| ||||||||||||||||
From | Message | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
bigpeta 14-Nov-12, 04:04 |
![]() I am pleased that nobody suggested exd4 which would be bad for us. @kepplersteve the N is not a free piece. We have traded B for N & p so it is the pawn that we are up by. Just a word of caution in general. If a competent player offers an exchange advantage then be very careful to look at what they are getting for the material on offer. Usually they are looking for increased mobility and/or space. Such is the case with the offer of an early pawn in the gambit openings. In this case i dont think this applies but do bear it in mind for future games that you play. |
|||||||||||||||
kepplersteve 16-Nov-12, 08:06 |
![]() not get a chance to make it up. |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() That WN was taken without future loss, ("at that point".) |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 21-Nov-12, 01:56 |
![]() Latest moves 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.0-0 Nf6 5.d4 Bxd4 6.Nxd4 Nxd4 7.Be3 |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() are about to suffer a 6 point loss (N and Pawn). And we lose our grip on the d5 central control. Also the N will be additional support for our e5 pawn. In my opinion, d6 will be an alternative, after we 0-0 |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() True it is attacked by a Bishop and a Queen but can only be captured sensibly by the Bishop, capture by the Queen is out of the question period. To allow the capture by the Bishop isn't a bad trade for black. The only negative involve with this trade is giving up the pawn which will be capture by the Queen. If we are hungry and not worried about development, what about Nxp The danger is we are up against a higher rated player who has castled already. |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 22-Nov-12, 02:04 |
![]() So as stealth invader points out we would lose on the trade and give back the pawn that we just won. |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() My question is should we hold on to the pawn at all cost? or continue to develop our pieces and castle |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 22-Nov-12, 07:48 |
![]() Now 'dont move a piece many times in the opening' is a guideline and not a rule written in stone. you have to know these guidelines but the gateway to good chess is knowing when to ignore them. This is one of those times. We must save the N. |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 22-Nov-12, 10:44 |
![]() So a question for you - why would you not save the N? |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() for example, if it was free for the taking, you wouldn't pass on capturing your opponent's queen in order to castle. you'd capture a free rook, too. you'd probably even trade a knight for a rook. the point of any of these captures is to leave you in a better position than your opponent. if you will not be better, don't proceed. in our game, while our rook or queen are not being threatened, our knight and perhaps our overall POSITION are being threatened. and our opponent may be threatening to gain a better position. we aren't necessarily free to develop "normally." whatever we do, it should make us better or him worse or both. and we should prevent him from making himself better or us worse or both. if moving a piece a second time leaves us better overall than if we don't move it (and ESPECIALLY if no other move makes us better than moving that piece a second time), then we should move it. |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() N and after our N is forced to retreat, the W B would be free to remove that c5 pawn, and control the f7 A3 diagonal which prevents us from 0-0. While that condition exists our K cannot castle over a square that is controlled by our opponent. |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() wouldn't save the Knight because of rules and leave white with a pair of Bishops. |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 23-Nov-12, 02:13 |
![]() very good and correct analysis on why this is a bad move. So can we have a decision on saving the N or not. |
|||||||||||||||
kepplersteve 23-Nov-12, 05:38 |
![]() Thanks for these pointers, I've been playing for awhile but not at your level. |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() 7......Nc6 if this is what you meant, then: @Pete, I believe we have four votes for this move. |
|||||||||||||||
kepplersteve 25-Nov-12, 21:28 |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() Nc6 looks good to me |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 28-Nov-12, 01:18 |
![]() Latest moves 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.0-0 Nf6 5.d4 Bxd4 6.Nxd4 Nxd4 7.Be3 Nc6 8.Nc3 |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() At this time, in my opinion, I see not urgency to castle, and also, once the K is castled, on one side or the other it gives the opponent the direction for concentrating an attack on the K, therefore we should keep our option to castle at either side if possible, until our pieces are fully developed and better able to fend off any future aggression. |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() Can we allow that? |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() the e pawn. I do not believe he will trade a B or Q for our N, but I would certainly welcome further input and discussion from our other members on this. |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 29-Nov-12, 01:16 |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() I offered reasons why that should be no immediate threat, and further discussion was that W could move f3 to protect e4. Therefore if we move 8......d6, do you believe his response to that move would still be f3? If not, what would you suggest our next move should be instead of 8........d6? Would you suggest8.........Ne7? ( with 9.......c4 to help d5 control?) Anyone? |
|||||||||||||||
|