| ||||||||||
From | Message | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
![]() "The basic strategic conflict revolves around the __________ ." Now fill in the blank. |
|||||||||
tigerblood 07-May-11, 22:04 |
![]() I imagine we should consider what degree of positional vs. tactical we should employ. Our "attack strategy" while standing vigilant to not weaken our "defense". And once past the mechanical elements of the endgame - the fun part - pure magic of intuition that just comes from the human spirit and says "that's the move". I do think he would find both the black team and our team fierce and worthy competitors - I definitely think that... With that in mind let's vote on a move! I'm still for the check. |
|||||||||
wildfiree 08-May-11, 02:55 |
![]() After careful analysis I think Qh7 is a good move, so that's what I will vote for. |
|||||||||
|
![]() And thank you, Ardin: and why do you prefer Qh7 to Qd6? |
|||||||||
wildfiree 08-May-11, 04:38 |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||
wildfiree 08-May-11, 05:05 |
![]() I think this position is hard/tough because it is now difficult to look for a winning plan. Kind of short, but that's how I feel about it now |
|||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||
tigerblood 13-May-11, 06:43 |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
![]() ![]() |
|||||||||
easy19 20-May-11, 14:36 |
![]() I see a nice game emerging from the French advance variation. White has a nice king attack going, and has some good room to move. My money is on white. but who should i join ? |
|||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||
easy19 20-May-11, 14:55 |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||
easy19 20-May-11, 15:10 |
![]() If...she...weighs the same as a duck......she's made of wood. and therefore... A Witch! |
|||||||||
tigerblood 21-May-11, 04:16 |
![]() |
|||||||||
easy19 21-May-11, 07:29 |
![]() So it is blacks move wen will there be moved ? |
|||||||||
tigerblood 21-May-11, 08:36 |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||
tigerblood 26-May-11, 15:58 |
![]() |
|||||||||
tigerblood 26-May-11, 15:59 |
![]() Shamash, you've done it again! Oui, oui for pushing the g. Attack!!! |
|||||||||
easy19 27-May-11, 07:54 |
![]() But i like to suggest a inferior move that is more suited to my zen style of play.. 33. Bd3 we would still be winning but what will our opponent make of it. the ball in there court.. |
|||||||||
easy19 27-May-11, 07:58 |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
![]() 33 Bd3 does look European, a downright Dutch-Russian-Italian idea: 1) am sure Euwe would have liked it, as it takes c4 away from Black's c-rook (or is that "crook"?), Euwe being a big proponent of taking away squares from an opponent's open rook file. 2) Karpov, too, that boa-constrictor-turned-grandmaster would approve: the application of his most important principle: Restraining the opponent Which leads to your. . . "what would the opponent make of it?" : 3) That we are playing like a cat toying with a mouse for the joy of slow torture. That, while g5 would be an application of force, Bd3 would be an expression of power. As Canetti puts it: “The distinction between force and power can be illustrated very simply by the relationship between cat and mouse. “The cat uses force to catch the mouse, to seize it, hold it in its claws and ultimately kill it. But while it is playing with it, another factor is present. It lets it go, allows it to run about a little and even turn its back; and during this time, the mouse is no longer subjected to force. “But it is still within the power of the cat and can be caught again. If it gets away, it escapes from the cat’s sphere of power,” says Canetti. “But, up to the point at which it can no longer be reached, it is still within it. The space which the cat dominates, the moments of hope it allows the mouse, while continuing however to watch it closely all the time and never relaxing its interest and intention to destroy it – all this together, space, hope, watchfulness and destructive intent, can be called the actual body of power, or, more simply, power itself.” |
|||||||||
tigerblood 27-May-11, 09:37 |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
![]() You don't ever let up. You do not allow counterplay. |
|||||||||
easy19 27-May-11, 10:23 |
![]() Zen in the Art of Chess is working well if you are just the stronger opponent. you are basically just play your own game and just ignores any of the moves and plans your opponent play,s or has. which often leads to in logical moves by your opponent who will respond to your moves. Against a high caliber player it only works in some cases but mostly the opponents moves are of such value that the zen way of play alone is not working |
|||||||||
shamash 27-May-11, 10:35 |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
![]() ![]() |
|||||||||
|