GameKnot: club forum - What Evolutionists Refuse To Address

Play online chess!

What Evolutionists Refuse To Address

From	Message
coram_deo 23-Jul-21, 06:52	What Evolutionists Refuse To Address Yep, evolutionists on GK are in attack mode - because they can’t address flaws with Darwin’s garbage theory, they’re falling back on insults, mockery, misrepresentations and flat-out lies. As the Preacher said in Ecclesiastes, “There is no new thing under the sun.” (Ecclesiastes 1:9) In this thread, I’ll be keeping a list of all the problems with the theory of evolution that GK evolutionists don’t want to debate or discuss. Here are the first entries: 1) Critics of the theory of evolution say evolution has never been shown to add new information to the gene pool. Can you cite an experiment which proves it has? 2) Cite an example, in the fossil record or in real time, of one species evolving into an entirely separate species after first defining the word “species” and stating whether that definition has changed over the last five decades. 3) Darwin said the number of “intermediate varieties” (transitional forms) must be “truly enormous” if his theory is true. State the percentage of fossils that have been found that represent “intermediate varieties.” 4) How do you explain “orphan genes,” which are said to make up 10 percent to 30 percent of all genes in a genome? (See Part 3 in the thread, “Why Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is Garbage.”) This list will undoubtedly grow as time goes on. If GK evolutionists ever decide to address these points with substance, please start a new thread and save the thread you created to attack me and this club for its original purpose. Have a great day!

From

Message

coram_deo
23-Jul-21, 06:52

What Evolutionists Refuse To Address

Yep, evolutionists on GK are in attack mode - because they can’t address flaws with Darwin’s garbage theory, they’re falling back on insults, mockery, misrepresentations and flat-out lies.

As the Preacher said in Ecclesiastes, “There is no new thing under the sun.” (Ecclesiastes 1:9)

In this thread, I’ll be keeping a list of all the problems with the theory of evolution that GK evolutionists don’t want to debate or discuss. Here are the first entries:

1) Critics of the theory of evolution say evolution has never been shown to add new information to the gene pool. Can you cite an experiment which proves it has?

2) Cite an example, in the fossil record or in real time, of one species evolving into an entirely separate species after first defining the word “species” and stating whether that definition has changed over the last five decades.

3) Darwin said the number of “intermediate varieties” (transitional forms) must be “truly enormous” if his theory is true. State the percentage of fossils that have been found that represent “intermediate varieties.”

4) How do you explain “orphan genes,” which are said to make up 10 percent to 30 percent of all genes in a genome? (See Part 3 in the thread, “Why Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is Garbage.”)

This list will undoubtedly grow as time goes on.

If GK evolutionists ever decide to address these points with substance, please start a new thread and save the thread you created to attack me and this club for its original purpose.

Have a great day!

« Back to club forum

GameKnot: play chess online, free online chess games database, monthly chess tournaments, Internet chess league, chess teams, chess clubs, online chess puzzles and more.