|
|
| ||||||||||||
| From | Message | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
dmaestro 08-Sep-25, 06:48 |
 PatzWhere this is headed is easy to see. The fact is under our undemocratic system the right has the raw power in a majority of the states and will slowly crush dissent. www.msn.com. Nationally they intent to turn the federal govemment into a national enforcement arm. www.dailykos.com Pushing their anti-science medical view www.politico.com s is part of that Now that their holy grail faith in capitalism and the plutocracy is challenged 46% of the population news.gallup.com as rhe reallrh fhat capitalism leads to greater inequity and plutocracy is more and more evident we can expect open repression, attacks on education, McCarthyist demonization, and official misinformation to surge. Even as they claim they are the defenders of “liberty”’ It’s all scripted and sadly fated. Good luck. |
|||||||||||
|
"Birds Of A Feather" Rather than discuss the very real issues with the conflict of interest and false medical science which has built the American Health Department through duplicity between Big Pharma's profit driven agenda instead of meaningful and effective medical practices, he jumps in pointing fingers at the Progressive Socialists political policies designed to undermine the American Republic's robust support for Capitalism! |
|||||||||||
|
More actual 'facts' the progs know but doggedly refuse to admit or acknowledge the truth. They choose instead to publicly rail against it in pursuit of politically dismissing and belittling what they don't like. cough DM cough. I could go down the list item by item sharing truth but don't care to. You're on your own, good luck with that. |
|||||||||||
|
Refreshingly amazing, thank you by the way, that YouTube allowed that video. 'Truthful news and opinions' are in such short supply these days, has anyone noticed? |
|||||||||||
|
Thanks Thumper, I think everything is becoming crystal clear now. |
|||||||||||
|
Apatzer <Nobel awards are political The Nobel Peace Prize, in particular, has been a subject of political controversy and criticism. Many laureates have been contemporary and highly controversial political actors, and the Prizes have often increased public focus on international or national conflicts. The Norwegian Nobel Committee has faced criticism for its selection process and the way its members are chosen. The award has been seen by local authorities as "interference" in national matters, and there have been strong criticisms against the committee itself. NobelPrize.org The award's politicization is evident in several controversial decisions, such as Barack Obama's award in 2009, which was criticized for being premature and for signaling geopolitical approval. Muhammad Yunus's award in 2006 for pioneering microcredit was also controversial due to its perceived role in perpetuating systemic inequalities in Bangladesh. CNBC The Nobel Peace Prize has become more about geopolitics than about peace, with awards often used to send geopolitical messages. Awards to figures like Aung San Suu Kyi and Liu Xiaobo signaled support for anti-regime movements, while the joint prize to a Pakistani Muslim and an Indian Hindu in 2014 aimed to bridge regional divides. CNBC> |
|||||||||||
|
youtu.be (4:50) |
|||||||||||
|
RFK Jr Standing His Ground! youtu.be (9:50) |
|||||||||||
|
Thumper I'm not wasting any more of my time on people who either don't read or don't comprehend, sorry. fac ut facis |
|||||||||||
|
Thumper BTW One day the delusion will be lifted, it's already too late. The die is cast. |
|||||||||||
|
Stupid Is As Stupid Does . . . The report found that approximately 16% of killings arose from officers attempting to arrest a wanted person, execute a warrant, or apprehend a fugitive, and another 14% followed an attempted traffic or street stop, both scenarios often involving non-compliance. Furthermore, 160 people were accused of refusing commands to drop a weapon, highlighting that non-compliance was a common factor in these encounters. While the term "unarmed" indicates the individual did not have a firearm, it does not imply innocence or that the person was not a threat; the context of the situation, including resistance or failure to obey orders, often contributed to the use of lethal force "‘Unarmed Black Man’ doesn’t mean what you think it means" www.poynter.org |
|||||||||||
|
Apatzer To your credit I'm well aware of what you've personally said here concerning Obama's gift of a Nobel as well as Obama's comments about receiving it. I'm also aware that my thoughts and thought processes are different than the avg. That's what made me a superior and oft sought out inspector/investigator. I'm sorry you can't follow my train of thought about the politics involved with the Nobel selection committee. Obama himself was embarrassed for being given the undeserved 'honor' but most if not all of the lefties weren't/aren't. It's their 'truth'. My main point here is that such undeserved accolades are part and parcel with the progs' political agenda, program and mindset. Actual 'facts' be damned in the pursuit of advancing their agenda. The list of glaring examples is quite long. |
|||||||||||
|
Softaire can neither deny or affirm that what Apatzer is now saying that he previous said. Softaire often times has troubles remembering yesterday. He promised his wife that he would retire and stop driving to work when he couldn't remember how to get home after work. Fortunately he was able to retire before that happened, but you can see that if I have trouble remembering what I said yesterday, I can't confirm what Apatzer says he said years ago. "'Unarmed Black Man’ doesn’t mean what you think it means" I DO remember discussion about this. The gist of those arguments, by Liberals, were that White Police were basically slaughtering innocent unarmed Black men at night. While this has been shown to occur on occasion, the preponderance of evidence shows quite the opposite: Most police violence occurs when Black men are questioned for legitimate reasons and refuse to comply with legal, legitimate commands. Many of the famous incidents occurred during the day and "normal" hours. From those beginnings, violence happens, a chase begins, weapons are produced, and police are resisted and assaulted. It seems to me that when you are stopped, questioned, and told to do something that the police have authority to command, it would be smart to comply with the request civilly. The outcome from doing that is much better than the outcome from resisting, confronting, abusing, and insulting someone who can kick your ass. |
|||||||||||
|
Softaire That said, there have been studies on target acquisition and response time, and the findings are telling: even Black police officers, along with other law enforcement personnel, tend to react more quickly with lethal force when a Black male is involved. This isn’t necessarily because of conscious racism but rather due to deep-seated psychological and subconscious biases that cause the brain to register Black men as a greater threat. Now, that doesn’t mean racism isn’t a factor in some cases. There are indeed racist individuals, bullies, and even psychopaths who find a niche within law enforcement. Historically, organizations like the KKK were heavily involved in infiltrating police forces—a reality that persisted for over a century. While that influence has decreased, it has not disappeared entirely. At the same time, police officers today are often placed in impossible situations. They’re expected to act as counselors, mental health evaluators, and domestic peacekeepers, all while receiving relatively low pay. Still, accountability within law enforcement must come from within as well, and unfortunately, holding one another to those standards continues to be a major challenge. |
|||||||||||
|
Thumper If you had an extreme emergency and had to travel out of country over a weekend. The only problem is you have absolutely no one to watch your 14 year old grand daughter. Because everyone is out of town. For this thought experiment (for the sake of argument) You have two choices for a baby sitter over a weekend. Obama or Trump. Which one would you honestly pick? |
|||||||||||
|
I'll ask A.I Question, "if I needed a babysitter for an over the weekend event. For my 14 year old grand daughter. and I only had two candidates to watch her over an entire weekend. and I did a complete and through background check of these two candidates. and the candidates were Barrack Obama or Donald Trump. which candidate would be the wisest choice?" Answer Given the choice between Barack Obama and Donald Trump as babysitters for a 14-year-old granddaughter over an entire weekend, considering a thorough background check with the context of character, temperament, and public behaviors: Barack Obama is widely known for a calm, empathetic, and responsible demeanor. His leadership style reflects inspiration, care, and steady management during challenging situations. Surveys historically showed many people preferred Obama in caring or responsible roles, reflecting a perception of reliability and a respectful approach . Donald Trump's background includes a more assertive, dominant, and sometimes controversial style. Public perception and some political commentary suggest he has a highly controlling and confrontational personality, with a focus on ambition and power, which might be less suited to the patient, nurturing role a babysitter requires. Some public comments have suggested reservations about trusting him in caregiving roles . There are recent viral moments showing Trump in informal babysitting roles (e.g., Elon Musk’s young son), but these were noted as unusual and sparked mixed reactions rather than demonstrating sustained caregiving capabilities . In summary, the wisest choice for a babysitter role for a 14-year-old granddaughter, based on character, temperament, and public trust in nurturing responsibility, would be Barack Obama as the safer and more reliable candidate. This conclusion is based on his historically perceived empathy, steadiness, and responsible demeanor over Trump's more controversial and aggressive leadership style . What a dumb AI, it didn't even evaluate Trumps sexual assaults or barging into dressing rooms of teen pageant members, and no mention of Epstein. And It still picked Obama lol wow, just wow |
|||||||||||
|
Softie I was pulled over last year for not having my seat-belt on and having a cracked windshield. While I was talking with the Officer through my completely rolled down driver side window the Officer directed me to exit the vehicle. I responded that "You smell the alcohol on my breath". Yes, he responded. He asked how much I had been drinking and I admitted that I had taken a couple shots of whiskey about a half hour ago to help manage pain. He obviously concluded that I was BSing him so gave me a field sobriety test apparently expecting me to fail. I passed. He then gave me a breathalyzer test which I also passed. I blew a .01%. He wasn't an ass, just doing his job. We ended up chatting good naturedly for a while and I got no ticket for the infractions; Just a 'fix it' verbal and a pleasant 'Have a good day Doug'. We were now on a first name basis. If I had came at him with an aggressive profane and belligerent attitude like some do, things would have turned out very much differently. I simply treated him with the same respect and courtesy I expect from others and got that same respect in return. I actually made a new friend that day. Note: I got the windshield replaces 2 weeks later but still don't wear my seatbelt. |
|||||||||||
|
Thumper |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Apatzer Neither. Who watches over my grandkids in that situation would be their parent's decision, not mine. I see you trying to set up and perpetrate a pedophile angle. I don't know either of them but if it were my decision I would say Trump. He would just hire a babysitting service like 'Super Nanny'. Truth be told my granddaughter could literally kick both their asses if necessary though in a pinch she would only have to give a command to the trained family pet; A very athletic 100# pitbull. |
|||||||||||
|
Thumper |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Apatzer |
|||||||||||
|
Thumper |
|||||||||||
|
Thumper I'll wait |
|||||||||||
|
He makes people take their masks off. And he drags them through the mud with him. There isn't a bottom to it either. |
|||||||||||
|
Apatzer You asked the question the only way you could. <Would you like to know what I really do admire about Trump.?> No, not really. I understand you hate Trump. OK with me, my life is unchanged. I neither like or dislike him. We've never met. As POTUS he has made decisions I agree with and he has made some that I disagree with. I don't get twisted up about it. |
|||||||||||
|
Thumper You all don't care about prices, gas , the constitution, the military, as long as you think he is punishing the object of your Contempt. Heck Joe Biden sniffed hair and you all were all over him for it. As was I. And roughly so, Because it was creepy. Trump literally has a ln allegation of Child rape, was best friends with the most prolific pedophile this nation is probably ever seen. And somehow I shouldn't mention any of that should I oh no. Oh , I just hate Trump... Yeah for absolutely no reason because I am so unreasonable. This is only the beginning. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
