Annotated chess game

A very good move. Ignoring the pawn and going for line opening.

It would be interesting to see how went wrong 11.e4, it looks interesting. Anyway, I agree black is in a very delicate situation.

Strictly speaking, if it's the only move possible, then it doesn't deserve a ??

Yes but I gave it a ?? because strictly speaking he shouldn't of got into that position and strictly speaking their was one over option resign!

People are perfectly entitled to carry on to mate.

Don't take too seriously !! or ??... Strictly speaking, we all should avoid using these comments. And, strictly speaking, black could have played Kd7, too.

Funny comment!   Oh, I win a pawn... and, by the way, I give checkmate to my opponent.   Just joking.

Don't tell me  

QxN is good, too.

1. The game itself was well played. 2. You need to learn to respect your opponent, even if he is really bad. Imagine playing somebody stronger than yourself and getting really humiliated on and off the board. You will most likely never be a good player if you don't change your attitude.

Well, Tom, your silly comments only prove your childish arrogance ...and i can't agree more with marinvukusic, whose words were so 'prophetising'. Your beloved opening didn't work with me and being the ass that you are, you're deliberately stalling our game for the third month now. Pawn-grabbing is far from pesky, it's the megalomaniac behind the board who is pesky 100% of the time. Therefore the real question here is: "Do Pesky Megalomaniacs Prosper?" - and I'm sure you're all over this one...  

Well pulsas is that a challenge? Bring it on! By the way these comments are not malicious and were writtten in jest. I hae sopeken to the player who I played this game with, who by the way is a good friend of mine and he had a good laugh about how everybody was reacting to it!  

Really well played, but everyone has to start somewhere, and I would be quite hurt if i were that guy. also i notice you have responded to the other comments, but not these ones. lol Edit: fair enough, but i thought u said u forgot who the game was played against!! Edit: Just searched for that guys profile, & he doesn't exist!!

Change your attitude.I challenge you to a game in this opening which will bring you to the right path.

Young and enthusiastic. He will learn, with time, how hard are things in chess - and everywhere. I've seen much worse outing in blitz games. Another thing: The stars are supposed to be given to the ANNOTATION, not to the GAME. A good annotation is whatever you think it is, but for me: 1) Gives "reasons behind moves". 2) Gives variants and alternative moves and their probable path. 3) Alternatively, gives a nice or funny or psychological or whatever comment about the game . 4) Doesn't comment "obvious" things (this can be forgiven only because GK annotation systems needs a comment to be done on a move in order to allow the rest of the people to add theirs). You have to consider, too, the skill of the player who did it. From a 1200 player I cannot expect the knowledge and deepness of a 2000's one. The annotation is not too bad for a 1200 player. As for the "attitude", I can see some of what was said. I won't give it a star value.