Play online chess!

rebuttal to;Obama: Government, Not Business, Deserves the Credit
« Back to club forum
Pages: 123
Go to the last post
FromMessage
brigadecommander
20-Jul-12, 17:37

altered and edited videos
would not under the Constitution would be admissible in a court of law nor in any scholarly debate. They are other people's opinions not facts. If The President proposes Legislation to be passed and it gets passed then you beef is with the Representatives in Congress's Legislating a law you disagree with.You have the power to vote your congressman out of office if the majority of your state constituents agree with you. The President cannot force his views on Congress. By God this is 4th grade stuff!!!! Show me in the Official Congressional records where the president has passed a bill without there consent!!! there are none!!!!!! Altered opinion videos are not Congressional records!! or proof of anything except a lack of understanding of how our Democracy works. Are you telling me that Glen Beck and his ilk are telling the truth when the Congressional records show otherwise?? Do you expect a rational person to believe this? you have been duped young man.badly mislead. The Truth is you dislike the President as many people do. Your best hope would be in you power to vote,as is mine. Repeating Tall tales and False lies is also your right under the constitution,but will get you no-where because the Majority of the people set the agenda not fringe groups.Sorry that's just the way it is.
deadofknight
20-Jul-12, 17:53

BC
The tenor of my comments, you will note, was more historical. I tend to like that pretext having had a rather vast life experience there, so if you don't like that perspective, I am sorry. I did not intend to inflame you, only to express my feelings from a historical context having been engaged in many broad American experiences.

As for the points you raised. First, please read the speech. Democrats today, including, Mr. Obama, are trying to rewrite this speech, however, it is easy to see what he meant when you read what he said when he said it. I will re-read it if you will. I am not sure if you did or if you were just terribly upset that I disagreed with what he said.

Second, you mentioned me being a dumbed-down fox regurgitant. I promise you I am not. I really do.

Third, I like the idea that we all stand or fall together. I have some dear friends that have tried to start businesses in the last five years and been chewed up...is it alright if I send you a portion of those bills they are now paying off--as your part of the "falling together" concept? They are also losing their homes. 20+ years of equity lost. Would you mind compensating them for that as well? No? Standing together and falling together is a nice idea when it comes to the mutual defense of our country. Fighting fires. Protecting ourselves from crime. Not joining our businesses into one balance sheet. There is a name for that; Communism. (communally or socially owned property) Doesn't sound so sexy now does it?

Fourth, and I will leave it here for now as I am a friendly chap. Mr. Obama has demonstrated a unilateral defiance of Congress thru Presidential fiat over the last year in ways that have grown that particular branch of the government in demonstrably amazing ways that are pressing the legal and constitutional limits of his power.

I am surprised you have not noticed and have oddly thrown your argument onto Congress as he has been thumbing his nose at them and with the stroke of a pen, going around them.

I write this happily, no ill feelings and a wish that you would respect my feelings as I do yours.

DoK
shamash
20-Jul-12, 18:09

bs's civics 101
objectively looking at bc's comments --

the descriptive ones,

the prescriptive ones,

the evaluative ones --

when you peel away the emotions (which are justified)

and simply focus on the content:

========> they make sense to me,

a whole lot of sense,

each and every one.
brigadecommander
20-Jul-12, 18:18

thumper.
v You mention Executive orders,Bully pulpit and appointments as examples of exaggerated Presidential powers.Lets take them one at a time OK? 1) Executive orders.The only one i know about of importance is is the executive order to have Asama bin laden killed. But here in the interest of transparency here are 'all' the rest; From the national Ark hives;www.archives.gov

2) Appointments; Many of The presidents appointments have been blocked by the Congress but here they are;en.wikipedia.org
3) bully pulpit; Yes the President has the bully-pulpit. If he can convince people of something(remember the president proposes) then they in turn can convince the congress. So if the congress doesn't go along with his proposals the idea's go no where. If i remember correctly George w Bush succeeded by use the bully pulpit in convincing the American public and the majority in Congress that a 'Great mushroom cloud was about to hit the USA!!!.of COURSE THERE WAS NO MUSHROOM CLOUD nor any clouds whatsoever and he knew it!!!.Wonderful use of the bully-pulpit yes!!! hundreds of thousands of Iraqi's dead, thousands of American service men and women dead or maimed billions in national treasure wasted, and best of all the escape of the perpetrator of the 911 attacks!! Bravo Mr Bush bravo!!..So i look and looked and still i cannot find where Our President is doing all these terrible things you guys are talking about.I can't find any 'weapons of mass destruction' or any proof for that matter how the president is circumventing the congress and forcing us down this dark road ya all are so worried about.And all this just makes my point that ya don't like him so ya make stuff up. By the way.The sites i reference are official Govt sites not like what you guys use as proof..doctored opinion videos!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bencox1
20-Jul-12, 19:26

Executive Orders
brigadecommander Here are just a handful of over 900 executive orders issued by Obama.

* Executive Order 10990 allows the Government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
* Executive Order 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
* Executive Order 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels, and minerals.


* Executive Order 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
* Executive Order 11001 allows the government to take over all health education and welfare functions.
* Executive Order 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
* Executive Order 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
* Executive Order 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate and establish new locations for populations.
brigadecommander
20-Jul-12, 19:48

What planet are you on.
These are not executive orders!! they are the ravings of a lunatic.Where do you get you info from. A tissue sample from glen Becks BRAIN? i get mine from the ;national ark\Chives' But i suppose you would say THERE UNTRUE!! UNBELIEVABLE!!! seriously WHERE DID YOU DIG THIS UP? you really need to get a life. To all members of this club. Look up this link'www.archives.gov and compare it what has been put down as 'sinister executive orders'. I thought i had heard it all but this takes the cake!!!!!
bencox1
20-Jul-12, 19:51

Drone Strikes
I agree that Bush was wrong in using scare tactics but what does blaming the guilt on someone else do. Bush started "the war on terror" and Obama is just continuing it. What is "the war on terror", what is terror, can it be defined? Bush laid the foundations for martial law and Obama is continuing it. Look at the drone strikes Obama has used in "the war on terror", they have killed many civilians. en.wikipedia.org
If you cannot see where Obama is taking us open your eyes before martial law is declared and all of our liberties are poured down the drain and the constitution thrown aside.
www.nowpublic.com
bencox1
20-Jul-12, 20:14

I'm done with reasoning
brigadecommander I thought that this was a debate not who can scream the loudest. Look at the information I have presented and stop using different fallacies in reasoning commfaculty.fullerton.edu While I have tried to reason with you, you come and generalize me as a disciple of Glen Beck...?
I might be willing to debate when you are ready to debate with me and not try to drown me out with opinionated straw man arguments.
brigadecommander
20-Jul-12, 20:24

good!! go away
i have no Patience for paranoid delusional people. Your best bet would be to get some army fatigues and crawl into a fox hole to await the great Govt takeover by the Negro,/Muslim/Communist/socialist/ President.Good luck to you.
softaire
20-Jul-12, 20:28

I don't know all about all this, but...

Didn't BO issue an executive order to IGNORE federal law about deporting illegal aliens?
Didn't BO issue an executive order to IGNORE DADT laws?
Didn't BO issue an executive order to ignore the DOM act?

Since he directs federal agencies, doesn't all the new restrictive, federal regulations issued by the EPA and DOE reflect where BO is bringing/directing this country?

My impression, about the OBAMACARE law, is that it was passed without any discussion, on a Friday night before Christmas without any legislator reading it, and it got the votes it needed because the Democrats threatened to pass it by "deeming it passed" or by using "Reconciliation" to get it passed, but ultimately by buying the votes necessary by bribing key legislators with the "Cornhusker Kickback" and the "Louisiana Purchase".

I think it instructive to point out that in the nearly four years of BO, we have had three consecutive years of $1.3 TRILLION DEFICITS to the budget which has resulted in an astounding $15 TRILLION DEBT and a credit downgrade to the United States of America.

And, coincidentally, we have had three years where the Democratically controlled Senate has not allowed any discussion (let alone a vote) on budgets. They have FAILED to produce one budget in three years... they should be impeached just for that. THAT is their job. It is law that they produce a budget for the President to sign or veto.

shamash
20-Jul-12, 20:46

find that foxhole. . .
regarding the post:

<<"Your best bet would be to get some army fatigues and crawl into a fox hole
to await the great Govt takeover by the Negro,/Muslim/Communist/socialist/ President.">>

ya gotta luv it  
thumper
20-Jul-12, 20:47

Breadcrumbs
Brigadecommander loudly proclaims:
"What planet are you on. These are not executive orders!! they are the ravings of a lunatic.Where do you get you info from. A tissue sample from glen Becks BRAIN?"

Lets take a look shall we. If you will note, these are taken directly from the link BC provided. The same link she claims no such orders exist. For the sake of brevity I just pull up EO11000 as an example to show the breadcrumb trail that was fashioned. The trail runs from EO11000 to EO11490 to EO12656 to Codification at Chapter 44. Also note the amendments along the way. A convoluted trail being created, designed to confuse/confound the casual observer.

www.archives.gov

Executive Orders(11000-11249)
Number or Date Amendments Disposition
11000 Revoked by EO 11490
11001 Revoked by EO 11490
11002 Revoked by EO 11490
11003 Revoked by EO 11490
11004 Revoked by EO 11490
11005 Revoked by EO 11490
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11490 Amended by EO's
11522, 11556, 11746, 11921, 11953, 12038, 12046, 12107, 12148, 12608 Revoked by EO 12656
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12656 Codified at Chapter 44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Codification of Presidential Proclamations and Executive Orders Chapter 44
Emergency Management and Assistance

Executive Orders

10222
Providing for certain transfers to the Federal Civil Defense Administration
11179
Providing for the National Defense Executive Reserve
11795
Delegating disaster relief functions pursuant to the Disaster Relief Act of 1974
12127
Federal Emergency Management Agency
12148
Federal emergency management
12241
National Contingency Plan
12656
Assignment of emergency preparedness responsibilities
12657
Federal Emergency Management Agency assistance in emergency preparedness planning at commercial nuclear power plants
12658
President's Commission on Catastrophic Nuclear Accidents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Executive Order 11179--Providing for the National Defense Executive Reserve

Source: The provisions of Executive Order 11179 of Sept. 22, 1964, appear at 29 FR 13239, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 246, unless otherwise noted.

Cross reference: Executive Order 11725 of June 27, 1973, 38 FR 17175, 3 CFR, 1970-1975 Comp., p. 779, which was revoked by Executive Order 12148of July 20, 1979, Chapter 44, transferred certain functions under Executive Order 11179 to the Administrator of General Services.

By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and statutes of the United States, including Sections 703(a) and 710(e) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2153(a); 2160(e)), and as President of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. There shall be in the Executive Branch of the Government a National Defense Executive Reserve composed of persons selected from various segments of the civilian economy and from government for training for employment in executive positions in the Federal Government in the event of the occurrence of an emergency that requires such employment.

Sec. 2. The Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (hereinafter referred to as the Director) shall administer the Executive Reserve program; coordinate the activities of other agencies in establishing units of the Reserve; provide for appropriate standards of recruitment and training; approve prospective members of the Executive Reserve; and issue necessary rules and regulations in connection with the program.

[Sec. 2 amended by Executive Order 12148 of July 20, 1979, 44 FR 43239, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 412]

Sec. 3. The Director, in carrying out his responsibilities under this order, may utilize the services of other departments and agencies in the maintenance of agency and centralized rosters and in the development of training programs and materials.

Sec. 4. (a) The head of any department or agency of the Government (hereinafter referred to as a Secretary), designated by the Director after appropriate consultation, may establish a unit of the Executive Reserve (hereinafter referred to as Executive Reserve Units) in his respective department or agency.
(b) Executive Reserve Units existing under Executive Order No. 10660 of February 15, 1956, as amended, on the date of this order shall henceforth be deemed to be Executive Reserve Units under this order.

Sec. 5. Membership in Executive Reserve Units shall be subject to the following:
(1) Subject to the provisions of this order, particularly paragraph (4) of this section, an individual who on the date of this order was a member of an Executive Reserve Unit under Executive Order No. 10660 may continue to serve therein without further designation.
(2) A Secretary desiring to designate an individual to serve as a member of an Executive Reserve Unit of his department or agency shall submit the name of the prospective designee to the Director for approval. Upon approval of the prospective designee by the Director, the Secretary concerned may designate the individual as a member of the Executive Reserve Unit of his department or agency.
(3) An individual whose membership in an Executive Reserve Unit has at any time expired, or is at any time about to expire, under the terms of this order may be redesignated as a member under the procedure set forth in paragraph (2) of this section.
(4) Without limiting the authority of the respective Secretaries to terminate the membership of any individual in an Executive Reserve Unit at any time, it is directed that continued service of a member under paragraph (1) of this section, and the designation or redesignation of a member under paragraph (2) or (3) of this section, respectively (including any designation of an individual occurring at the expiration of his continued service under paragraph (1)), shall be for a period not to exceed three years.

Sec. 6. Activities of any person by reason of his continuance, designation, or redesignation as an Executive Reservist under this order shall not include acting or advising on any matter pending before any department or agency but shall be limited to receiving training for mobilization assignments under the Reserve program.

Sec. 7. The Director shall report to the President annually, and at such other times as may be appropriate, on the status and operation of the Executive Reserve program.

Sec. 8. Executive Order No. 10660 of February 15, 1956, entitled "Providing for the Establishment of a National Defense Executive Reserve," as amended, is hereby superseded.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By the way BC, I do have some training in Business and Constitutional law. Even so, I pulled that info up in 5 minutes off your own website. No need to even access my Law Library account...

You guys are sure that lucky a friend let me borrow his laptop for a few minutes.  
softaire
20-Jul-12, 20:50

Deleted by softaire on 20-Jul-12, 20:52.
softaire
20-Jul-12, 20:53

shamash
"Your best bet would be to get some army fatigues and crawl into a fox hole
to await the great Govt takeover by the Negro,/Muslim/Communist/socialist/ President."

That didn't really sound like a "discussion" to me. Did it to you?
brigadecommander
20-Jul-12, 20:59

his name is President Barrack Obama not 'BO'
The reconciliation you speak about has been used by the republicans too or have you chosen to forget about that?? 51-votes is a majority. As to the budgets, giving those tax cuts to wealthy Americans added billions to the deficit according to the CBO. GOING INTO A USELESS HORRIFIC War in Iraq added billions to the deficit. When you cut taxes the revenue has to be made up somehow. In states and in the federal GOVT. What happens then?? at the state level workers like teachers and firemen get laid off to offset the loss in revenue.. At the federal level Govt workers get laid off and Programs that help our fellow Americans get cut, All for what?? to give tax cuts to people and corporations that don't need it!! Besides being morally wrong it doesn't work fiscally!! it doesn't tinkle down as you guys say. The Job 'creators' create nothing but more and more and more revenue for themselves.If all this were true the Bush tax cuts would have created jobs and the economy should have boomed but they DID NOT!! jobs were lost and our economy spiraled down long before The present President came into office. Then because of the republican removal of regulations OF there friends on Wall street and in the Banks. Then they fleeced us for trillions. And worst of all (and the dems were at fault also but the Republicans had the majority and rubber stamped bushes agenda) worst of all was the War Crime of attacking the Iraqis. This was inexcusable!! immoral.hateful,. And you blame Obama for all this? Since you call my President 'BO' i call you phony nominee Mitt Romney..'MR' WHICH STANDS FOR 'MINDLESS REPROBATE'
brigadecommander
20-Jul-12, 21:27

breadcrumbs vs Semantics and conspiracy theorys
I looked at these orders. Bencok1 says they are designed by Obama to take over the govt and take away our rights. I looked and there is nothing sinister here as was alleged. They as he(bencox1) described don't exist!! are you trying to edit me? by saying i said something that i didn't? Most have been revoked.What is your point? In the event of War the President, any president has awesome powers. Again you play semantics. There is no evidence here of sinister nature. Read the ones that are high-lighted. Then tell me again whats your point? Do you know something i don't about these orders? if so send the link that explains the orders not highlighted. Send any credible link that shows Obama misusing executive orders. Remember Bush had far more executive orders that this president(President B Obama). Are his executive orders legal and Obamas not?
brigadecommander
20-Jul-12, 22:05

here is the full list of exectutive orders from 1800-now.
as you will see when you get to president obamas there is nothing sinister here. But the right wing will lie and confuse you into thinking otherwise. At best it is bad Hyperbole and at worst a complete disregard for the truth. en.wikipedia.org
battlefleet
20-Jul-12, 22:59

Janet oh Janet
Why do you bother with these people? There minds are made up and completely in the thrall of the likes of Shaun Hanity and Glen Beck.Let them spread there lies and falsehoods. They live in a hermetically sealed environment that stops reality from getting in. They are angry and deceived and you can not help them. You know you have your future secure here at NASA. We will explore the cosmos together. We all expect you here on the Aug4th. You have a seat in the control room as we land on Mars. What could be better??....Stephen
softaire
20-Jul-12, 23:14

the first thing you could do...
is to settle down and, at least, write so that your thoughts are compressible by the average human...

I mean, when you write in run-on, incessant, and incomprehensible sentences, it makes it impossible for anybody to understand your message.

You want to please regroup and try that again, so I can understand what you are saying, please?
shamash
20-Jul-12, 23:17

softy. . .
no it did not read like discussion,

but it was colourful,

as is the best of American invective,

and is right up there with Davy Crockett's

colorful:

"I am that same David Crockett, fresh from the backwoods, half
horse, half alligator, a little touched with the snapping-turtle.
I can wade the Mississippi, leap the Ohio, ride upon a streak of
lightning, and slip without a scratch down a honey-locust.
I can whip my weight in wildcats,
and, if any gentleman pleases, for a ten-dollar bill he can throw in a panther.
I can hug a bear too close for comfort,
and eat any man opposed to General Jackson."

and that's not discussion, either.
shamash
20-Jul-12, 23:30

stephen. . .
oh yes what a Party you have in store
when that ship you sent to Mars
November 26th --
almost like a Thanksgiving voyage --
touches down in a few days.

I applaud what you've achieved.


But when you say

<<"why do you bother with these people">>

please don't lump everyone together --

for instance,
I would be the first to say that although on political matters
I may disagree with them --
in fact I am likely to disagree with them --
yet --
I also find what thumper says of interest, and welcome what he says,
& I find what softy says is well-meant, if you are patient with his sense of humor,
and if you understand he is speaking from his experience,
and it is a perspective perhaps tinged with frustration --
the frustration of a patriot who suddenly senses his lack of power
even as his nation's most important election draws near.

And even in moments when they may sound
close-minded,
I know they still fundamentally are
good-hearted.
softaire
20-Jul-12, 23:42

Well.
It may be colorfull...

But, it certainly does not meet the authors' expectations of reasonable, intelligent and "fair" discussion. I expect more from somebody who seem so articulate, intelligent, and presumably fair (open to discussion).
brigadecommander
20-Jul-12, 23:45

softaire
OK i will write slow. But i think you guys understand me quite well.I do not take kindly Sir to asinine names and falsehoods against my President. When you do that you open yourself up to the same against yourself. If your gonna live by the sword.....Treat him with respect or you will get none from me. If you have a beef with something he did fine,but it had better be true and not just something cooked up on the right. For i will come down and come down hard without pity against lies. So clean up your rhetoric. There!! is that slow enough for you guys,clear enough?. My Family did not fight and die in ww1 and ww2 so you guys can re-write history.My Dad (a brigade commander in Vietnam) did not loose an arm in a unjust War serving his country so the right wing can tear it down because they don't like a colored Man as President!!
dieharder
20-Jul-12, 23:52

well this has been eye opening
There are rules on this club personal attacks on other members are not acceptable. Rebutals on public figures need to be done with hard facts not assumption and counter assumption. While this has been colourful it detracts from the purpose of the club which is an open mind and ssense of humour neither which appear very evident in this thread. We are not here to create enenemies please be nicer to each other. Even the politicians can be civil and have a drink together.
softaire
20-Jul-12, 23:52

BG
Fair enough.. if you will abide by the same.

I did not fight and see my friends die or get get mutilated in Vietnam to see their sacrifices
squandered away by the current President. So fair is fair... answer honestly my questions above about his Presidential Oder's... TRUE OR FALSE?
brigadecommander
21-Jul-12, 00:12

fair enough.
i will try my best. But i watched Bush 'squander away the best chance to get the perpetrator of 911. And then i saw this president sign a executive order to get him and he did. Actions speak far louder then words my friend!!!
battlefleet
21-Jul-12, 00:23

shamash
sorry for that!! I should have specified which people i was talking about. And it was not you. To be truthful i am concerned for my sister.I care nothing about enlightening cynical people. She will not stop her Defense of This president(she met him on several occasions). But she has much on her plate and i worry. Her Studies alone encompass many Sciences and disciplines. I don't want to see her distracted by a fools hope. Again sorry,my comment was aimed elsewhere....S
shamash
21-Jul-12, 00:34

everyone here
should kiss the ground and thank the Lord we still have people like Janet who can care with a passion
about the cause they believe in

and God save us from the jaded ones who have lost their capacity to care so much they could just lose the reins of control, they could explode they get so angry cause they care so much

thank God for that

I pray for more of these people in our world

if we are to have a future.
bencox1
21-Jul-12, 04:41

One Remark
I see people debating or arguing on both sides of the spectrum; the left and right. I think that we are losing on personnel freedoms squabbling over Barack or Mitt Romney. They are the same and the sooner we realize it the better. www.youtube.com
Neither one is good and both will trample the constitution and our personnel liberties.
riaannieman
21-Jul-12, 04:52

Closing arguments
Phew! What a read! And even more research!

Ladies end Gentlemen, I've been through all the arguments, counter arguments, proof, lies, truth, emotions, calm and the rest. Once again, I want to remind you all that personally I feel that I am objective; I am outside the situation you are discussing here, because no mention was made of South African politics. I am a trained analyst, I have many years experience of investigation, and I think of myself as an honest person.

In this thread, both arguments seem valid, depending on your point of view. I have come to the realization that neither opponent will convince the other camp, because of your subjective experience, point of view, and frame of reference. This conversation is going to get out of hand soon, and explode, and I want to avoid that. With your approval, I would like to lock this thread down, and prevent further discussion of your honorable president, his polices, laws and direction he is taking the mighty USA. Just for your information, he has done things that are good and bad for South Africa and Africa. Personally, I have no opinion of the man to the good or the bad, because he seems such a remote figure for me. So, if you all agree, I will lock this thread in a little more than 24 hours, at approximately 18:00 on Sunday, 2012/07/22, South African time. This is not an attempt to gag anybody, nor is it a license to break the rules of GameKnot, or the values and mores of the club. Please, stay calm, avoid personal attacks and slandering each other, and let's conclude this thread peacefully. Please don't open the same discussion under another thread- we want to avoid animosity between the club members.

Thank you to all the contributors; we appreciate your input.
Pages: 123
Go to the last post



GameKnot: play chess online, Internet chess league, monthly chess tournaments, chess teams, chess clubs, online chess puzzles, free online chess games database and more.