| ||||||||||||||||
From | Message | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 12-May-13, 10:29 |
![]() Board Position Latest moves 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.0-0 Nf6 5.d4 Bxd4 6.Nxd4 Nxd4 7.Be3 Nc6 8.Nc3 h6 9.f4 exf4 10.Bxf4 d6 11.Nd5 0-0 12.Bxh6 Ng4 13.Bf4 Nce5 14.Bb3 c6 15.Ne3 Qb6 16.Qd2 Be6 17.h3 Nxe3 18.Qxe3 QxQ 19.BxQ Bxb3 20.axb3 a6 21.Rad1 Rad8 22.Rd2 f6 23.Rfd1 Nf7 24.Bb6 Rd7 25.Bc5 |
|||||||||||||||
zed2 12-May-13, 14:10 |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() 25. ...Rfd8 is what I thought as well. Then, depending on the bishop's mood, we can toggle back and forth between d8 and e8, ...with e attacking the pawn and giving access to e6. things may soon get very interesting. will some action develop on the f, g, & h files? when will the kings get in to the game? |
|||||||||||||||
zed2 12-May-13, 15:01 |
![]() Re8 Bxd6 Nxd6 Rxd6 Rxd6 Rxd6 Rxe4 Which would leave us with a rook each and five pawns....potential for draw. |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 14-May-13, 14:52 |
![]() Just remember to go through your board check each piece can it take can it be taken. |
|||||||||||||||
zed2 14-May-13, 15:03 |
![]() Is this a desired result? |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
zed2 14-May-13, 15:25 |
![]() 2. Bxd6 Nxe4 3. Bxf8 Nxd2 4. Rxd2 Rxd2 which would leave us with advantage if played this way so I think Ng5 is worth considering. |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() Therefore after 25.....Ng5 he cannot play Bd6 so he is forced to protect his d pawn with one of his rooks and we have taken the sting right out of his position. In fact we can then play 26...Rd8 and it looks as if we have turned the tables on white and we have the initiative. If he doubles the rooks on the d file we can do the same and then win the d pawn by the thrust f5! |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
zed2 15-May-13, 17:50 |
![]() Would we consider out Knight to be an advantage over a Bishop which only covers half the board? If we go Rd8 it may not end up an exchange if moves his pieces away as after all he would need to start the exchange by taking our pawn on d6. |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 16-May-13, 03:19 |
![]() Emanuel Lasker - who said - "When you see a good move, look for a better one". I felt the team were getting tunnel vision with the R move. Ignoring the rest of the board. So now you have found a different move you have to decide is it better? |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() zed2, if we did end up with N+pawns vs B+pawns, Pete's comments in his "B vs N" thread makes me think we would not be as good. depending on how Ion responds to ...Ng5 (by making no capture for example), we could end regrouping with rooks on d or e anyway. I do like how ...Ng5 may open things up a little. So, unless someone persuades me to go back to 25. ...Rfd8, I'll vote 25. ...Ng5. as far as zed2's point about N vs B, if anyone wants to hold firm on that and take the position that we CAN NOT risk the B tipping the scales in favor of white AND ALSO THAT ...Ng5 must lead to all four rooks coming off the board, then again I'll consider changing my vote. |
|||||||||||||||
zed2 19-May-13, 16:02 |
![]() Our rook is left on f file directly in line with his Bishop so we would need to move it rather than take his pawn with our Knight which would leave him a pawn up. |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
zed2 19-May-13, 23:38 |
![]() 2. Bxd6 Rfd8 3. Bb4 Rxd2 4. Rxd2 Rxd2 5. Bxd2 We would end up with no rooks but a N and he a B |
|||||||||||||||
zed2 19-May-13, 23:40 |
![]() 2. Rxd6 He could take with his rook which would not be good for us |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() re your post immed above, this is how the sequence you described 4 posts up began. Would still be interested in your thoughts re my response 3 posts up. |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() If 26.Rxd6 Rxd6 Then, If 27..Bxd6, Rd8 is good..pinning the bishop against the rook. or If 27.Rxd6, Nxe4 is good...forking Bishop and Rook. Both continuations are good for black. |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 20-May-13, 09:28 |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() Because if White continues 27.Bxd6 black can play 27...Rxd4 and is at least holding his own after that. As long as he keeps at least one rook surely his knight will be equal to the bishop in the endgame seeing that Black has the compensation of whites double pawn weakness to counterbalance the superiority of the Bishop over the Knight. If, on the other hand, White instead plays 27.Rxd6 black plays 27...Rxd6 and whichever way White recaptures it is winning for Black. i.e. if White plays 28.Rxd6 Black plays Nxe4 forking Whites Bishop and Knight. Or, if White plays 28.Bxd6 Black responds with Rd8 pinning the bishop to the Rook. |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 21-May-13, 03:14 |
![]() can i ask you two to make up your mind so i can play a move |
|||||||||||||||
zed2 21-May-13, 15:46 |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
bigpeta 22-May-13, 00:49 |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|