|
|
From | Comment | ||
---|---|---|---|
pulsepulse69 08-Apr-19, 00:37 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
phonybenoni 08-Apr-19, 01:05 » Report abuse |
![]() What I'd like to se with this set-up is an extension, making it longer. For example, here's a six-move version with a minimal change: This takes it to six moves, but there's a problem: after 1.Ra1 Ke7 2.Kc1 Ke6 3.Kd2 Ke5 4.Ke3 Ke6, both 5.Kd4 and 5.Kf4 are mate next move. I don't see a way to avoid this without ruining th charm of the position. So here's another try, but I don't know if I ike tis as much: ![]() |
||
existentialist 08-Apr-19, 01:33 » Report abuse |
![]() I do find it hard to believe that with all that horsepower that there isn't a duplicate solution hiding somewhere, but maybe not . . . |
||
mkchess 08-Apr-19, 09:44 » Report abuse |
![]() The symmetry of knights and king shows that if the solution is unique then the first move isn't a knight move (e.g. if 1. Ng5 solves then 1. Nc5 also solves). This has an obvious implication. If you note this and you believe that the problem is correct (there is only one solution) the first move is completely obvious (well, this is not a usual way to solve a chess problem, but...) |
||
|
![]() |
||
mkchess 08-Apr-19, 16:15 |
![]() |
||
mkchess 08-Apr-19, 16:19 » Report abuse |
![]() In this cases you can use the option "another solution" to test a variation. |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() 1. Kd2, and kept getting an error message |
||
matidor 08-Apr-19, 23:06 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() I did not realize the solution. |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() It makes sense that the Rook would have to pony up and do his part. |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() Here's a puzzle that I created with a similar "impossible position" theme where there are many possible moves, but the solution may not be obvious: gameknot.com |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
![]() Please log in to post comments.
|