Team play: Team of 5 years lost Captain and GK says too bad
« Back to forum
FromMessage
ladylinda
19-Mar-13, 23:24

Team of 5 years lost Captain and GK says too bad
Our team captain has played over 3000 games without a single timeout. Last September she went missing with 10 timeouts and hasn't been heard from since. Emails to her come back undeliverable. That was 6 months ago. Our only co-captain left, probably discouraged. I have been trying to reach him to see if he can come back long enough to appoint another co-captain if GK will allow. I am a Life Member for 10 years now and have been on the team for almost 5 years. I was willing to assume the responsibility of captain because we want to keep going (70 of 200 still remaining). We have played over 21,000 team games and are 1 of 20 teams with the most games played. We don't have a high rating, but we have connection and want to stay together. I wrote GK customer support and was told:

Message from GameKnot customer support:
Hello, ladylinda,

As a matter of policy, if the current team captain hasn't logged in to his/her
account in more than 40 days, and also cannot be reached over the e-mail, we can
transfer the team captaincy to one of the co-captains. Unfortunately, your team
doesn't have any co-captains and only the team captain can promote regular team
members to a co-captain.

If you have already tried to contact the missing team captain and were
unsuccessful, the best we can suggest in this situation is starting a brand new
team and inviting players from the old team to join you.

Thank you for choosing GameKnot as your premier chess battlefield!

Best regards,
GameKnot.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When I wrote them again for reconsideration, stating that I had the support of the team members, I was told:

Message from GameKnot customer support:
Hello, ladylinda,

We have a number of internal policies on how to deal with certain unusual
situations (i.e. things that rarely happen normally). We are unable to make
exceptions to our policies, for obvious reasons.

Once again, if your team captain and co-captains are no longer available, the
best we can suggest is starting a new team. Your old team history, etc. will
still be accessible from the old team's profile page, when needed.

Thank you for choosing GameKnot as your premier chess battlefield!

Best regards,
GameKnot.com

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Looking at our old history is not the same as having our history. We are being told to start over because they can't make exceptions to their policies, for obvious reasons. I can't think of any obvious reasons. If our team captain comes back and is okay, I would be more than happy for her to take over again, and would post that on the webpage.

I really just can't understand what the problem is... I can't seem to get past customer service to talk to someone who could make a decision. Several other members have also written and received the same response (word for word).

Any ideas??

LadyLinda
archduke_piccolo
01-Apr-13, 21:57

It has been a while...
... since I looked at the forums, so this may well be behind the fair.

It might be worth asking for an explicit list of at least some of the reasons for being unable to make exceptions to standing policy.

I can understand a reluctance to make exceptions as GK would then have to nut out under what criteria such exceptions were made. Not only that, but making an exception here opens the door to demands that an exception be made there. Then it all becomes chaos.

So the lines have to be drawn somewhere with the commitment that they be not crossed.

Gameknot has been known to review its policy, however. This is not a case of 'making an exception' as recognising a genuine case for flexibility or change on the grounds that the situation is likely to recur. The change that gives an emergency vacation where players are likely to time out was one such.

I believe that one was due to several of my GK friends, and no doubt others, appealing to GK when I was rendered incommunicado by the Christchurch earthquake of February 2011. As a result, the expected long list of timeouts that expected to see a week or so later had been limited to three. Since then I almost timed out on another occasion (lapse of memory), and received an emergency vacation. I don't abuse the privilege, of course (being well capable of arranging vacations for myself) but I am thankful that GK acknowledged the petitioners' case and accept the need for a change. Had they done nothing, though, I would have accepted that as 'them's the breaks.'

I suggest, then, you might look into this as not so much making an exception as making a change. What happens to a team that has no longer a captain nor a co-captain? I can see a potential for abuse, here as it stands. Suppose a team founder decided he no longer wanted to run the team, and went all 'dog in the mangerish' about it. He demotes the co-captains, resigns his captaincy, and disappears over the horizon. The team meanwhile has developed sufficient esprit-de-corps to wish to stay together.

I can see there that those team members might as well just create a new team, but that, as you have mentioned, disconnects it from its history. This is a consideration, I agree, if the team has been around quite a while. It seems to me in this unusual situation, team members ought to have some kind of discretionary power - in an interregnum of no captain nor co-captain - to appoint or accept a volunteer captain.

I suggest you present a case something along those lines, pushing it as a (small) change in policy rather than special pleading for an exception. GK might buy it; they might not. But it would be kinda nice if they were to say why they feel unable to accept that change.
classica
27-Oct-14, 11:43

LadyLinda saved the team by keeping after
GameKnot - for months. All of the team members
had to put in their profile "I vote for LadyLinda to
be captain of our team" or something similar. Finally,
months later - we had LadyLinda as the new captain.

Morale of the story: Have at least one co-captain,
to become captain, should the captain disappear -
or risk the team's future. I'm not sure if Gameknot
was dragging their heels because they didn't know
what to do, or because they were dragging their heels.

We didn't lose our 20,000 games played, and we
made it to the top of the ladder a few times.
This story has a happy ending!  

Peace and blessings,
Classica
archduke_piccolo
27-Oct-14, 12:48

Well...
... there you go.

A case was made, and if GK was difficult to persuade, that's probably as it it should be. That GK was persuadable at all is equally probably as it should be.
maramaldo
16-Aug-23, 21:45

Unfair timeout punishment
maramaldo
Queretaro August 16th 2023
Last night, at approximately 2230, the GameKnot system went out of work for me.
It was only GameKnot, all other sites (Google, Skype, Firefox, gmail) were working perfectly.
GameKnot became alive again this morning at 1030.
Did you have a problem? It can happen!
In any case, your problem resulted, for me, in a game loss for timeout, in the game I was playing against kbaydude.
I do not think it is fair! I protest and ask for a correction.
Thank you for your attention.
Cheers
Fausto Calabria
classica
17-Aug-23, 02:31

gameknot.com Contact GK
monk2
07-Feb-24, 23:02

Team of five years lost Capt and co- cap
Gameknot has policies for a reason
They have no control over who comes

and goes or why. I agree they COULD
amend their policies to accommodate you;
BUT if they won't don't become bitter. Life has
many circumstances that cause us to "MOVE
ON" . This sounds like one of them.