| ||||||||
| From | Message | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
chess theory position 001In the French defense... I have won many exciting games by playing as white 1.e4.e6.2.b3! move 2. takes the typical French player out of the books and takes many players out of their comfort zone where fear lives. The normal response by black is 2.d5 now white plays 3.bb2..after 3.d5xe4 white plays 4.nc3 the only good response is nf6..f5 is unsound and now 5.qe2 is best...look at this position. Black's French game looks different from anything normal. White will win back the pawn on e4 and castle long with a good game.I sat at a table during a large tournament with 4 masters in San Diego in 2015 showing this opening...one of the masters said he had never see an opening like this! In the book of proverbs it is said that a surprised man is half beaten. I find this opening sound and offering great chances for white especially in over the board play. Test this for yourself. Don't take my word for it. Comments are necessary for growth and welcome. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
brigadecommander 11-Nov-20, 11:59 |
Deleted by brigadecommander on 11-Nov-20, 12:51.
|
|||||||
|
Dom |
|||||||
|
When you're talking among yourselves and bouncing move sequences back and forth: 1. e4 e6 2. b3 d5 3. Bb2 dxe4 4. Nc3 Nf6; Berlin Defense against the Ruy Lopez; French, Reti (Spielmann) variation, etc... You're talking a language you all understand well but the average player just glazes over reading it. It would be nice if one of you would from time to time break down into layman's terms, the 'reason'. |
|||||||
|
my bad thump |
|||||||
|
Opening theoryControl the center, activate pieces, castle, try not to fall into a basic trap |
|||||||
|
brigade |
|||||||
|
The French defence1.e4 e6 Black's idea with this defence is to challenge the centre by playing d5 and challenging to challenge the pawn on e4 2. d4 - white takes advantage of being able to put both pawns in the centre, d5 black responds and challenges the e4-pawn. At this point white has a few main options 3.e5 - to take a slight space advantage. Black generally attacks on the queenside and white attacks on the kingside. The black bishop on c8 traditionally struggles to get into the game. 3. exd5 - white exchanges and after ...exd5 it's a fairly symmetric position. 3. Nc3 - white tries to defend the e4 pawn though black has the opportunity to play 3...Bb4 in order to pin the knight so that it no longer defends e4 3. Nd2 - white tries to defend the e4-pawn. Now 3..Bb4 can be met with 4.c3 Dominick's idea is to avoid a lot of this theory by playing 2. b3 instead to get out of theory and try to get an interesting position which will be less known to the opponent. |
|||||||
|
ThumperWhite wants to take control of e4 by occupation with a knight or by control...g3 and bg2. In some lines White can play a very dangerous gambit with g4..playing for for g5 to disrupt the black knight on f6. After white plays o-o-o he can then play d4 at some point to take central space. The white queen is placed well on e2 as she can move to either side quickly. This is by no means won but white has a good game and black must play a position unfamiliar in most cases. |
|||||||
|
chess theory 002 ruy lopez quiet variation1.e4.e5.2.nf3.nc6.3.bb5.a6 4.ba4.nf6 most modern games continue with 5.o-o. Playing 5.o-o allows lots of heavy analysis after Nxe4. This also allows the dangerous Marshall gambit. In the early 1980's Karpov started playing 5.d3! Many grandmasters said that since the goal for white is to get d4 in, d3 was a loss of tempo as now it takes 2 moves to play d4 instead of one. I disagree because this is a closed position. Tempo loss means nothing in a closed game. In an open game the loss of one tempo can prove fatal but in this case the move 5.d3 has a deeper meaning. The idea is to get all the pieces developed before playing d4 so that the breaking move with have a greater effect. This quiet move also side steps many prepared lines. As an example. typical play from here follow like this.. 5...d6 6.c3.g6 7.o-o.bg7. 8.re1. o-o 9.b1-d2...after the normal ...b5 10.bc2 is best. In many games I have played the knight on d2 to f1 and g3 giving white fair chances for a kingside attack. Comments ? |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
The opening usually turnes into the... Ruy López Opening: Morphy Defense, Breyer, Quiet Variation |
|||||||
|
the point of opening theory |
|||||||
|
i think |
|||||||
|
brigade |
|||||||
|
To give people and idea |
|||||||
|
chess theory position 003 fighting against the caro kann I again have a pet line that can easily take the unprepared second player into deep waters. After 1.e4.c6 I break right away with 2.c4...after d5.3.c4xd5. c6xd5. 4.e4xd5 ...taking back with qxd5 is not correct...best is 4...nf6 This is where I break the rules..5.qa4+ now beginners are told to not come out early with the queen and that is good advice but at master level, analysis betters rigid theory. Many ways for black to go wrong now...the instinctive 5..bd7 is very bad as 6.qb3.qc7.7.nc3.a6 8.d4 and white is clearly better. so best for black is b8-d7.6.nc3.g6 7.nf3.bg7. 8.bc4.o-o 9.d3. a6 10.qa3. The idea here is not to attempt to hold on to the extra pawn..the goal is to give black a cramped game and achieve a better position because of the temporary space advantage from the pawn on d5. this is almost the set position...the goal for white is to castle kingside, play be3 and double the rooks on the e file.. comments? |
|||||||
|
brigadeVery impressive chess as an art form. Not perfect but perfection is only a concept. |
|||||||
|
i like that... |
|||||||
|
My 1st decade of tournament chesssmith morra, benko, evans, and even the king's gambit.. From my 20's to 30's it was no guts no glory but I did learn the importance of being up tempo and down material...it helped me develop a killer instinct. As we age we take less chances and tend to play safer, sound positions. My first 20 years of over the board play with black against 1.e4 had me always playing 1.nf6. I preferred hypermodern theory to classical and in many cases I still do. |
|||||||
|
Tal,Morphy,Bronstein,and others. But i liked Nimzowitsch, Capablanca,Peterosian,Tarrash and to lesser degree, Alekhine.(he beat Capablanca Positionally) I was more inclined to positional chess. Tal was too wild for me. There is an enormous difference in OTB vs Correspondence. I am not a Natural player. I had to study very hard .It did not come easy. Having up to 5-days per move helps a lot!!! Gives me more time to calculate until i find a better move. |
|||||||
|
thumper 11-Nov-20, 15:46 |
Deleted by thumper on 11-Nov-20, 15:47.
|
|||||||
|
Dom |
|||||||
|
Tempo |
|||||||
|
thumper..and example of tempo for material1.e4.c5 2.d4.c5xd4 3.c3.d4xc3 4.nc3.. What exactly does white have for the gambit? White has a center pawn and a knight developed.. white has an open c file and a semi open d file. Having a lead in development means that you have a better chance of getting the first attack Doug. In all fairness, tempo is harder to explain than a material advantage.. You can see the extra pawn but tempo is an advantage in time...not something you can hold in your hand and see.. |
|||||||
|
the danish gambit 1.e4.e5 2.d4.e5xd4.3.c3.d4xc3.4.bc4.c3xb2.5.bxb2..this is an extreme example of time for material. Doug the bishops are aiming in the right direction. Black must be very careful and give back the pawns to achieve an equal position.. Understanding the concept of time for material gives you the ability to crush lower rated players. |
|||||||
|
thumperMy game with bobby dudly was a smith morra gambit... Look how well placed all my army was after 12 moves...all this for a pawn...? |
|||||||
|
stalhandske 11-Nov-20, 21:32 |
DomHave I missed something? Where is this thread? |
|||||||
|
stal...I posted 10 games |
|||||||
| ||||||||