|
|
| |||||||
| From | Message | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 04:42 |
 TA's newest Queen sacrifice blitz games for 2015I have a question for my critics.Do you honestly think that YOU could do nearly as well as me playing a Queen sacrifice and win like I do,simply because your opponent is say,400 points below you in rating?Or if your,for example,a 2000 rated,that you would simply defeat any 1500-1600 player in blitz sacrificing your Queen on move # 3 ???????????????????? I seriously doubt it.It took me decades of honing my skills to do these things.You critics talk big,but usually cannot back them up like me!Talk is cheap,but my actions prove otherwise.You try it if you think your so good!You will win once in a while,but not in the quantities I spit out! I guarantee it! First of all,I have no control over who I play in the blitz room,not on GK anyway,other sites yes....where you can select your opponent by rating parameters.Next,yes,many or most of my opponents are lesser rated than me,but so is 99% of all the opponents on GK rated less than me when I am finally up to my 2500 rating again!And finally,giving up my Q on move #3 kind of MORE than evens the playing field,now dosen't it critics?Especially with players north of 1800!Some would say north of 1500,but that is relative.Hey,8 or 9 point lead on move #3?????And that is not giving you enough of a level playing field to kill me even if you are 1400 rated????So you "mouths" that say this and that about me....zip it!!!Come on now, 8 or 9 point lead for those guys on move #3?!But as you can easily check out many of my Q sac wins are against players as high as 2300-2400!!!!Not possible you are thinking?Think again!The proof is in that old Q sac game link in the other post!!!!!Check it out anytime!I command you!There is a host of 1800 to 2000 rated wins as well!Plus,and as I said before,blitz is not all about mating your opponent,it is about TIMING-OUT your opponent as well.Just as good in my book for blitz anyway.In addition many of those so called 1200 rated opponents are not actually 1200 rated!!!Some are very high in strength(I can tell and I lost from a good handful!).This is due to the fact that some 1200 rated remain on GK to just play blitz and do not play any long correspondence games here,so then they do not get an official rating.I know personally of 2 or 3 -1200 rated that are at least 2100-2200 in actual playing strength.I can tell from the tactics and strategy they use against me! So,I will post as I play with my usual gallows humor in this thread.Don't mind my jokes in this thread,its my alter ego when I play and win being a Queen down.You have no idea how hard it is to win sometimes,regardless of my opponents rating strength!Got that critics of mine?These blitz games are really an open lesson in how some players are overconfident in their play,and how they lack positional moves in the opening play,tactics,not exchanging pieces when they should and a host of other things.You may not believe this,but many times the way an opponent plays in blitz gives a pattern of how they play in a long correspondence game!Some of the weakness's they have are simply magnified in blitz when they come across TA! So,enjoy some of these gems or talk crap about me for trying to take advantage of the lesser rated,but see,i'm ripping off both of my arms and only fighting with my legs when I hand the less rated my Queen!If that is not fair,then I don't know what is?Sacrifice both my Rooks and my Queen?Come on now!!!!Where would it end?Ridiculous. So there are things to learn here and yes,it is a fair blitz game to the lesser rated given the fact I am severely handicapping myself!!!!!See? Now on with the bloodbath!Prepare to gasp on occasion or laugh yourself into a frenzy so hard that you will foam from the mouth! PGN board links...important! When viewing any of my Q sac games,you may want to use one of the PGN game links below to plug in the game and then create diagrams of various key positions as the game progress's.Might make for a better visual read and learning experience.You may have to erase the 1-0 or possibly the # at the end of the game when you copy and before you paste into one of the viewers below.(Sometimes I forget to remove the win symbols). chesstempo.com www.365chess.com www.chess.com |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 04:48 |
Joseph,meet Joe your guide into the "Mangling Rooks" of death! This game is more than fair for my opponent,1200 or most any rating.And do not forget what I said about those 1200 rated above!In fact,I killed my Q in an even weaker ploy than my other styles of play,by taking my opponents h7 pawn!Normally I take my opponents f7 pawn and then he is forced to take my Q with his King.There is a hidden value in taking his f7 pawn!First of all as you may have read in my other post,the f7 pawn and the f7 square is one of the weakest squares on the chess board.And when he moves his King to capture,he then is ALSO forced to give up his castling rights as the game progress's.I will prey on this theme,BUT this game is an exception.I will seek out the slightest weakness,my opponent has and rip it wide open,but not this game because I took his h7 pawn,not his f7 pawn.Starting to get my strategy readers?But in this game...my "strategy" is so weak,its the equivalent of trying to place a washing machine on a plain wooden toothpick and balancing it without breaking it! But I succeed! Too tired right now to rip apart this game to annotate a bit like I usually do.I will in future games!I just wanted to post at least one game tonight.Part of my opponents opening problem,as you may observe,is his random pawn moves early in the game.Even opening up that c6 pawn on move #5 to leave room for his Queen should have been delayed.By move #26 my opponent is already exposing his Queen to attack and then his blunder on move #32 begins his serious demise. Once his Q is gone,the ranks and files of my connected Rooks do a perfect bowling ball dance till strike! Hope you enjoyed this first game.Better ones coming! [Event "GameKnot Blitz"] [Date "2015.08.15"] [Round "-"]5 min,zero increment [White "tactical-abyss"]2273 [Black "joseph82501"]1200 [Result "1-0"] 1. e4 f6 2. Qh5+ g6 3. Qxh7 Rxh7 4. Nf3 e5 5. Nc3 c6 6. d4 d6 7. dxe5 dxe5 8. Bc4 Nh6 9. O-O Qe7 10. h3 Be6 11. Bb3 Bxb3 12. axb3 g5 13. Nh2 Qe6 14. Be3 g4 15. h4 f5 16. Bxa7 Nd7 17. Rfd1 fxe4 18. Be3 Nf5 19. Rxa8+ Kf7 20. Nxe4 Nxe3 21. Ng5+ Kf6 22. Nxh7+ Kg7 23. Nxf8 Nxf8 24. fxe3 Ng6 25. g3 e4 26. Kg2 Qf5 27. Rdd8 Ne5 28. Rg8+ Kh7 29. Rh8+ Kg7 30. Rag8+ Kf6 31. Rh6+ Ke7 32. Rg5 Qf3+ 33. Nxf3 exf3+ 34. Kf2 Nd7 35. Rg7+ Kd8 36. Rd6 Kc7 37. Rdxd7+ Kb6 38. Rxb7+ Kc5 39. Rg6 Kd5 40. e4+ Kd4 41.Rg5 c5 42.Re7 c4 43.Rd5# Position after move # 3 for white !! My opponent after my move #3 must be thinking...who is this nut?I'm going to kick his butt into the exosphere! Think again Joe!This is TA,not some normal blitz player! |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 04:49 |
Maybe my opponent was drunk?Who knows,I don't care...winning is winning!! 1.e4,c5 2.Qh5,Nf6 3.Qxf7+,Kxf7 4.Nc3,b6 5.Nf3,Bb7 6.Ng5+,Kg8 7.Bc4+,e6 8.Nxe6,dxe6 9.Bxe6# Ya ya,I know critics.He simply blundered.But that's life in the fast lane of blitz!Still a nice short one! |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 04:58 |
Recopied response from Jkarp: "In fact, this is a similar but it happened a while back. For those that are wondering, I used to argue that losing your Q meant a loss, if I felt that it was no good reason. But, with this game, I know otherwise and it resulted in a game against easy19, where I lost during the endgame, despite starting a Q up." gameknot.com |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 05:47 |
Deleted by deeper_insight on 15-Aug-15, 07:35.
|
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 07:35 |
Oh,let me add something to my "critics" There is many hidden things going on in a 3 or 5 minute blitz game! Some of you players see a game above like with joseph82501(1200 rated) and say...."see that opponent of yours simply blundered that Q,so he played like total crap,its no wonder you won that easy game!I could do the same!" Unquote. No,not necessarily!Think again! Well,those are words from inexperienced blitz know it all's!They view many of my games through the eye's of mainly a long correspondence chess view,where someone has days to look over a position.Of course,the same error would probably not have occurred with my opponent above if he had 3 days to look the board over!But you cannot compare long corresp to blitz,that would be your first mistake!But there is an even deeper thing going on in my blitz games.See,its many times what leads up to his error(s) or blunders that is the ROOT of his errors and/or blunders in the first place!!!!!!!!!!!!I place a tremendous degree of experienced pressure and complexity on my opponents,squeeze THEIR pieces,engage multiple ex-ray attacks,pawn storms and much more....this many times(regardless of rating)throws his brain into a frenzy,longer think state and even a brain freeze!Then I mount the pressure even MORE!Many times the result is that their clock has run down considerably and when that happens......MORE ERRORS AND BLUNDERS OCCUR on my opponents side due to time running out for them!!!!!!!So critics,there is much more going on in my blitz games than meets the eye!!!!!!You see a blunder or error or trap on some move #30 from some,say,1700+player that you are saying to yourself(as mainly a corresp player)..."I would never have done a stupid move like that!"......but you could easily be wrong under the circumstances based upon WHAT LED UP TO THAT MOVE #30 AND THE STRATEGY,PRESSURES,PLOYS AND OTHER SECRET TACTICAL METHODS EMPLOYED THAT I USE LEADING UP TO THAT 1700 RATED PLAYERS MOVE#30. Well,i'm done attempting to explain some of these things to either critics or scoffers. Let the games begin!Better and more to come soon! In the meantime,you can always check my other Q sac post out,lurking in my club list somewhere! |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 09:36 |
Deleted by deeper_insight on 15-Aug-15, 09:46.
|
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 09:46 |
Deleted by deeper_insight on 15-Aug-15, 09:54.
|
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 09:54 |
Open files resulting in the white hot lava pit body wash.... [Event "GameKnot Blitz"] [Date "2015.08.15"] [Round "-"] [White "kavayah1"]1564 [Black "tactical-abyss"]2283 [Result "0-1"] 1. e4 e6 2. Be2 Qh4 3. d3 Qxf2+ 4. Kxf2 Bd6 5. h3 Ne7 6. Bg5 f6 7. Bh4 O-O 8. c3 Nbc6 9. Bg3 f5 10. Bxd6 fxe4+ 11. Kg3 Nf5+ 12. Kh2 Nxd6 13. dxe4 Nxe4 14. Nf3 Nf2 15. Qd2 Nxh1 16. Kxh1 d6 17. Na3 a6 18. Bd3 Bd7 19. Ng5 h6 20. Nf3 Rf6 21. Qc2 Raf8 22. Bh7+ Kh8 23. Nh4 Ne5 24. Be4 Rf2 25. Qb3 R2f4 26. Ng6+ Nxg6 27. Bxg6 b6 28. Nc2 a5 29. Nd4 R8f6 30. Bc2 e5 31. Nf3 Bc6 32. Bd1 a4 33. Qc2 e4 34. Nd4 Rf1+ 35. Kh2 R6f2 36. Qc1 e3 37. Qxe3 Rxg2# 0-1 |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 10:21 |
Diagram of above game,near the end of his demise... Notice the wide open f file and the semi open e file and open centralized ranks.Key breeding ground for connected Rooks! |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 13:34 |
The defense of the slippery greased eel! [Event "GameKnot Blitz"] [Date "2015.08.15"] [Round "-"] [White "mannaprime"]1466 [Black "tactical-abyss"]2283 [Result "0-1"]Opponent timed-out 1. e4 c6 2. d4 Qa5+ 3. Bd2 Qxa2 4. Rxa2 d6 5. Nf3 h6 6. Nc3 g5 7. h3 Bg7 8. e5 d5 9. Ne2 Be6 10. Ng3 a6 11. Nh5 Bf8 12. h4 g4 13. Nh2 c5 14. dxc5 g3 15. fxg3 Nc6 16. Bb5 Rc8 17. Ba4 Bf5 18. Qf3 Bd7 19. O-O Rh7 20. Qxd5 Be6 21. Qe4 Rh8 22. c4 Bd7 23. Rxf7 Kxf7 24. e6+ Bxe6 25. Nf4 Ke8 26. Qxe6 Rc7 27. Nd5 Rc8 28. Bc3 b5 29. cxb5 Bg7 30. b6 Kf8 31. Bxc6 Rxc6 32. Qxc6 Kf7 33. Rxa6 Bxc3 34. Ra7 Bd4+ 35. Kf1 Bf6 36. Rxe7+ Bxe7 0-1 After whites time out on move #36.I'd say,as early as move 30,he had over 1 minute to mate me.I just kept slip sliding away!Goes to show that players like mannaprime need to be in a club like mine in order to improve their endgame mating play!My guess is that this player simply has not practiced endgame tactics at all.Hey,he's from NJ...that answers it!Ha ha! Next! |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 13:40 |
Deleted by deeper_insight on 15-Aug-15, 13:42.
|
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 13:41 |
By the way,notice in the game above(mannaprime).... Hmmmmmm...... |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
deeper_insight 15-Aug-15, 19:13 |
Yes,blitz is not for everyone and in some cases it can be harmful to a 1400 player.This guy should NOT play blitz at all(or very little),and concentrate at getting better in the long time control games.I noticed that in 2 years he has only played 107 games which indicates a pattern that he is probably hanging around the blitz room way too much with vultures like me.Its interesting to note that he had slowed down so much in 3 spots in our game,that I actually had time to click on his name and look at his profile as such....checking how long he has been on GK,the amount of games under his belt and where he is from!Even these facts,can show me how to play against this dude!Sounds odd,but if I seen he was from Russia and he had about 2000 games under his belt(corresp),I would have probably played more seriously. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
deeper_insight 17-Aug-15, 18:14 |
Perhaps you should start your own thread in this club on any annotations you chose,your own or speaking about players games.Please feel free to do so if you want. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
deeper_insight 23-Nov-15, 09:20 |
The razor fork of swift and EARLY destruction.... [Site gameknot.com/"] [Date "2015.11.23"] [Round "-"]5 min,zero increment [White "tactical-abyss"]2370 [Black "boriskhurgin"]1843 [Result "1-0"]Boris was in a mating net of 7 moves or so by move #42 1. e4 e5 2. Qh5 Nc6 3. Qxf7+ Kxf7 4. Bc4+ d5 5. Bxd5+ Be6 6. Bxc6 bxc6 7. Nf3 Qf6 8. d4 exd4 9. Bg5 Qg6 10. Ne5+ Ke8 11. Nxg6 hxg6 12. Nd2 Be7 13. Nf3 Bg4 14. Bf4 Bxf3 15. gxf3 Rc8 16. O-O-O c5 17. c3 g5 18. Bg3 Nf6 19. cxd4 cxd4 20. Rxd4 Nh5 21. Ra4 Nxg3 22. fxg3 Bc5 23. Ra5 Bb6 24. Re5+ Kf7 25. Kc2 Rhd8 26. Rxg5 Be3 27. Rf5+ Kg8 28. Re1 Bb6 29. f4 Rd4 30. e5 Rcd8 31. Re2 g6 32. Rg5 Kf7 33. b3 Ba5 34. e6+ Ke7 35. Rxa5 Rd1 36. Rxa7 Ra1 37. Kb2 Rdd1 38. Rxc7+ Ke8 39. Rg7 Rab1+ 40. Ka3 Rd6 41. e7 Ra6+ 42. Kb4 1-0 chesstempo.com Borishurgin,a nearly 1900 rated player has an abundance of positional errors in theory right out of the opening few moves,including simply bring out his Queen to start(mistake),then placing his Q in front of his exposed King on move #7,then allowing my amazing Knight fork on move # 10....which almost equalized the game within 2 pawn values by move #11.Technically,the game was over already by move # 10 in my book!Feel free to add your own comments if you like in the meantime.Notice his pawn moves in the opening 4....d5.This is not controlling the center,its only giving me more material.A common mistake that players make in my Q sac games.I spot the pattern immediately and know the game will usually end up in my favor,just from that pawn thrust move alone on blacks side.Boris was in a mating net and in serious trouble(as he knew),so he resigned early before mate and scurried away quickly.I have a game in my Q sac thread somewhere else where I beat Boris before.Perhaps it is similar,I have not checked yet. So what is the lesson here?There seems to be a serious lack of tactics with Boris,but even more so,a weak positional strategy with things like Q thrust moves early on and doubled pawns by mid game on the g file that were open to attack and needed to be supported...and were not.Theory dictates that doubled pawns in the opening like in some Ruy games and some Trompowski Attack games either diminish the pawn value combination only fractionally or not at all.But in mid and endgame,doubled pawns are more open to attack,especially if centralized or on b or g files.This is magnified if the opposing side has a pawn majority(as I did) on my Kings side that can be utilized as an exchange,file opener to blacks King,ex-ray or P=Q on the 8th rank promotion. Sure,mistakes happen in 5 minutes.But technically,that should not matter in just the first few moves of this game.Boris's "pattern"of erratic and weaker moves proves he needs to buckle down on just some of the simpler areas of opening theory.For even if the game was a 2 minute game with zero increment(like on some other chess sites),his early Q moves and pawn thrusts should not have occurred,especially for a nearly 1900 rated player. So,even in blitz games as opposed to the long corresp games,some of these same positional strategy moves ARE mirrored and carried over the same way in games with longer time controls.So the "excuse"..."well,I would not have made those errors if I had 3 days to think about the moves"is not always a valid statement!I have gone into many a players long games and still see the same or similar pattern of tactical and positional weakness errors being made in games with long time controls.I have no doubt that if I took the time to look over a hundred or two hundred of Boris's long games,that I would discover similar mistakes.But I have no time for that.I have seen it many times before,however. So that is the mini lesson.Sometimes,how you react in the first few moves of a blitz game is a strong indication of how you may very well perform in a long game.At the very least it becomes an open book at where you failed to read the book of theory completely and missed a few chapters! So,are there things to learn from these quick Q sacrifice games of mine?You bet there is. I give you my Q on move # 3 and capture only one compensation pawn in return,and they begin to lose in just a few moves in the opening as Boris did above?This should NOT be!!!! I should be destroyed much easier!Just by playing defensively and/or even exchanging the major pieces is enough in the 101 theory dept to stomp on me.When you become too aggressive in the opening against a very strong player who sets up "booby traps" all over the place,you are inviting yourself to fall into my abyss. TA |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 27-Nov-15, 16:11 |
Deleted by deeper_insight on 28-Nov-15, 03:55.
|
||||||
|
deeper_insight 28-Nov-15, 03:54 |
Leave your door open and evil will enter eventually... Is 1505 weak?No,not really,its average in rating. [Event "GameKnot Blitz"] [Site gameknot.com/"] [Date "2015.11.27"] [Round "-"] [White "jisinc"]1505 [Black "tactical-abyss"]2370 [Result "0-1"]Mate 1. d4 c6 2. e4 Qa5+ 3. c3 Qxa2 4. Rxa2 d6 5. Bd3 Be6 6. Ra1 h6 7. Nf3 Nd7 8. h3 Ngf6 9. e5 Nd5 10. exd6 exd6 11. Qb3 b5 12. O-O Ne3 13. Qa3 Nxf1 14. Kxf1 a5 15. b4 a4 16. Be3 Be7 17. Nbd2 Nb6 18. Ne4 Nc4 19. Bxc4 Bxc4+ 20. Kg1 Be6 21. Qc1 Kd7 22. Nh2 f5 23. Ng3 Raf8 24. Nh5 g5 25. Qd2 Rhg8 26. Qb2 f4 27. Bd2 Bf7 28. g4 fxg3 e.p. 29. Nxg3 Bd8 30. Be3 Be6 31. Kg2 h5 32. Nxh5 Rh8 33. Ng3 Bxh3+ 34. Kg1 Be6 35. Ne4 Bd5 36. Nxg5 Rh5 37. Ngf3 Rxf3 38. Nxf3 Bxf3 39. Qb1 Rh1# 0-1 chesstempo.com Take notice to the final mate position on move # 39 above.Even if whites K was able to move out of check,he still would have the ex-ray attack of his Q.Also take note to whites much superior(but useless) point value overall in the endgame.Count it up.White has a value of 21 points.Black has a point value of only 15 points....6 points less than white.Yet,whites position,tempo and inactive Rook on a1 devalues the true point value of his pieces in a mega way.If whites tempo was on par,he could have began moving his Q and R and destroyed me.But opening up his files(with my help,of course) prevents his point value lead from accomplishing anything. Oh well,on to the next "victim"!Now where did I put that chainsaw? |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 28-Nov-15, 05:00 |
Just some additional notes with the blitz game above... Interesting enough,I can remember in 8th grade being around 1500-1600 in rating.I knew even as far back then after reading a few of Walter Korns footnotes that leaving your K strutting around wide open files is suicide.Maintaining some pawn protection is most often key.The exception being when most of the major pieces are off the board(unlike the game above).Then,the "opposite"many times SHOULD occur....whereas the King should become more active and begin aggressive attack movements,even in wide open unprotected space(many times).So many players fail at this,I cannot count on a calculator!Even 1800 rated players create way too many open files as well as lack the know how to King shuttle properly in the endgame with scant pieces left on the board.Or they know how to K shuttle,but "delayed"the movement way way too long,losing tempo and initiative....costing them the game.I must delve into the "timing factor"one day in the club to test players knowledge on this issue. But even if "I"was 1505 rated,I guarantee that I would NOT have left my files open like that!I remember exactly how I played back then and have the scoresheets yet.So are all 1505 rated players created equal?Absolutely not!Too many players use the rating number in what I call a "chess cliche" and blame this and that position/blunder ect ect ect ect on a rating number.A 1505 player may be weaker in some areas,but to point the finger "automatically"on,for example,a fact of "open files"every time it occurs is due to my opponents 1500+rating is absurd thinking.I can show you games of many 1000 rated players who know better! Chess theory must be consistently learned,utilized,remembered,practiced and burned into your "id".Even in 5 minute games,those same theories learned should surface from your subconscious memory to your active conscious memory instantly in the form of pattern recognition.If not,then at least in your long corresp games. |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 28-Nov-15, 11:58 |
Follow me into gloomy dessert,then battle my elephants.... Ever hear the statement...."retreat is not an option"? Well,in my case retreat with my forces(as you can see if you go through many of the early moves)happens time and time again.The purpose is to stretch my opponents knowledge of theory to the limit,stretch his forces out,let him become the aggressor while I seek out the slightest weakness,then turn around and destroy.Like leading an army into the desert,dwindling their resources of water,food,strength,patience,ego,overconfidence,pride and overall good spirits and turn all of that against them when I turn and face that army later on in the game.Lots of tombstones in that dessert,most are not mine. That Q of mine did this opponent no good sacrificed on move #3,although I give him good credit for trying harder than many other players.He did quite well considering his rating.57 moves against me using my advanced duck and weave tactics(even with my Q sac) is worth honorable mention,so I put it in my club thread. [Event "GameKnot Blitz"] [Site //gameknot.com/"] [Date "2015.11.28"] [Round "-"]5 min,zero increment [White "tactical-abyss"]2370 [Black "olandsviking"]1545 [Result "1-0"] 1. e4 c5 2. Qh5 d6 3. Qxf7+ Kxf7 4. Nf3 Nf6 5. e5 dxe5 6. Bc4+ Ke8 7. O-O Nc6 8. Re1 Qc7 9. Nc3 e6 10. Nb5 Qb8 11. Rb1 a6 12. Nc3 b5 13. Bf1 Nb4 14. Rd1 Nxc2 15. d3 Nd4 16. Ng5 h6 17. Nge4 Bb7 18. f3 Nd5 19. Bd2 Qa7 20. Nf2 Nxc3 21. bxc3 Ne2+ 22. Bxe2 c4 23. Be1 Bc5 24. dxc4 bxc4 25. Bxc4 Ke7 26. Bd3 Rhd8 27. Kf1 Bd5 28. c4 Bc6 29. Ng4 Bd4 30. Bg6 a5 31. Bh4+ Kf8 32. Bxd8 Rxd8 33. Nxe5 Qa6 34. Rbc1 Ke7 35. Nxc6+ Qxc6 36. Rc2 e5 37. Be4 Qc5 38. Rb1 Rd7 39. Rb5 Qa3 40. Rb3 Qd6 41. g3 Bc5 42. Bd5 Ba7 43. Re2 Kf6 44. Kg2 Qc5 45. Rb1 h5 46. Rbe1 Re7 47. h4 g5 48. hxg5+ Kxg5 49. f4+ exf4 50. Rxe7 Qf2+ 51. Kh1 fxg3 52. R1e5+ Kf6 53. R5e6+ Kg5 54. Rg7+ Kh4 55. Re4+ Qf4 56. Rxf4+ Kh3 57. Be6# 1-0 chesstempo.com |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 28-Nov-15, 17:11 |
[Event "GameKnot Blitz"] [Site gameknot.com/"] [Date "2015.11.28"] [Round "-"] [White "boriskhurgin"]1842 [Black "tactical-abyss"]2370 [Result "0-1"]Boris resigns with a mate in 4 1. e4 e6 2. d4 Qh4 3. Nc3 Qxf2+ 4. Kxf2 d6 5. e5 dxe5 6. dxe5 a6 7. Nf3 Nc6 8. Be3 Bd7 9. Bc4 Nge7 10. Qe2 Ng6 11. Rhd1 Be7 12. Bg5 Bxg5 13. Nxg5 Ncxe5 14. Bb3 O-O-O 15. Nce4 h6 16. Nf3 Ng4+ 17. Kg1 Bb5 18. Bc4 Nf4 19. Rxd8+ Rxd8 20. Qe1 Bxc4 21. b3 Be2 22. h3 Ne3 23. Kf2 Nxc2 24. Qc1 Nd3+ 25. Kxe2 Nxc1+ 26. Rxc1 Nb4 27. Rd1 Nxa2 28. Rxd8+ Kxd8 29. Ne5 Nc1+ 30. Kd1 Nxb3 31. Nxf7+ Ke7 32. Ne5 Nd4 33. Kd2 b6 34. Kd3 Nb5 35. Nc4 a5 36. Nc3 Nxc3 37. Kxc3 Kf6 38. g3 h5 39. Ne3 Ke5 40. Kd3 b5 41. Ng2 g5 42. h4 gxh4 43. Nxh4 c5 44. Nf3+ Kd5 45. Ng5 c4+ 46. Ke3 a4 47. Ne4 a3 48. Nc3+ Kc5 49. Na2 b4 50. Kd2 b3 51. Nc3 a2 52. Ne4+ Kd4 53. Nf2 b2 54. Ke2 a1Q 0-1 chesstempo.com |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 06-Dec-15, 13:25 |
raallmighty may want to change his handle name... No"might"in the blitz game below for another 1800+player here.And my Q sac is of the weaker type,sacing my opponents h7 pawn,not an f7 pawn in this game.So,I get really no positional micro advantage at all.Well,not immediately anyway!Now how do I begin to equalize?Hmmmm...lets try a Knight pin on move #17!Then follow up with a nice pawn capture on move #20.....a potential Rook sacrifice,with poison.If my opponent takes the beckoning poisoned Rook in this fast paced game(and my opponent is already down over 60 seconds now),then I would be able to fork his K and Q and capture his Queen.He does not fall for it.Hmmmm.Well,then what next?Move's #21-23(ex-ray)on his King and Bishop(note the theory of a Rook on the 7th rank!)...leading to more points being taken back,a pawn and a Bishop.In the end and by move #24 I had exactly 2:35 minutes left and my opponent had 0:13 seconds left in the game.He resigned rather than time-out,and I commend him for that and he mentioned..."well done,way better and very well".If you count up the piece values in the end of the game,my opponent has a total of 22 points and I have 20 point values.Only a difference of 2 points.But as hard as it is to believe...my position on the board with the pawn structure control,connected Knights,more powerful Bishop,less powerful Knight of my opponent with advancing restrictions and the increased safety of my King as opposed to my opponents King resting on that more open g file,my 7th rank powerful Rook and my opponents loss of initiative with his unused Rook on a8=EQUALITY!!!!!Yes,even with that 2 point advantage and transferring the game over from move #24,into a long corresp game...I would not fear losing from that position,even being 2 points down.Drawing yes at the worse case scenario,but not losing.Proof?Any time grasshopper!I always put my money where my mouth is!!!(But only after a critical analysis!) [Event "GameKnot Blitz"] [Site //gameknot.com/"] [Date "2015.12.06"] [Round "-"]5 min,zero increment [White "tactical-abyss"]2370 [Black "raallmighty"]1811 [Result "1-0"]Opponent resigns,but would have timed-out anyway and lost. 1. e4 e6 2. Qh5 g6 3. Qxh7 Rxh7 4. Nf3 Nc6 5. d4 Bg7 6. c3 d5 7. e5 Bd7 8. Bd3 Nge7 9. Bg5 Bh6 10. Nbd2 Bxg5 11. Nxg5 Rh8 12. h4 Nf5 13. O-O-O Rxh4 14. Ndf3 Rxh1 15. Rxh1 Ke7 16. Rh7 Be8 17. g4 Kf8 18. gxf5 gxf5 19. Rh6 Kg7 20. Rxe6 Bd7 21. Rf6 Qh8 22. Rxf7+ Kg6 23. Rxd7 Qh1+ 24. Kc2 1-0 chesstempo.com |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 06-Dec-15, 13:47 |
PGN board transfer reminder.... That chesstempo link that I post along with many of my blitz games makes it incredibly easy to view the blitz game move for move on a nice chess board.All you do is copy the game from any of my blitz games using your mouse and then paste the game into the PGN box in that chesstempo board link.Then click on any move in that new move list and you can analyze along side my comments,including my destructo gallows humor chat.Even in my "humor"there is always an embedded message of instructive and constructive teaching lessons!May not appear that way,but it is my way of telling my opponents and YOU to wake up and smell the coffee!Overconfidence is abundant in the blitz rooms,and I tend to vaporize those psychological thrilling moments that my opponents have when they think or write in the chat area...."I got you TA,your mine with your foolish,dumb Q sacrifice move!" Really?What stinky and crummy bathroom stall did you read that from?In the subway train station at midnight in NYC?Ha,ha! TA |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 06-Dec-15, 14:26 |
Last blitz lesson for this evening: Never feel bad for "my"silly moves,try to equalize by making foolish moves on purpose or play dumb against me on purpose,trying to "mirror me"and even attempt to do what I do!I can get away with that in my vast experiences,but a 1533 rated player?Don't even try.Just play to kill me fast,not fool around and get flattened to less than the diameter of a quark in just a few moves!!!!! I'm not going to annotate this game.Just take a look(if you desire)at my opponent playing a King shuttling game all the way down to g8 on my side where I mated him in 15 moves.After his loss,he shuttled away from my board much faster than his King moves on my board.Is there anything smaller than a quark?Ill have to investigate that after a few martinis! [Event "GameKnot Blitz"] [Site "//gameknot.com/"] [Date "2015.12.06"] [Round "-"]5 min,zero increment [White "rrrrrrrandom"]1533 [Black "tactical-abyss"]2370 [Result "0-1"]Mate,no time-out in 15 moves 1. c4 e6 2. Nc3 Qh4 3. e3 Qxf2+ 4. Kxf2 h5 5. Kg3 Bd6+ 6. Kh4 Nf6 7. e4 Ng4 8. Qxg4 hxg4+ 9. Kxg4 f5+ 10. Kg5 fxe4 11. Nxe4 Be7+ 12. Kg6 Rh6+ 13. Kxg7 Bf8+ 14. Kg8 Nc6 15. d3 Ne7# 0-1 chesstempo.com If you try to mirror me,your "mirror"will get broken into a googolplex of quark pieces as quickly as the game right here.Just FYI.Lesson over for tonight. TA |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
rrrrrandom game... |
||||||
|
deeper_insight 06-Dec-15, 16:57 |
I think my opponent above just thought that I was simply fooling around as a joke.No,i'm as serious and concentrative as a cruise missile tuned to be on target precisely.You are committing sextuple suicide if you plan to move your King into my territory,unless there is only a scant amount of pieces left on the board.Your survival rate would be the equivalent of standing in the middle of a small high school football field while 1000 B-52's dropped 180 million laser guided heavy titanium regulation sized bowling balls directly down on you from 50,000 feet altitude and you had to remain perfectly still.Ha,ha!Good luck!!! |
||||||
| |||||||
