was later on.
|
|
| |
|
|
15. Bxc6
|
Hitting the rook |
1 comment
|
| |
|
|
15... Rb8
|
Now he has to move his knight |
2 comments
|
| |
|
|
16. Ng4 Bxb2 17. Rb1 e5
|
hitting his knight |
|
| |
|
|
18. Ne3 Bh3
|
hitting the rook |
|
| |
|
|
19. Re1 Qc7
|
The idea is to protect the rook, so I can move my bishop. I hoped to win the exchange with Bc3. Of course my opponent saw this threat too. |
|
| |
|
|
20. Qd5 Be6
|
So I bring my bishop back to defend c4 |
|
| |
|
|
21. Qc5+ Qe7
|
Now if he exchanges I can at last develop my R(h8) |
|
| |
|
|
22. Qa5
|
So he doesn't go in for that. |
|
| |
|
|
22... g6
|
There is a certain logic to this move, I wanted to play Kg7 and develop R(h8). Unfortunately it leaves on a tactical blow. |
|
| |
|
|
23. Rxb2 Rxb2 24. Qxe5 Qa3 25. Qxh8+ Ke7 26. Rd1
|
With a horrible mating threat. Thanks for reading this, please rate my annotation and leave some comments! |
3 comments
|
| |
|
(2224)