|
|
| From | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
 How We Have Been "Blinded by Science"Physical experiments have not been done to prove the Theory of Relativity. EXAMPLE 1/2 of an empty glass may be designated as “1/2 E” And I/2 of a half-filled glass may be designated as “1/2 F” Now we can say truthfully “1/2 E = ½ F” Now let us multiply “1/2 E = 1/2 F” by 2; that will result in E = F! This is a lie. Many other such mathematical equations have replaced observable experiments and proofs in the real world. “Science at the Crossroads” by Herbert Dingle succinctly describes the current make-believe world which science is operating in. One reviewer said this: “A devastating critique of the dogma that poses as science May 22, 2012 Format: Hardcover Herbert Dingle was a philosopher of science and one of the most knowledgeable people on the subject of Special Relativity who, when he later realised the theory was untenable and tried to do something about it, was roundly ignored and sequestered by an establishment which refuses to hold itself to the standards it publicly espouses. Science At The Crossroads was Dingle's last attempt to get the scientific establishment to answer a simple question which, to this day, has not been answered publicly by any mainstream "scientist". The fact that his very simple question (what differentiates between 2 identical clocks to make one go faster than the other, and therefore make the other go slower) has not been answered clearly shows that scientists today have no right to bear the name and certainly have no right to castigate the rest of the public for not behaving in a "sceintific" enough fashion on this or any other subject. In the first part of the book Dingle documents at length the evasions and distortions of scientists and academics, many of whom were prepared to admit privately that they agreed with Dingle yet subsequently refused to say so publicly. The second part contains a detailed treatment of the deficiences of the theory itself. Whilst easy to read and follow what is (supposedly!) a highly technical subject, the book is depressing and alarming in the extreme; this is exactly why Dingle wrote it. Today, in light of some theories that suggest the Large Hardron Collider at Cern may be responsible for some of the large earthquakes of recent months and years, it is of course not surprising that the ignoramuses in charge of this collossal waste of time and money crack on regardless with not the slightest heed to any possible danger, and this is the whole point: real scientists are supposed to stop and take a step back when someone taps them on the shoulder and tells them that the office is on fire. Yet the results so far from Cern demonstrate quite clearly that those "scientists" who like to play with fire at humanity's expense do not know what they are talking about or what they are doing ("we've rechecked the speed of light over and over and found no problem": how, exactly, have they checked & confirmed the speed of light), and this situation will only deteriorate until Dingle's worst nightmare finally comes to pass. One hopes that the scientific establishment will wake up before it is too late; one however suspects that it is already far far far too late. www.amazon.com “#21 Is the Earth a Sphere? Why So Many Failed Helicentric Experiments? NOTABLE HELIOCENTRIC EXPERIMENTS THAT “FAILED” TO DETECT ANY MOVEMENT OF THE EARTH AROUND THE SUN For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Romans 1:18 There was a group of early “scientists” that decided that their heliocentric pronouncements would be proved and accepted. They conducted various experiments to prove that the earth moves around the sun. Unsurprisingly, these experiments FAILED–and they knew it–but they covered this information up. In their corrupt minds, heliocentrism had to disprove the Bible, no matter what the cost–so instead of being scientific and accepting that the earth does not move, they decided to hold the truth in unrighteousness. They suppressed the truth like any liar would. False science could not and can not prove the motion of the earth because it does not move. It is not a planet (“wanderer”). Those early false scientists are the authors of the textbooks that today’s “scientists” and authors consult. The students who have learned from them are worse off than they are (Matthew 23:15) because these students actually believe the earth moves whereas the original false scientists knew that they were wrong. SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS. Most scientists know about the Michelson-Morely experiment – that failed to detect any movement of the earth round the sun. This had to be overcome so the Fitzgerald-Lorentz shortening of the apparatus was proposed, and eventually the paradoxical Relativity Theory was invented by Einstein to overcome this problem. However, there are three other experiments that have been deliberately ignored by universities because they support geocentricity – (a) The Michelson-Gale experiment (Reference – Astrophysical Journal 1925 v 61 pp 140-5 – I forgot to put this reference in my book!) This detected the aether passing the surface of the earth with an accuracy of 2% of the speed of the daily rotation of the earth! Thus, the Michelson-Morely experiment detected no movement of the earth around the sun, yet the Michelson-Gale experiment measured the earth’s rotation (or the aether’s rotation around the earth!) to within 2%! This surely speaks volumes for geocentricity. (b) “Airey’s failure” (Reference – Proc. Roy. Soc. London v 20 p 35). Telescopes have to be very slightly tilted to get the starlight going down the axis of the tube because of the earth’s “speed around the sun”. Airey filled a telescope with water that greatly slowed down the speed of the light inside the telescope and found that he did not have to change the angle of the telescope. This showed that the starlight was already coming in at the correct angle so that no change was needed. This demonstrated that it was the stars moving relative to a stationary earth and not the fast orbiting earth moving relative to the comparatively stationary stars. If it was the telescope moving he would have had to change the angle. [emphasis BiblicalScholarship.net] (c) The Sagnac experiment (Reference – Comptes Rendus 1913 v157 p 708-710 and 1410-3) Sagnac rotated a table complete with light and mirrors with the light being passed in opposite directions around the table between the mirrors. He detected the movement of the table by the movement of the interference fringes on the target where they were recombined. This proved that there IS an aether that the light has to pass through and this completely destroys Einstein’s theory of Relativity that says there is no aether. It is for this reason that this experiment is completely ignored by scientists. More recently Kantor has found the same result with similar apparatus. All these experiments are never taught at universities, so consequently, scientists, including most Christian creationists, are ignorant of this evidence for geocentricity. aplanetruth.info |
||
|
Listen to the astounding answer given to him by a Christian. Begin watching the video at the 6:20 mark, please. youtu.be |
