| From | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gameknot was down and I timed out |
||
|
|
||
|
Only 1 timeout |
||
|
ReinstatementThat does not change, but I believe your rating goes up if you subsequently win. It goes down more if you subsequently lose. Not sure how this is reflected in your win-loss record. |
||
|
euro_pop_legend 23-Oct-23, 01:47 |
Deleted by euro_pop_legend on 23-Oct-23, 02:08.
|
||
|
@ nathanBut if I seen that I was winning by solid material advantage or a better solid position compared to my opponent,I would definitely go in for the reinstatement if I feel that I could have won that game.Combining your point loss in the first time-out and then a win in the reinstated game will probably gain you some net points,but not much with the + and - total together...depends upon your opponents rating.I assume their is a time limit to do the reinstatement,however,which may have passed by now.But that is "double edged" as well,as in the next paragraph.... I know that it has worked the "reverse"for me in a jubilant way.My opponent timed-out and ask for a reinstatement.I actually had him in a mate in 8 in the first game and would have won anyway.But he did not know that!Then I reinstated the game for him and won again in a few moves for a double point gain in that same game!So,it can work both ways.That was many years ago for me on GK and I am not sure(doubt it) if I can even find those two games again,since it was with another account of mine.I keep old game records on a separate file with another PC,so I will check.If I find it,I will post it one day for others as a "lesson"to do or not to do in some circumstances. |
||
|
Pop-Queen-Legend writes @ Nathan 10-23-23 2:08But if I saw that I was winning by solid material advantage or a better solid position compared to my opponent,I would definitely go in for the reinstatement if I feel that I could have won that game. Combining your point loss in the first time-out and then a win in the reinstated game will probably gain you some net points, but not much, with the + and - total together. Depends upon your opponent’s rating. I assume there is a time limit to do the reinstatement, however, which may have passed by now. But that is "double edged" as well, as in the next paragraph... I know that it has worked the "reverse"for me in a jubilant way. My opponent timed-out and asked for a reinstatement. I actually had him in a mate in 8 in the first game and would have won anyway. But he did not know that! Then I reinstated the game for him and won again in a few moves for a double point gain in that same game! So, it can work both ways. That was many years ago for me on GK and I am not sure (doubt it) if I can even find those two games again, since it was with another account of mine. I keep old game records on a separate file with another PC, so I will check. If I find it, I will post it one day for others as a "lesson" to do or not to do in some circumstances.>> The person you request for reinstatement can always refuse. I tend to only grant requests for positions I see I will easily win again. There is no reason to grant a request for a position you are losing, unless you just really want to be nice, or are rigging your score with a confederate. |
||
|
@ Nathan |
||
|
euro_pop_legend 23-Oct-23, 05:43 |
Deleted by euro_pop_legend on 23-Oct-23, 05:49.
|
||
|
euro_pop_legend 23-Oct-23, 05:49 |
Deleted by euro_pop_legend on 23-Oct-23, 07:12.
|
||
|
euro_pop_legend 23-Oct-23, 06:27 |
Deleted by euro_pop_legend on 23-Oct-23, 07:12.
|
||
|
@ Nathan.Sorry for the deletions,but I am just adding a few things...It was a "hidden message"to my opponent to be more careful next time,analyze the game more carefully and other factors...BEFORE asking for a reinstatment.That lesson simply cost him the price of another 6 points south. Only one time since 2005 did this reinstantment option come to light for me,so it is very rare,I believe on the 2300 or higher rating levels,but I am not sure,of course.But I am not here to mention "all the specifics" about reinstatements,just suggest it. |
||
|
@ nathan |