|
|
| |||||||
| From | Message | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
 Virginian Governor Starting Second American Civil WarEvidently the state's governor and the state's general assembly have been passing legislation which are taking aim at eliminating the Second Amendment rights to own and to bear arms. This video is by a resident of Virginia which explains the disastrous results of what these Anti Second Amendment laws would mean to not only Virginia, but to rest of America as well! He explains that the Virginia governor is touting these laws as crime and safety laws, but they are quite other! Interviews and first person statements by people who live in Virginia indicate that this is actually taking place. Sheriffs are going on record saying they will not enforce these laws because they are sworn to uphold the American Constitution. In response, the Virginian governor has said that if these sheriffs do not enforce these laws they will lose their jobs and their pensions. This is a serious national crisis in the making! youtu.be "Gun Rights Groups Hit Back After VA AG Says Second Amendment Sanctuaries Have 'No Legal Effect'" townhall.com "86 of VA's 95 counties declare themselves 2nd Amendment sanctuaries" americanmilitarynews.com "In Virginia, and elsewhere, gun supporters prepare to defy new laws" www.msn.com Personally, I believe this latest development is a direct result of the American Democratic Party's inability to never having accepted their 2016 presidential loss to Donald Trump. Their failure to tie him to election interference (Russian Collusion) and their obvious failure to impeach the president! These are perilous time to be a freedom loving American in this country IMO. "VA Dems Calling Second Amendment Sanctuaries Civil War Flashpoints" www.ammoland.com |
||||||
|
What is this crap??? The 2nd Amendment was not intended to protect the people from a so-called and non existent tyrant US Government --- it was intended to provide a "well organized militia" to help protect the United States of America ("the states") against invading forces from beyond our territories. The proposed Virginia law, which has not yet been argued, revised or voted on, is a creative, possibly a bit excessive proposal to limit gun types in Virginia --- it has nothing to do with "taking your precious guns away" which some apparently love so dearly, but it IS designed to help protect the innocent from gun violence. Your other 4 links are similarly outrageous. Are these the types of links that you want to fill your club posts with, IHS, or was your intent to have a club that had free speech among the members without your usual vast count of debaucherously alt-right wing tip, lying, "newsey" links? Is this club gonna be another "business as usual" club for you to espouse your radical links --- yes-no-maybe? |
||||||
|
@Mo-one What is this crap??? >> While you are free to express your opposition to the premises expressed by Steve Huff, this club will not abide by using disparaging innuendos like "BS" or "crap". Yes, we are all grown up and no doubt have heard this kind of descriptive euphemisms for what normally are swear words. As I am endeavoring to build a better club with higher standards than are normally allowed you will have to get used to calming your emotions before "speaking" in this club. Enough said. Addressing the specific ISSUE here, now, let me say that this issue of limiting the Second Amendment is something which the Democratic Party has historically tried to do. News reports all around the Internet are reporting basically the same thing my articles reported. Namely that a Democratic Governor in Virginia is pushing legislation to limit the use, sales and even instruction in how to use, firearms. He is doing this - as you indicated - as a measure to "protect citizens and curb criminal use of firearms". Do you disagree with this particular statement? Please, explain why if you do, okay? << The 2nd Amendment was not intended to protect the people from a so-called and non existent tyrant US Government --- it was intended to provide a "well organized militia" to help protect the United States of America ("the states") against invading forces from beyond our territories. >> You are perfectly within your rights to say that this is your interpretation of the Second Amendment. However, as I read the Second Amendment I read: "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." constitutioncenter.org True, it is intended for a "well organized militia", it says nothing about protecting "against invading forces beyond our territories". << The proposed Virginia law, which has not yet been argued, revised or voted on, is a creative, possibly a bit excessive proposal to limit gun types in Virginia --- it has nothing to do with "taking your precious guns away" which some apparently love so dearly, but it IS designed to help protect the innocent from gun violence. >> Democrats and other Leftist always use this rationale, but it never does protect the innocent. Statistics prove this time and time again. "Here Are 8 Stubborn Facts on Gun Violence in America" www.heritage.org "ANOTHER REMINDER: GUN CONTROL DOESN'T PREVENT CRIME" www.nssf.org "Fact Sheet: Gun Violence" www.heritage.org |
||||||
|
Ihs “Limiting the second has been something the dems have been trying to do” Well of course. Even you will admit the second has limits, right? Tanks, nukes, mustard gas, etc? Agreed? So arguing where said limits exist is logical and topical, right? Anyone arguing there are no limits to the second surely can be called an extremist. “Namely that a Democratic Governor in Virginia is pushing legislation to limit the use, sales and even instruction in how to use, firearms.” Just like they regulate motor vehicles? Outrageous! |
||||||
|
Well no, not exactly, but it does say "for the protection of a free STATE", and we had just finished a war with England, and the "Militia" had had a strong hand in our winning the Revolutionary war. And we didn't have our (hopefully the last) Civil War until 100 years later. |
||||||
|
2nd amendment and civil war ! I seldom heard such an absurd reasonnement. The US constitution has been written 250 years ago. Shall I remember you that the world has changed since this time - first of all, the type of weapons available. If weapon's possession without limit is good for everybody (and prevents civil war ), I suggest to sell rockets and missiles in supermarkets ! |
||||||
|
Make up the vast majority of the people who live in the state of Virginia. This governor and the small minority of the state assembly are making a number of changes to the existing laws which the rest of the people in Virginia do not want. If these laws are passed, that could automatically make many citizens of the stste of Virginia criminals, though they have done nothing wrong! The law enforcement now in Virginia said that they would not enforce these new laws. Why? They're Unconstitutional. If this governor calls in the National Guard as he said he would do I doubt very much that Americans would shoot other Americans! This governor and the gun hating Democrats who passed these laws are not going to win this thing Guarantee it! |
||||||
|
Possibly A Related Subject/ Issue? Please, my only concern in posting these news stories is to bring to your notice news and information which may purposely be unpublished to the general public. "Why is the United Nations hiring a military disarmament officer for New York?" Did you know that the United Nations (UN) has a Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Resource Centre? According to the Center’s website: (1) (1). www.unddr.org fellowshipoftheminds.com "U.N. Seeking ‘Disarmament’ Officers to Work in U.S." The United Nations is looking for ‘Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration’ officers to work out of its New York City office. www.gunpowdermagazine.com "U.N. hiring: Disarmament, Demobilization and reintegration officer - New York" Why is the UN hiring people in America to take away guns? Why are they allowed to hire ANYone here? UN Jobs (1) (1). www.unjobnet.org www.tigerdroppings.com Seems more than a little suspecious to me! |
||||||
|
disarmament The USA have more private weapons than any other natio in the word but also more murders, more mass shooting, more serial killers. You believe it has nothing to do, it's just a coincidence. In fact, I do not really care if the USA are full of armed people but when there is a murder or mass shooting or so, I cannot help to think that they have what they deserve ! "Who takes a sword shall perish by sword !" |
||||||
|
The Federal Government which has a very lucritive (Monetarily Profitable) relationship with Big Pharma (Primary Supplier Of Psychiatric Drugs and Vaccines) to the American people may also have a Conflict of Interest between that lucritive relationship and with protecting American citizens. Until the arrival of President Trump the Democratic Party's push for restricting, and eventually eliminating the Second Amendment was much in the news. Ptetroque's statement here could possibly be how these Democrats feel about Americans who are trying to keep our Second Amendment. The reason why America will never willingly give up on the Second Amendment was poingnantly illustrated in a Texas church last Sunday morning. After an armed man came into this church last Sunday he opened fire with a shot gun killing people at point blank range. Immediately, two armed members of the church sprang up and shot back at this assailant, killing him. No others were hurt. As long as we live in a society where the governing authorities can not protect us from someone else with a firearm, we demand that the laws say we can protect ourselves, that these laws stay in place. |
||||||
|
@ Inhis In Britain, there was a time (30 years ago or sp) when the policemen refused to carry guns, for they said : "if we have guns, the trespassers will arm themselves and we will be more unsafe." |
||||||
|
@Ptitreoque Someday, maybe America, too, will be a safe haven from firearms. Someday. However, any, and I emphasize, any attempt to take them forcibly - that would be disasterous. |
||||||
|
Virginia increases corrections budget in anticipation of jailing gun owners Virginia Gov. Northam has increased the state's corrections budget by $250,000 as he eyes gun bans. A battle over gun control in Virginia with national implications is heating up as the legislature prepares to vote on sweeping new restrictions and localities band together to defy them in growing numbers. Virginians turned out to debate the measures and other issues at public budget hearings on Thursday, less than a week before the General Assembly's first legislative session of 2020. Both the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL) and Gun Owners of America specifically warned about Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam's related budget proposal, which directs $250,000 for the Department of Corrections to incarcerate people as a result of new restrictions. MORE THAN 100 VIRGINIA CITIES, COUNTIES DECLARE THEMSELVES GUN SANCTUARIES AS DEMS PREPARE TO TAKE LEGISLATURE www.foxnews.com |
||||||
|
Bloodshed Unnecessary It does unless you are going to do like the Democratic Party who is trying to Impeach the president. But in President Trump's case regardless what the House Democrats think, the will of the majority of Americans thrump's that! |
||||||
|
More silliness |
||||||
|
Leftist Disarmament Is Not Nonsense I don't have any firearms which this Democratic governor of Virginia may be having designs to restrict and, or confiscate. You seem to be missing the larger point here. A small minority ( the Democrats of Virginia ) are passing laws which the majority ( Second Amendment supporting Virginians ) don't want to abide by. The governor is Ignoring that dynamic. How far does he intend to take this madness? |
||||||
|
Second Amendment Sanctuary Cities Are Spreading "Second Amendment ‘sanctuaries’ spreading with aim to defy new gun control laws" usafeatures.news ""Second Amendment Sanctuary" counties are spreading like wildfire. Ground Zero is Texas." www.lawenforcementtoday.com |
||||||
|
Ralph Northam . . . He has managed to declare that it will be Illegal to be in possession of any firearm at the intended pro Second Amendment rally at the capital on Monday. This "immovable rock meets irresistible force" scenario which is quickly approaching in Virginia has all of the earmarks of what transpired in Charlottesville a few ago! The Democratic Party is bound and determined to test the determination of the American patriots, apparently. Sheriffs throughout Virginia and other places are already declaring their intentions of upholding the Constitution rather than enforce these Unconstitutional laws! Let us pray for safety and a peaceful rally in Virginia next Monday. youtu.be |
||||||
|
Seen from abroad... - death penalty in most parts of the country. - weapons (including automatic riffles !) sold to ordinary citizens with very low or no control - one half of the private weaponry in the world in the hands of US citizens (5% of the global planet population) - very Little protection for the workers if you're fired by your boss (social violence) - almost no welfare - plenty of mass murders and serial killers. - many people considering that official assassination of an executive of a foreign country in another country is legitimate - an army more powerful than Russia+ China+England+France+ Italy. - the most violent movies in the world are the Hollywood ones. Don't you see that all those societal facts are bound, coherent and logical ? Violence induces violence ( it's in the scriptures !) - Furthermore, it increases paranoiac tendencies. All of that is very coherent. So, whatever happens during the demonstration, whatever happens to the US troops in any country in the world... You get what you deserve... as a whole, for I pity the people who are killed or wounded, whether American or not. Sorry, I'm drunk tonight and I'm probably to direct . |
||||||
|
Ptit |
||||||
|
iHs |
||||||
|
Brother, you don't know the half of it! Did you know that the UN is recruiting "Disarmament Police"? I kid you not. Look it up. The Democratic Party is DESPARATE. They don't have a snoball's chance in you know where this November. I don't know what they are liable to do! Its going to be interesting, I will tell you that. |
||||||
|
The stage for a False Flag event is in place! In spite of the fact that Virginia is an "open carry" state, Northam has declared that no firearms will be allowed in the rally. The rally area is a fenced area, with the few entrances. Obviously, they're going to stage something which will ensure that people are shot. This will be the rationale for ending the Second Amendment. youtu.be "BREAKING: Democrats conspiring to stage false flag bloodshed on Jan. 20th in Virginia – “Charlottesville 2.0” in attempt to ignite a civil war and mass chaos" The stage is being set by Democrats and the complicit left-wing media (CNN) to turn Jan. 20th “Lobby Day” in Richmond, Virginia into a false flag bloodbath that will attempt to frame gun owners as terrorists and provide the justification for state-wide martial law and the confiscation of all firearms from citizens. magamedia.org |
||||||
|
Let me know |
||||||
|
So |
||||||
|
pawntificator 20-Jan-20, 17:10 |
|
||||||
|
pawntificator 20-Jan-20, 17:15 |
|
||||||
|
zorroloco 21-Jan-20, 05:53 |
Deleted by zorroloco on 21-Jan-20, 07:19.
|
||||||
|
zorroloco 21-Jan-20, 05:59 |
Deleted by zorroloco on 21-Jan-20, 07:19.
|
||||||
|
Sorry |
||||||
| |||||||
