| From | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
lostkarma 21-May-11, 05:30 |
Deleted by lostkarma on 14-Sep-11, 18:10.
|
||
|
hmm interesting topic |
||
|
lostkarma 21-May-11, 07:41 |
Deleted by lostkarma on 14-Sep-11, 18:10.
|
||
|
kingdawar 21-May-11, 07:45 |
|
||
|
lostkarma 21-May-11, 07:53 |
Deleted by lostkarma on 14-Sep-11, 18:12.
|
||
|
heinzkat |
||
|
lostkarma 21-May-11, 08:27 |
Deleted by lostkarma on 14-Sep-11, 18:11.
|
||
|
lostkarma 21-May-11, 09:39 |
Deleted by lostkarma on 14-Sep-11, 18:10.
|
||
|
Responsibility |
||
|
lostkarma 21-May-11, 10:41 |
Deleted by lostkarma on 14-Sep-11, 18:11.
|
||
|
|
||
|
lostkarma 22-May-11, 03:57 |
Deleted by lostkarma on 14-Sep-11, 18:11.
|
||
|
untateve 22-May-11, 05:48 |
|
||
|
lostkarma 22-May-11, 06:16 |
Deleted by lostkarma on 14-Sep-11, 18:11.
|
||
|
Slack buttonIn my advanced years I am beginning to appreciate the beauty of slack (or some call it grace), where if someone cuts me off on the road I oblige him knowing that someday I also will receive slack. When I see an opponent about to time-out I will sometimes postpone my own games hoping that he returns in time to continue. What if a SLACK BUTTON (or a grace button) were added to GK where if one chose he could give his opponent additional time to move? This has been discussed before and if I remember the concern was that if a player didn't give his opponent some slack then his opponent would later accuse him of being an a-hole for not doing so. This is why we cut off people's arms for stealing bread! |
||
|
Yes O Yes for a cutting-him (or her)-some-slack buttonPlaying against certain, strong, inspired competitors, << "you always get a charge of creative energy, trying to be a worthy opponent yourself -- no, not an opponent, but a partner -- in creating a chess masterpiece. You put more, much more fantasy and imagination into such games." >> Have had the experience here where I am playing book and trying out theoretical novelties of world top-20 supergrandmasters, when my gameKnot opponent comes up with a better move than theirs. . . and then a few moves later. . . times out. Losing his brilliancy. Where is the justice in that? Where is the advancement of our chess knowledge? After trying to get GameKnot to reverse the time-out, I then reinstate such a game -- but consider it un-just that my opponent would lose such a brilliant game in the first place. . |
||
|
lostkarma 22-May-11, 15:24 |
Deleted by lostkarma on 14-Sep-11, 18:11.
|
||
|
thereaper1 26-May-11, 23:58 |
I understand that these things happen and not much can be done about it but one thing I have thought is prehaps games shouldn't count if many are lost at once? |
||
|
thereaper1short and your rating wasn't affected. I think you came out of it fairly well! Just continue to play good chess and you will soon be up where you belong. All the best. |
||
|
thereaper1 27-May-11, 19:45 |
Thanks for the comment |
||
|
ganstaman 28-May-11, 18:53 |
Well, there are 2 points I have here: 1) That would be way too open to abuse. If a player was about to lose a game, he could just time out of all his games to avoid losing any rating points. 2) There is now the rating floor to prevent you from falling too far in cases like this. |