|
|
| From | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
 Gravitons Freeman Dyson calculated that a machine the size of Earth would be required to detect up to four gravitons from our sun over the course of five billion years. Gravity is just that weak. www.quantamagazine.org |
||
|
Shiva |
||
|
Mo Two There are thousands of GIGANIC phenomenon that are over a thousand light years in diameter in the Universe which are about 13.4 billion years old that science calls cosmic voids which, thanks to the James Webb telescope, were just recently discovered --- And guess what's actually in these cosmic voids --- You guessed it: Neutrinos ---they are another one of those massless elementaries, science says. And guess what: It is thought that these neutrinos might have solves one of the great mystries that we know as something like that sudden loss of neutrons that occurred about 300,000,000 million years after the BB. That's why they're called neutrinos --- they (don't recall how) seem to be what's left of those neutrons after some sort of action --- Neutrinos are the most abundant particle in the universe Science no says (see dark matter etc.) Wait a minute! I thought y'all was talking about Neutrinos, not gravitons, Shiva. Oh well |
||
|
One |
||
|
Gravitons I have been to LIGO a number of times. Each arm is 2.5 miles long. But they bounce the beam down each arm 400 times, making an effective length of one thousand miles. Axions likely outnumber neutrinos, but are not electromagnetic. |
||
|
Mo Two Not according to the article I read about 6-months ago, Brother. One can surmise that if neutrinos somehow absorbed, replaced or ate, etc. All the thermal dynamic law REQUIRED negatrons that mysteriously disappeared about 13.6 billion years ago, those cute little neutrinos would equal the sum of ALL positrons in our "positive" universe, and that's big numbers. And guess what: Those neutrinos have flavors, etc. |
||
|
A hypotheses of mine. For the formation of dark matter in the very early Universe is. When matter and Anti Matter became cool enough to coalesce. And started annihilating each other. It wasn't a total annihilation but more like a fusion with the particle that was left from the two being a dark matter particle with a massive release of energy. I don't think that the concept of total annihilation is correct at all. |
||
|
Axions vs. Neutrinos “Based on current understanding, there are likely significantly more neutrinos than axions in the universe, with neutrinos being considered one of the most abundant particles, while axions, if they exist, are theorized as a dark matter candidate and their exact abundance is still unknown and highly dependent on their mass and properties.” IF axions exist, they are fairly massive, and their total mass must exceed the mass of neutrinos by orders of magnitude, given neutrinos are a fraction of electromagnetic mass, which in turn is roughly 20% of dark matter mass. Dark matter may be composed of more than just axions. We will know more when we determine whether these even exist in the first place. Huh? I am wrong again, and now deeply confused, according to the AI. If axions exist, they are only a tiny component of DM. Go figure! “According to current theories, the mass of an axion is generally considered to be significantly smaller than the mass of a neutrino, with axions potentially having a mass many orders of magnitude lower, typically estimated around 10^-6 eV or less, while neutrinos have a mass that is still very small but larger than that of an axion, with current estimations placing it below 1 eV.“ So far fewer in number, and roughly a millionth of the total mass. Conclusion: Axions comprise less than 0.000002% of the overall mass of dark matter. Astonishing! Now I will consult the AI and it will again tell me I am wrong, further confounding me. |
||
|
Ha Ha! AI returns: The mass ratio of axions to neutrinos in the universe is currently unknown and highly uncertain, but based on current theoretical estimates, it is likely to be extremely small due to the fact that neutrinos are considered to be one of the lightest known particles, while the mass of an axion is also predicted to be very small, though potentially within a different mass range depending on the specific axion model; meaning the ratio could be anywhere from significantly less than 1 to potentially much larger depending on the actual axion mass. I don’t know how it could possibly be larger than 1 given the previous information. |
||
|
Mo Two Not quite Paul, but I'm too busy crowing about my success with pea sooz to argue the matter. And what do you mean when you say "consult the AI"? Talking to Andy Boyd? And further: The really huge advancements in neutrino understanding came from the Webb telescope Before the Web, science thought there might be a couple dozen of those cosmic voids close-in. Now we know that there are many thousands of them that are way out there ( see a couple 100 million years after the big bang, the mysterious loss of anti matter that allowed our universe to exist and my earlier comments on the matter for reference). |
||
|
For those those who don't know www.technologyreview.com |
||
|
Typo discovery My "The really huge advancements in neutrino understanding came from the Webb telescope" sentence needs to have a period (see . ) at the end. |
||
|
AI On further research, I guess Google’s search bar may use Gemini, which they developed along with other AI tools. ChatGPT is the product of OpenAI, an unrelated group. |
||
|
Two I haven't worked with AI since my work at AT&T and that was brief ---nothing like what's available today. It was Lisp --- a rather limited AI software that may be more capable today due to huge advancements in Integrated circuitry miniaturization. I like to call it The age of Miniaturization. en.wikipedia.org) |
