|
| ||||||||||||||||

| From | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
macheide 31-Jan-12, 11:34 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
|
danbarker53711 31-Jan-12, 16:19 » Report abuse |
Almost impossible |
||
|
tugger 31-Jan-12, 21:49 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() If not... You can always save the article to your future grandchildren. If not that either... You will just have to be satisfied to all nice comments here. Nice work mate. |
||
|
kingdawar 06-Feb-23, 02:44 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
|
tugger 06-Feb-23, 02:51 » Report abuse |
![]() And thanks for the link to this Troitzky puzzle. I wasn't aware of its existence but it's a very similar idea to mine. I'm pretty sure I was inspired by Naiderashvilli (see puzzle #8814 for the mating net, it was the climax of a longer study). I hope you're well. |
||
|
capafan 01-Apr-26, 02:11 » Report abuse |
Dbl Sac +2× Zugs MateMaybe giving it a new title would help, like, Double Sacrifice +2× Zugswang? 1. Qa1! ~ threatens mate, oddly enough, since: • if 1...Rb2, 2. Q×R# • if 1...Rc1, 2. Bb2# • if 1...Rd1+, 2. Q×d1 (then either ••), •• if 2...a1=Q, 3. Q×a1# •• (or), if 2...b2, 3. Qb3# • if 1...Re1 / ...Rf1 / ...Rg1 / ...Rh1, 2. Bb2# • if 1...b2, 2. Q×a2# (1...b2 exposes guard of g8B) Zugswang! No other reply avoids mate; therefore Blk must play... 1...R×a1 (•*forced*•) 2. Bb2+...K×b2 (forced) 3. Nc4+...Kb1 (forced) 4. Kd1 --> zugswang...b2 (forced) ~ Blk has been forced to TRAP himself! 5. Nd2# • If not for this DOUBLE zugswang, Blk would never trap himself. • All Blk's moves have been *forced!* •*If "forced" includes preventing shorter mate*• • 4. a4 and 4. g5 would also have forced 4...b2, but they don't leave room for Kt to check. This has been a profoundly *different* puzzle! 🌝 |
Account required
Please log in to post comments.
|